Current location - Quotes Website - Signature design - Does the representative sign the contract have greater responsibility?
Does the representative sign the contract have greater responsibility?

Is the responsibility of the representative signing on the contract large? It requires specific analysis of the specific situation. The following is the analysis: Not large. The signatory of the company contract does not have to bear the contractual responsibility. The signing behavior represents the company, and the company bears the contractual liability. However, if the signatory is not a staff member of the company and has not authorized the entrustment, the company will not be held responsible and the contractual liability will be borne by the signatory.

Authorized representatives who sign the agreement are not legally responsible. If a person signs a contract as an authorized representative of the company, the rights and obligations of the contract shall be borne by the company, and the signatory shall not be held liable under the contract. The signature of the authorized representative only proves the confirmation of the signed contract, represents the interests of the company, is an act of performing duties, and does not assume legal liability related to the contract.

1. Is the labor contract effective without an official seal?

1. If the person signing the labor contract is the legal representative of the employer, his behavior will be directly regarded as the employer. Therefore, the legal representative’s signature on the labor contract proves that the employer recognizes and agrees to the labor contract. Even if the employer does not stamp it, the labor contract is still valid. 2. If the person who signs the labor contract is not the legal representative of the employer, but other staff members, since these people cannot legally directly represent the employer to perform certain actions externally, they can only do so after obtaining authorization in advance. Under certain circumstances, his signature can bind the company and make the contract effective.

2. Can a special financial seal be stamped on the contract?

Contracts are generally stamped with official seals, not financial seals. When signing a contract with an external party, it is usually stamped with the company's official seal or a contract-specific seal. The official seal or contract-specific seal can represent the company's will and has the same legal effect as a signature. The financial seal is mainly used for financial settlement, issuing receipts, invoices, etc., and represents the company's financial rights and obligations.

Legal basis:

"Contract Law of the People's Republic of China"

Article 171 A person who has no authority to act has no authority to act. , exceed the authority of agency or continue to perform agency acts after the authority of agency is terminated, without ratification by the principal, it will not be effective against the principal.

The counterparty may urge the principal to ratify it within thirty days from the date of receipt of the notice. If the principal fails to make any representation, it shall be deemed as a refusal to ratify. Before the act performed by the actor is ratified, the counterparty in good faith has the right to revoke it. Cancellation shall be made by notification.

If the act committed by the actor has not been ratified, the counterparty in good faith has the right to request the actor to perform the debt or to request compensation from the actor for the damage suffered. However, the scope of compensation shall not exceed the benefits that the counterparty can obtain when ratified by the agent.

If the counterparty knows or should know that the actor has no authority to act, the counterparty and the actor shall bear liability according to their respective faults.