Recently, a strange thing happened in Xianyang, Shaanxi A man disguised as a woman found that his wife, Ms. Zhao, put the company's 700,000 yuan in cash in the trunk of the car, so after leaving, she opened the trunk with the spare key at home and took it away. This scene happened to be photographed by the surveillance. According to the man, he often rewards the anchor, and his credit card has been overdrawn by more than 200,000. In order to repay the debt, he moved his mind.

It was a ridiculous thing done by a ridiculous person. Fortunately, this 700,000 yuan has been fully recovered, otherwise Zhao Nvshi will not be able to explain to the company.

So, how to treat this incident from a legal perspective?

1. Does Ms. Zhao's husband steal 700,000 yuan from Zhao Nvshi's car constitute a crime? In this incident, 700,000 yuan in cash was taken as the property kept by Ms. Zhao on behalf of the company. Possession is everything? Property, 700,000 yuan in cash has been occupied by Zhao Nvshi and owned by him. Her husband totally violated his will and directly took 700,000 yuan by secret means, which violated Zhao Nvshi's ownership of public and private property, and her husband had obvious intention to steal subjectively, and the stolen 700,000 yuan reached a particularly huge standard, which belongs to the crime of theft stipulated in the criminal law.

However, according to the provisions of the judicial interpretation of theft, it is generally not considered a crime to steal the property of family members or close relatives and get forgiveness; Those who are investigated for criminal responsibility shall be treated leniently as appropriate.

Therefore, in this incident, if Ms. Zhao herself is willing to forgive her husband's theft, then this behavior cannot be regarded as a crime. Even if her husband is to be dealt with and investigated for criminal responsibility, she should be lenient as appropriate.

2. Should Zhao Nvshi undertake the obligation to repay the debt of 200,000 yuan overdrawn by her husband? In this case, whether Zhao Nvshi should undertake the repayment obligation depends on whether the 200,000 yuan belongs to the same debt of husband and wife.

According to Article 1 164 of the Civil Code of our country, there are two main types of debts between husband and wife. One is that both husband and wife sign the same name or one of them ratifies it afterwards, and so on. The other is the debt incurred by husband and wife in their own name for the daily life of the family during the relationship.

Therefore, in this incident, Ms. Zhao's husband rewarded the network anchor credit card for 200,000 yuan in his own name during the marriage relationship, which obviously exceeded the debt incurred by the family's daily life.

Therefore, this debt should belong to Zhao Nvshi's husband's marital personal debt, and Zhao Nvshi does not have to bear the repayment obligation.

In the last sentence, a gentleman loves money and takes it wisely. Although the money is kept by the wife for the company, it cannot be used at will or taken away by illegal means. Otherwise, the man's behavior will not only make him punished for breaking the law, but also make his wife, Ms. Zhao, bear the responsibility of guardianship and dereliction of duty and bear huge compensation costs. This is absolutely impossible.