Evaluation standard of efficient classroom 1. Evaluation from the teaching concept: whether it embodies the basic concept of curriculum reform, whether it highlights the spirit of quality education, whether it embodies ideological and moral cultivation, and whether quality education is integrated into foreign language teaching. Facing all students, we should pay attention to the cultivation and improvement of students' comprehensive ability of listening, speaking, reading, writing and translation, pay attention to the development of each student to varying degrees, adhere to the combination of implementing basic knowledge and skills with cultivating students' innovative spirit and practical ability, and bring emotion, motivation and competition into the classroom.
2. Evaluate from two dimensions: students and teachers:
First, the emotional process of students in classroom teaching.
1. Teaching atmosphere: whether an equal, democratic and harmonious teacher-student relationship is created, whether teachers encourage students to find and ask questions, and whether students are bold and willing to cooperate.
2. Interest in learning: Does the teacher fully mobilize students' learning enthusiasm, so that all students can actively and effectively participate in classroom activities, and do students have a strong thirst for knowledge?
3. Self-confidence in learning: Can students experience success in English learning, and know themselves and build self-confidence in English learning?
4. Emotional attitude: whether students can get emotional experience in English learning and whether the emotional field between teachers and students is compatible.
Second, the teaching process of teachers in the classroom.
1. Teaching objectives and content setting: Can we accurately grasp the three-dimensional objectives, highlight key points, break through difficulties with appropriate methods and strategies, and teach correctly and scientifically? Enhance modern consciousness, adapt to the needs of the times, pay attention to the reality of students' lives, and rationally and creatively integrate teaching materials, which is in line with students' cognitive laws; The difficulty of teaching and practice is appropriate.
2. Teaching methods: Whether we can use modern educational technology scientifically and reasonably or inherit simple and practical traditional teaching methods according to the needs of teaching activities. (such as objects, wall charts, tape recorders or multimedia for teaching)
3. Teaching methods: Can it be conducive to the realization of classroom teaching objectives and provide students with the situation of listening, speaking, reading and writing language practice and the space for independent inquiry, independent thinking and cooperative communication? Whether it can keep students' attention and interest; Whether it can promote students' understanding and memory, help students' logical thinking ability, stimulate students' innovative thinking and develop students' observation and imagination. Specific aspects:
(1) Can you elaborate on classroom questioning?
When asking questions in class, whether to pay attention to cultivating students' thinking ability, the questions asked should be beneficial to three aspects:
(1) is conducive to promoting the development of students' cognitive ability rather than simple knowledge (for example, where did you miss anything).
(2) It is conducive to the establishment of students' thinking model (for example, how do you know? Why? )
(3) It is conducive to cultivating students' divergent thinking (for example, are there any other reasons? Can you tell us the difference between them? )
(2) Can we pay attention to the cultivation of innovative ability?
For example, in English textbooks, some texts appear in the form of dialogues, so students are required to rewrite them in the form of short essays, and some texts appear in the form of short essays, so it is required to adapt them into dialogues to train students' creative thinking.
(3) Whether the basic classroom requirements of EPU teaching mode can be reflected, that is, the principles of learning before teaching, trying before guiding, practicing before speaking, recording more and analyzing less, and fully reflecting students' autonomous learning, cooperative learning and self-management. Strive to make sure that no students study hard and explain; No students think completely independently, do not communicate or explore; I didn't find the confusion and obstacles of students' thinking, nor did I explain and solve the doubts. In this link, we should pay attention to rational laws, rational ideas and rational methods. Combining the characteristics of Chinese subject with real life, we can transfer and apply the knowledge we have learned.
4. Classroom control: whether effective teaching activities (such as discussion, competition, performance, etc.) can be organized. ) effectively guide the process of classroom activities according to the teaching design, so as to be open and closed; We can discover and use the curriculum resources generated in the classroom, innovate teaching activities, promote students' development and learn from each other between teachers and students.
