Is it valid to print a written contract with handwritten terms? First of all, the contract is held by both parties, so it cannot be your unilateral supplementary clause; Secondly, when a contract dispute is involved, it will be judged according to the transaction facts of both parties, and the contract is only a reference.

In addition, when changing the contract, it is not recommended to write or seal the supplementary terms of the contract. The best solution is to sign a supplementary agreement. Because the process of signing and stamping is the same.

Hmm. How interesting

Are the terms added by the boss in the contract valid? Regarding your question, the provisions of general principles of civil law, contract law and other legal documents shall apply.

The contents of the contract shall be determined by both parties on the principle of equality, voluntariness and consensus, and neither party has the right to modify the contents of the contract.

If the boss adds a new clause before signing the contract, and both parties sign it after the other party agrees, the new clause is valid.

If the boss adds a new clause after signing the contract, the new clause is invalid.

If a clause is manually added to the signed contract, is the contract still valid? If the terms are negotiated by both parties, they are valid. However, both parties should have the same clauses in the contract, because in practice, when one party holds a handwritten clause in the contract and the other party does not have the corresponding clause, the court holds that the clause is invalid.

Is the handwritten rent clause on the back of the old contract still valid? The lease term of the old house lease contract is one year, 20 1 1-20 12, and the rent for the next three years (2012-2013-2065438+) is written on the back of the contract. The signature of the tenant on the front of the contract has been changed to the name of the current tenant for many times due to the transfer. 20 12 signed a new contract, the terms of which are basically the same as those of the old contract, excluding the lessee's priority to lease. However, there is no agreement on the rent after the expiration of the new contract, which only means that the two sides will discuss the rent again in 2008. If the two parties fail to negotiate after the expiration of the new contract, can the landlord not rent or raise the price? Is the three-year rent stipulated in the old contract still valid after the signing of the new contract? Do you need the landlord to pay the tenant's transfer fee and decoration fee?

The contract is invalid, is the breach clause valid? The contract is invalid, unless it is stipulated in the contract that the contract is invalid and the liability clause for breach of contract is still valid, otherwise the breach clause is invalid.

According to Article 58 of the Contract Law, after the contract is invalid or cancelled, the property obtained from the contract shall be returned; If it is impossible or unnecessary to return it, it shall be compensated at a discount. The party at fault shall compensate the other party for the losses suffered as a result. If both parties are at fault, they shall bear their respective responsibilities.

If the contract is invalid, whether the breach clause is valid or not, or even the contract itself is invalid, then all the contents of the contract (including the breach clause agreed in the contract) are also invalid clauses.

If there is a contradiction between the printed and handwritten contract, is the contract valid? According to common sense, the handwritten part appears in the printed contract text and should be done after printing. If the handwritten content of all parties in the contract text is the same, and the handwritten content is inconsistent with the printed part, it shall be regarded as the modification of the printed part by the handwritten part, and the handwritten part shall prevail. Of course, no matter which part it is, the part recognized by all parties shall prevail first. Whether the contract is valid or not is another concept. Contracts that do not violate the validity provisions of laws and administrative regulations are valid.

Is the overlord clause in the manual labor contract valid? According to Article 18 of the Labor Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the following labor contracts are invalid:

(1) Labor contracts that violate laws and administrative regulations;

(2) Labor contracts concluded by fraud or threat.

An invalid labor contract is not legally binding from the time it is concluded. If part of the labor contract is confirmed to be invalid, the remaining part is still valid without affecting the validity of the remaining part.

The invalidity of a labor contract shall be confirmed by the labor dispute arbitration commission or the people's court.

So the overlord clause in the labor contract is invalid.