This kind of equity holding agreement is still relatively common. Its main contents are: 1, giving employees (management) a certain amount of equity income, but not giving them decision-making power; 2. The donee can enjoy the equity income and the dividends corresponding to the equity; 3. Grant the right of transfer after the lock-up period. This equity holding agreement is valid. Even if there is a small flaw such as a wrong name, there is a signature at the back, the names of Party A and Party B in front and the ID number in the middle, this small flaw will not affect the validity of the contract. This equity agreement gives the holder the decision-making power in the equity, but it does not give ownership and cannot be transferred (during the lock-up period). Now, the company says that it will deal with this equity holding agreement together, that is to say, it will give you the income right in the equity together with the compensation for the termination of the labor contract. But the company's idea is that the labor arbitration commission will not adopt it, and it is also one aspect to solve it together. Your shareholding agreement stipulates jurisdiction, which stipulates that if there is a dispute, the jurisdiction court is the people's court where the company is located. Even if you agree, the company agrees, and the arbitration commission can't make a ruling. (If it is cut, you can apply to the court for invalidation of the arbitral award. ) Tencent creates space, a platform for entrepreneurship. So now it seems that there are only two ways: 1, labor arbitration solves the problem of illegal termination of labor contract, pays double economic compensation, and then handles the equity holding agreement separately; 2. Labor arbitration shall be settled out of court. The company gives you the solution of equity holding agreement, and you accept it. Together with economic compensation, an out-of-court settlement was reached, and the owner withdrew the lawsuit from the arbitration commission.