5. Process evaluation: Whether diversified and personalized evaluation methods can be adopted to stimulate students' interest and self-confidence in learning and guide students to innovate and practice. Pay attention to students' learning process through evaluation, and pay attention to the harmonious development of students' thinking, emotion and attitude in the learning process.
6. Teachers' quality: Teachers are knowledgeable and solid, and can help students understand the differences between the world and Chinese and Western cultures. They are fluent in spoken English, pure and beautiful in pronunciation, strong in language expression, concise in language norms, correct in writing, cordial and dignified in teaching style, infectious, properly used in media, and have their own teaching style and personality.
Efficient classroom evaluation scheme 1 I. evaluation principles:
1, bundled evaluation
The evaluation of classroom reform in our school should focus on development, ability, quality and level, and mainly adopt the method of parallel evaluation. Evaluate with 6? In a group of eight people, progress can only be said if all members of the group have made progress, and one person's progress is not progress, so as to promote students to study hard together and achieve the effect of progress. The evaluation of learning process is combined with the evaluation of learning results, focusing on the evaluation of learning process, reflecting? Dont Ask For Help people are very successful, but they want everyone to make progress? The concept of. Face up to students' objective differences, attach importance to students' individual optimization and development, combine collective evaluation with individual evaluation of team members, and focus on team collective evaluation. There should be public evaluation, daily evaluation, weekly evaluation, monthly evaluation and school commendation for one semester. At the same time, we regularly carry out selection activities such as the best study group, the best team leader, the fastest progress award, the speech pacesetter, and the performance expert. The focus of the whole evaluation should shift from encouraging individual competition to cooperation, so that each student can build up learning confidence and encourage them to constantly improve the level of group cooperation activities, so as to achieve individual goals and promote the realization of group goals.
2. Evaluation indicators:
(1) Participation rate: Every member must actively participate.
(2) Wonderful degree: The audience automatically applauds the exhibitors.
(3) Gold content: the accuracy, innovation and ideological content displayed by exhibitors.
Second, the grading work
1, student representative score:
There are scorekeepers in the class, and the players take turns to serve. The scorekeeper should fill in the score in the corresponding position of the evaluation form on the blackboard in time after the teacher gives the score. After class, student representatives should quickly transfer the scores on the teaching process evaluation form on the blackboard to the teaching process evaluation form issued to them by the school every semester. The grading records of student representatives will be used as the evaluation criteria for excellent study groups.
2, study group leader score
The person in charge of each study group counts the learning process scores of the members of this group. The score of each student's learning process is used as the basis for excellent study groups.
3. Statistical scores of class committees
The Learning Committee summarizes the scores of each group and each subject every day and calculates the total score of each group's daily learning process. On Monday, we will calculate the total scores of each group's learning process in one week and judge the excellent groups.
The class committee will select students according to the scores provided by each group. Show star? 、? Star of doubt? . The selection of each honor must be based on the results of the total score of the class evaluation on duty. For example, a group won the first place in the learning process this week, but because the team members deducted more points in the class evaluation duty inspection, the group would miss out on the excellent group. The team leader tried to straighten himself out because the team members were not disciplined.
Third, the evaluation mechanism:
1, preparation before class
Students who are late or absent without reason in the group will be deducted 1 point, and students who are not late or absent will not be evaluated. No matter whether the group members listen quietly or not, if they don't listen quietly, they will be deducted 1 point. Whether the group exhibition board is clean or not, and whether the blackboard writing is neat or not, the unqualified ones will be deducted 1 point. There are scraps of paper and dust on the ground; The tables and chairs are not placed neatly, the tables and chairs are clean and scribbled, and the books on the table are not placed neatly. If you fail, you will be deducted 1 point.
2. Check before class
Pre-class inspection means that the teacher checks the knowledge or expectation of the students in the last class before class. Team members get 1 point for good performance and 2 points for excellent performance. 3 points will be added for those who are particularly excellent, and those who meet the basic standards will not be scored.
