Second, the restructuring of state-owned enterprises, the management of state-owned assets and the management of companies are all problems that cannot be clearly explained in an explanation letter.
Interested people can look at the prospectus of listed companies. It's just that a company has to explain so many things to the public if it wants to issue shares. If you answer a question asked by Sima, it is not as simple as saying "yes" or "no" or "what you said is wrong".
According to my experience, to invest in a project, the management of an enterprise needs to submit relevant materials to the board of directors, hold a meeting to introduce the situation to the directors and answer questions. When holding the annual general meeting of shareholders, it is also necessary to report the company's financial status and operation. All this can only be said by people who have a certain understanding of this enterprise, but it is impossible for people who have no understanding of this enterprise at all.
So many people on the Internet questioned why Lenovo didn't reply, but they didn't understand that the management of enterprises was very complicated, and it was really something that could not be debated on the public platform.
The people who eat melons should wait for the conclusion of the authoritative department.
First of all, Sima Yi's reason is questioning, that is, picking out the guilty and the guilty. Then he changed the questioning into questioning, which is also because he was afraid of getting into a lawsuit in order to protect himself.
In addition, Sima Yi does not represent the country's questioning. Although Sima Yi has the right to ask questions on behalf of his team, Lenovo Group has no obligation to answer any questions he raises. This has nothing to do with arrogance, so it has nothing to do with Sima Yi's questioning, but his qualification. Why? He can't represent the country or the law, so he can't make any legally invalid ruling on what he questions.
Even if Lenovo answers Sima Yi's question positively, Sima Yi will muddy the water and divert the topic of attack, while the people who eat melons who don't know the truth will be pulled away from the essence of the incident and let the incident continue to be heated up. This is the genius of Sima Yi's team.
Therefore, Lenovo Group is unwilling to argue with a cultural businessman. It is only when the investigation results of the joint investigation team are announced that Lenovo legal persons and management teams violate the law or regulations, what punishment should they receive? This should be investigated and audited by the state to draw a fair conclusion. Trust the laws of the country. If Lenovo Group, legal person and management team commit crimes, they will never escape the legal sanctions.
Sima Yi questioned Lenovo's occupation of the land of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Then I asked him, who owns the state-owned land of state-owned enterprises now? Have you investigated it? I think most of them were sold at a low price by the original enterprise legal person or contractor, or bought at a low price by themselves. Why not condemn it together, only Lenovo? what is the purpose?
What's the use if a person or an enterprise is unpatriotic?
90% of the liabilities and cash are divided up by foreigners of these executives, and the remaining chicken feathers are left to the bank. These people certainly want Lenovo to go bankrupt, so once it is over, no one will pursue the loss of state-owned assets. Now executives are foreigners, and Lenovo is their ATM. Once it goes bankrupt, it just completes the mission of withdrawing money.
Lenovo's actions are obvious to all. Official anti-corruption can be traced back to 20 years ago. As an association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, it can also be traced back to the end, or it must be returned!
Lenovo is a tool to dig money. The money has been dug away, and it is too late to abandon it! What about hundreds of billions of debts? It's impossible to return it. The bank is in trouble. I wonder which bank it should be. There should be a real estate problem, yes, it should be baking. The whole process, from state-owned to private, finally degenerated into debt, and the money was in the hands of executives. Why can't I see the supervision function?
Lenovo's arrogance reflects Lenovo's extremely low status, especially the problem of sending a female secretary is too smelly. After that, it should be a public response from the whole network. So far, it has completely destroyed Lenovo, not a problem that is being destroyed. The whole network believes that Lenovo has completely transformed into a capitalist association. Liu Yang should completely break away from Lenovo and keep Lenovo in the hands of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, in exchange for the Chinese people not to pursue Liu Yang's original sin, so that Liu Yangcai will not be destroyed, Lenovo is still a national enterprise, and Lenovo has hope.
Lenovo is an association of China people, and some people's corrupt behaviors should be investigated, so as to get on the right track and make their due contribution to the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
Is to destroy Lenovo. He is a profiteer and an opportunist through and through.
Asking this question is a problem in itself. Mr Si Manan only questioned whether there were problems in Lenovo's restructuring process, business direction, salary system and top management. It should be far from who will protect Lenovo and who will destroy Lenovo. On the other hand, what if there is no association? Only a computer assembly factory and several small loan companies are missing.