I think it's still a test of everyone's ability to solve and deal with problems.

There is also a look at the candidates' grasp of the test sites given by the examiner in a short time.

1. Why do you want to apply for civil servants?

A: ① The relationship between people and work is based on self-knowledge. Through several years of work, I found my own personality characteristics: (omit, play by myself). My self-knowledge makes me feel that being a civil servant is the right choice.

I am an enterprising person, or a person with a strong sense of achievement. I don't like being idle. Civil servants have more activities and can meet different new problems. I think this is very challenging. I like challenges. My present job is relatively leisure. Although I can make up for my lack of leisure with other extensive hobbies, I am not satisfied with the working process.

I was brought up with a very traditional education. I like to help others and admire the integrity of the ancients. Civil servants have a wide range of social functions, and this position can enable me to realize my social ideals, so I have a strong interest and enthusiasm for this job. It is also for this reason that I would rather give up the high income of my current unit to apply for civil servants.

And my major is quite right. I was afraid of technical waste in my original unit.

I am a person with strong family values. My previous job was field construction, and I spent a lot of time outside, so I couldn't take care of my family. Applying for civil service can not only realize my ideal ambition, but also solve the problems between everyone and my family. Why not?

In a word, people are pursuing beautiful things and have their own career goals. My career goals can be achieved through civil servants.

2. What should I do if I am not accepted this time?

I think you will be safe when you come. That is, open your heart, accept it frankly, and don't judge heroes by success or failure. As long as you work hard and live up to your efforts, you don't have to care much about the final result. Neither complacent because of the past, nor lose confidence because of loss. We should learn more lessons and the advantages of other players to avoid similar problems in future work. At this time, it is a harvest and victory.

3. Q: Can you talk about your strengths and weaknesses?

Analysis: This question mainly examines candidates' correct understanding of the basic quality of talents and whether they can evaluate themselves comprehensively and objectively. From the examinee's answer to this question, the examiner can also see whether the examinee is confident (or arrogant and inferior).

Candidates should pay attention to the following points in addition to the above three points when answering:

Although this is your subjective evaluation, which is greatly influenced by personal confidence and value orientation, that is to say, the advantages and disadvantages you describe may not be in line with the actual situation, but your statement will affect the examiner's judgment of your ability to some extent. For example, candidates are modest and their language skills need to be improved. Therefore, although you are fluent in language, clear in structure and well-organized, and can make full use of nonverbal symbols in the interview, the examiner will be more or less influenced by the examinee's own negative conclusion when drawing a conclusion.

As a "social person", candidates actually have many advantages, such as diligent study, strong collective concept and good at analyzing problems. Interpersonal skills, even listening to your mother's words, and loyalty to love are also advantages, but candidates must highlight the key points: excellent characteristics and advantages related to the position they are applying for. If the advantages repeatedly emphasized by candidates are actually very general, it will be counterproductive. We should also start with these two points when talking about shortcomings, but the specific treatment is just the opposite; One is to "avoid reality and be empty" and talk about some trivial shortcomings, instead of exposing the major defects in your ability structure too frankly. The other is to talk about some shortcomings that have nothing to do with the job application. For example, candidates can frankly tell themselves that their ability to organize large-scale social activities is poor when applying for the file manager of a bureau's reference room. In addition, there is another way of "speculation", that is, one's own "security shortcomings", that is, those shortcomings that are shortcomings in some occasions, but may be advantages in other occasions. For example, it is difficult for you to get along with people who are irresponsible for their work, and work is often delayed because of perfection. But this "security loophole" can easily make experienced examiners think that you are "glib", so use it with caution!

Pay attention to your expression, manner and intonation when talking about advantages. Please keep a low profile. Sometimes you can express your hope and efforts to "go up a storey still higher"; When talking about your own shortcomings, don't stop at the shortcomings themselves, but focus on your determination and actions to overcome them.

(4) don't generalize, you can combine specific cases-although the examiner has no clear requirements.

⑤ Don't talk about more than three advantages (specifically or emphatically); It is not uncommon to talk about only one shortcoming.