Step 3 complete the study plan
Students' project assignments can be divided into three grades: A, B and C, and given different scores: Grade A: the guidance plan is written neatly, the answers are standardized, and there are detailed summaries and reflections. The correct rate and the completion rate are above 90%, giving 4-5 points. Grade B: The counseling plan is neatly written, with standardized answers, summary and reflection. Correct rate and completion rate are 80%-90%, giving 3-4 points. Grade C: The counseling plan is poorly written, the answers are not standardized, the summary and reflection are incomplete, and the accuracy and completion rate are below 80%, giving 0-3 points.
The highest score of this level is 5 points, which will be assessed when the teacher or group leader checks the counseling plan, and the group leader will register the scores.
Step 4 study together
Group cooperative learning requires the group leader to organize seriously and responsibly, and the group members actively discuss. No gossip, interference or shirking responsibility. Team members with good cooperative learning situation will be given 1 point, excellent team members will be given 2 points, especially excellent team members will be given 3 points, and those who have basically reached the standard will not be scored. In class cooperative learning, if you don't participate in class discussion cooperative learning or group learning within one day, deduct 1 point; If you don't help each other learn within one day, you will be deducted 1 point.
5. Demonstration process
When displaying, the scribe writes neatly; The commentator's voice is loud and clear, and there is excessive before and after; Correctors correct in time, supplement in place, and be creative. Full preparation, explanation in place, analysis and thinking, without looking at the answer, add 1 to 5 points. In order to encourage class C students to talk more and participate more in class, they should be given extra points in their speeches.
Step 6 Ask and answer questions
Question: In the process of group presentation, students' questions should be deep and enlightening. When asking questions, add 1 point for those who are basically in the right direction, add 2 points for those who have a certain depth, add 3 points for those who are enlightening, and do not score for those who are incorrect.
Q&A: In the process of inter-group presentation, the teacher asks questions, and when the students in the group answer questions, they actively participate, behave appropriately and answer correctly. The team will get 1 point, 2 points for excellent, 3 points for excellent, and no score for incorrect.
7. Classroom testing
On the day of inspection, students are required to complete the standard inspection. Students should correct each other in time and have a team leader check the validity of their signatures. Otherwise, you won't get extra points, and 2 points will be added for those who have completed it.
8. Classroom discipline: For gossiping, slapstick, plagiarism and inattention in class, each person will be deducted 1 point, and each person will be deducted 1 point for shirking or being absent from various activities organized by classes and groups.
9. Homework: Deduct 1 point for unfinished tasks such as preview; Deduction for missing homework 1 point; 1 point for plagiarism in each assignment and exam; If the homework is sloppy or untidy, 1 point will be deducted.
Evaluation scheme of students' individual and study group in efficient classroom
Class 7 of Tantou Middle School (1)
I. Personal learning
1, classroom habits
A: Prepare learning tools before class, with a score of +0.5, otherwise, with a score of -0.5.
B: Correct sitting posture and good writing posture in class, +0.5 points, otherwise -0.5 points. C: whispering in class, making small gestures, affecting other students' study,-1~5 points. D: Answer questions positively, express correctly, be clear and fluent, and have a natural attitude. The score is+1~2.
2. Homework
Answer: Unreasonable late delivery or non-delivery-1.
B: Copy others' homework -2 points, copy others' homework -2 points.
C: If the homework is serious and the correct rate is high, the teacher can reward 1-5 points every week as appropriate.
D: If the work progress is great, you can add 1 as appropriate. 3 points
3. detection.
A. excellent grades, +5 points.
B. excellent grades, +4 points.
C. the score is qualified, +3 points.
D. the score has improved, +2 points.
E. the score failed,-1.
F. For the monthly exam, the mid-term exam ranked first in the whole school 1- 10, plus +5 points; 1 1-20, +4 points; 2 1-30, +3 points; 3 1-40, +2 points; 4 1-50, + 1; 5 1-60 +0.5
4. Discipline and health
A. littering everywhere, -0.5 points.
B. No cleaning,-1.
C. Self-study and sleeping in the afternoon are against discipline,-1~5 points.
D. disrespect classmates and teachers, abuse, quarrel, fight, etc. -1~5 points. E. Not doing the problem in time,-1~5 points.
Second, group study.
1. Investigation
A. the average score of the group is ranked, and the scores are scored from high to low. The evaluation method is: first place: 5 points; Second and third place: 4 points; Fourth and fifth place: 3 points; Sixth and seventh place, 2 points.
Step 2 study together
A. Being active in the process of group cooperation, with strong organizational discipline and high efficiency,+1~2 points.
B. The group presentation is natural and generous, and the explanation is clear and wonderful. The score is+1~5.
C the team is harmonious, united and friendly, doing well, being quiet and sincere, with a score of+1~5.
Three. The form of group discussion is as follows:
A. Free speech: Students can speak freely in groups, and students can express their opinions in a word.
B. Take turns to speak: the group members speak one by one around a central topic, leaving no one missing.
C. Class 1 discussion: When some students can't solve their questions despite their best efforts, the team members give guidance and tips to help them solve the problems.
Four. Eight principles of group cooperative learning:
Sit in a correct and orderly manner;
Efficient self-study and active speech;
Cooperate to explore, question and ask difficult questions;
Unity, mutual assistance and common development.
Five, team cooperation to learn eight skills:
Learn to listen, learn to take notes,
Learn to learn from each other, learn to show,
Learn to think, learn to question,
Learn to cooperate and explore.
Group evaluation results of intransitive verbs
1. Team leader: discipline and health
Deputy Team Leaders: Deng Fen and Tong Fen
2. Summarize once a week and judge an excellent team, an excellent team leader and an excellent individual.
Summarize once a month and judge outstanding groups, outstanding individuals and outstanding group leaders. At the end of the year, outstanding teams, outstanding team leaders and outstanding individuals will be judged. Every time the evaluation results come out, the winners will be rewarded.
Management plan for the next semester of Senior Two.
First, the person in charge of each department:
Grade leader: Director Zhang
1. General Manager: Geng
Person in charge of the restaurant: Cai Nan bedroom: Ren, Wei Nv bedroom:.
Accounting: Chang Health Supervisor: Cultural Construction Supervisor: Wu Chenggong Grade Group Material Supervisor: Guo Shuli,.
2. Instructor: Xu Lei.
Subject leaders are as follows: Language: Wu Chenggong Mathematics: Xu Lei English: Xu Chunlian Physics: Su Yong.
Chemistry: Wei Biology: Chang Xianke Politics: School Geography: History: Geng
Second, evaluate the performance:
1, the heads of all departments give the class a bound evaluation.
Management and teaching leaders will give extra points to the performance of each class every day. After sorting out the class results at the end of the month, it is divided into three grades: A, B and C, and the performance salary of the head teacher and classroom teacher is distributed according to the class level.
The specific distribution is as follows:
(1) Performance of the head teacher: The head teacher put himself into 500 yuan, but Class B didn't move, and Class C took it out.
10%- 100% (determined by the difference) to the class teacher of class a.
(2) Teachers' class performance: Teachers devote themselves to 9 yuan per class, while Class B is still and Class C is still.
Classes give 10%-20% (depending on the difference) to the teachers in Class A and the class teacher.
Assign according to the teacher's performance.
2, the class teacher's assessment of teachers.
Per capita 300 yuan's performance salary is allocated to the class teacher according to the number of classes he attends.
According to the teacher's usual performance, such as whether to help manage the class and whether the teaching performance is outstanding.
The classroom teacher evaluates.
3, grade group assessment of each department head:
(1) Each teacher spends 1 yuan per class, and the grade group tests the performance of department heads.
Nuclear reward.
(2) Conduct special treatment for classes that violate school discipline. Reflected in the performance appraisal project of 300 yuan per capita.
Note: Sound, body and machine participate in the evaluation.
Efficient classroom evaluation method 2: clear teaching ideas, rigorous classroom structure and reasonable teaching density can promote students' quality to be better improved and students benefit a lot. Students make progress on the original basis, and members do not exchange grades during the whole process.
First, the teaching objectives (overall goal consciousness)
? The teaching goal is comprehensive, specific and clear, which conforms to the curriculum standards, teaching materials and students' reality.
? Put forward and handle the key points and difficulties properly, grasp the key points and impart accurate knowledge? A strong sense of achieving teaching objectives runs through the teaching process.
Second, the teaching process (reflecting the subjective consciousness)
? Clear teaching ideas, rigorous classroom structure and reasonable teaching density.
? Facing all, reflecting differences, teaching students in accordance with their aptitude and improving students' quality in an all-round way.
? The amount of knowledge transfer and ability training is moderate, focusing on key points and grasping key points.
? Create opportunities for students to actively participate and develop.
? The conclusion reflects the process of knowledge formation, which is the process of students from enlightenment to discovery.
Third, teaching methods (reflecting ability consciousness)
? Pay attention to the cultivation of thinking and implement basic knowledge and skills.
? The teaching methods are flexible and diverse, which are in line with the curriculum standards and students' reality.
? Multi-party exchange of teaching information, timely feedback and effective correction.
? Proceed from reality and use modern teaching methods.
Fourth, emotional education (reflecting emotional awareness)
? Teaching democracy, equality between teachers and students, harmonious classroom atmosphere and cultivation of innovative ability.
? Pay attention to the cultivation of non-intellectual factors such as students' motivation, interest, habits and confidence.
Five, teaching basic skills (skill awareness)
? The language specification is concise and vivid.
? The teaching attitude is cordial and natural, dignified and generous.
? The blackboard writing is neat and beautiful, concise and clear, with distinct layers.
? Can skillfully use modern teaching methods.
? Strong classroom control ability.
Sixth, teaching effect (reflecting efficiency consciousness)
? The teaching goal has been achieved and the teaching effect is good.
? Students will learn and take the initiative, and the classroom atmosphere will be active.
? Moderate information, reasonable burden on students, and short-term efficiency.
Seven, teaching personality (reflecting the sense of characteristics)
? Teaching has its own characteristics.
? Teachers form teaching styles.
The function of classroom evaluation
? Promote the improvement of school teaching quality
? Promote the improvement of teachers' professional quality
? Promote the improvement of the level of teaching and scientific research in schools.
? Promote the quality of students to be better improved.
Optimize teachers' educational ideas and concepts, optimize teaching objectives, optimize teaching contents and optimize teaching methods and means.
Teaching process, optimizing teachers' basic teaching skills
Principles of classroom evaluation
? The principle of telling the truth
? Psychological zero distance? principle
? Principle of highlighting key points
? Incentive principle
? Principle of individual difference.
? Artistic principle
? Starting with the overall and comprehensive evaluation
Analysis of the teaching objectives of 1 Teaching goal is the starting point and destination of teaching, and its formulation and realization is the main measure of course quality.
? From the formulation of goals: comprehensive, specific and appropriate.
? Judging from the achievement of the goal, it is clearly reflected in the teaching link, and the means are closely guaranteed, consolidated and strengthened around the key contents of the teaching goal.
Treating teaching material analysis with Chemistry 2
? The teaching content is scientific and accurate
? The selection of teaching materials highlights the key points
3 teaching plan analysis
Teaching thinking design
The design of teaching content, the reality, uniqueness and transcendence of students, the hierarchy, situation and operation effect of teaching thought.
? The classroom structure is rigorous, interlocking, natural, reasonable time allocation, moderate density and high efficiency.
4. Teaching methods and means are analyzed according to the actual situation and optimized and applied flexibly.
? Diversification of teaching methods
? Reform and innovation of teaching methods
? Application of modern teaching methods
5 Analysis of teachers' basic teaching skills
State language operation of blackboard writing teaching
6 teaching effect analysis
? High efficiency, students' active thinking and warm atmosphere.
? Students benefit greatly, and different students make progress on the original basis.
? Effective use of time and reasonable burden on students.
? Large and efficient classroom? appraisal procedure
First, the inspection method:
Spot check twice a week, one class at a time. Through the horizontal comparison of the ongoing classrooms on the same floor, the effective number of classes is mainly checked and recorded, supplemented by the classroom atmosphere, and evaluated and scored. The scoring method is based on three categories of ABC.
Second, the evaluation division of labor:
Person in charge: Chuanxi Wang.
Group 1: Xu Honglian (team leader), Gao Zhen, Lan Yin inspected the first floor, Group 2: (team leader), Bu inspected the second floor, Group 3: Wang (team leader), Bi Lijun inspected the third floor.
Third, the operation process:
(1) Confirm the inspection times, and notify the inspectors half a day in advance (if the inspectors can't change shifts by themselves, arrange the inspection time to ensure that they participate in two sampling inspections).
(2) The team leader shall organize members to carry out inspections at the same time, and the number of inspections shall be no less than 2 times, with 5? 10 minutes.
(3) fill in? Large and efficient classroom? Teaching evaluation form, recommending the comprehensive list of the top 2 teachers on this floor. Fill in the signature and check the time and road section.
(4) Submit this week's inspection results to Chuanxi Wang, the quality center, before school ends on Friday morning.
Check the results of non-communication between members in the whole process.
Fourth, the commendation method:
The quality center summarizes every two weeks and commends 20 people each time. Summarize the results of the two-week inspection, rank the number of recommendations from more to less, and determine the top 20 as commended personnel; Since the number of tied places exceeds 20, the final list will be produced by the real-name voting of the leading group; When the recommended number is less than 20, it will be commended according to the actual number.
The final interpretation right belongs to the quality center.
Bei cheng shou Tian primary school
20 16-2- 17
Efficient classroom evaluation method 2016 2016-07-29 20: 01:05 | # 3 building catalogue
? Large and efficient classroom? appraisal procedure
First, the inspection method:
Spot check twice a week, one class at a time. Through the horizontal comparison of the ongoing classrooms on the same floor, the effective number of classes is mainly checked and recorded, supplemented by the classroom atmosphere, and evaluated and scored. The scoring method is based on three categories of ABC.
Second, the evaluation division of labor:
Person in charge:
Group 1: (Team leader) Check the first floor.
Group 2: (Team leader) Check the second floor.
Group 3: (Team Leader) Check the third floor.
Third, the operation process:
(1) Confirm the inspection times, and notify the inspectors half a day in advance (if the inspectors can't change shifts by themselves, arrange the inspection time to ensure that they participate in two sampling inspections).
(2) The team leader shall organize members to carry out inspections at the same time, and the number of inspections shall be no less than 2 times, with 5? 10 minutes.
(3) fill in? Large and efficient classroom? Teaching evaluation form, recommending the comprehensive list of the top 2 teachers on this floor. Fill in the signature and check the time and road section.
(4) Submit this week's inspection results to Chuanxi Wang, the quality center, before school ends on Friday morning.
Check the results of non-communication between members in the whole process.
Fourth, the commendation method:
The quality center summarizes every two weeks and commends 20 people each time. Summarize the results of the two-week inspection, rank the number of recommendations from more to less, and determine the top 20 as commended personnel; Since the number of tied places exceeds 20, the final list will be produced by the real-name voting of the leading group; When the recommended number is less than 20, it will be commended according to the actual number.
The final interpretation right belongs to the quality center.