4. What advantages do you think you have and what job do you think you are suitable for?

A: I never think I have any outstanding advantages. I think the most important achievement of my five years in college is that I have learned some methods to analyze problems and look at things. I study architectural design. In the design, especially in the design of large and complex public buildings, it often involves the simplification of some complex problems, and it often needs repeated verification from the whole to the part and from the part to the whole, so that I can grasp the main contradiction of the problem and find out the appropriate solution. I think it is good for me. In addition, in the study of architecture, the human factor is very important-architecture exists because of people, and people's feelings and feelings often need to be considered, so respecting people has become my habit of thinking. I think the above two points are very important, and they have extended to all aspects of my life. Generally speaking, I think I have strong ability to analyze and solve problems, and my oral and written expression skills are not bad. I think I am qualified for the job of secretary or other positions.

What would you do if the leader sent you on a business trip with a contradictory comrade? How do you deal with such things in your daily life? For example.

A: In daily life, contradictions are inevitable because everyone has different views and positions and has different ways of looking at and analyzing problems. If I am on a business trip with a comrade who has a problem with me, I think I should be honest first. Because there are contradictions, we will hide a lot of things, which will only deepen misunderstanding. If we are honest with each other and look at the problem with an objective and impersonal attitude, you will find that the ideas that you are very proud of are not completely correct. The views and opinions you opposed before may be just the other side of the same thing. You can complement each other and improve each other in many ways. Personally, I think we should have a tolerant attitude in dealing with contradictions. As the saying goes, the prime minister can punt in his stomach. Narrow-minded people are the enemy of solving contradictions, and narrow-minded people can never achieve great things.

In college, my roommates liked to spit in the dormitory. I don't like it very much, but he has a bad temper. If I tell him directly, the contradiction will intensify. I took the following measures: first, I euphemistically expressed my opposition to his spitting through other students; Secondly, I often put some books on the desk of the dormitory about the harm of spitting to myself and others' health for him to see. Third, I threw up when he was in the dormitory, but not in the dormitory, but outside, suggesting that he should throw up outside.

6. If you were a secretary of the township party committee and asked you to organize a meeting, what would you do?

A: If I am the secretary of the township party committee and organize the meeting, I will divide the meeting into three stages: first, the preparation stage before the meeting, mainly to thoroughly understand the spirit of the meeting, determine the meeting place, clarify the start and duration of the meeting, notify the people who need to attend the meeting, and prepare the written materials that need to be distributed at the meeting; The second stage is the convening stage of the meeting. At this stage, I mainly focus on the spirit of the meeting, arouse everyone's enthusiasm, make everyone give full play to their opinions on the problem, work together, fully understand the spirit and purpose of the meeting, and eliminate all kinds of limitations or misunderstandings in the bud; The third stage is the supervision and implementation after the meeting. The meeting has a specific purpose, but it is not for the sake of the meeting. The action after the meeting is the purpose of the meeting. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the supervision over whether measures are taken after the meeting and whether the measures are effective, and urge the implementation of those that do not meet the requirements.

7. Q: You are the newly appointed vice mayor. According to the resolution of the town government, you arranged a job for your subordinates. At the meeting, several subordinates gave reasons for not being able to implement it, which made you embarrassed. What should you do? "

A: The correct way is to listen to the different opinions of the masses with an open mind and carefully investigate and understand the situation in all aspects. If the questions raised are really reasonable, they can not be implemented for the time being, and it is a big problem to treat the opinions of the masses correctly.

8. As a leading cadre, what will you do when you meet the contradiction between the spirit of instructions from your superiors and the local actual situation? Three points can be made clear when thinking and preparing: first, study and study the spirit of instructions from superiors, understand the essence, and control the policy well;

Second, establish the concept of the overall situation, deploy work, obey the overall situation, be consistent with the CPC Central Committee, and order it to be banned;

Third, if the instructions of the higher authorities are found to be inconsistent with the actual situation of the region and the department, suggestions for improvement and implementation can be put forward to the higher authorities.

9. "The ancients said,' Don't doubt people, don't doubt people'. Do you adopt the view of' employing people without doubt' when using subordinate cadres? "

We should not simply affirm or deny this question. This old adage should be analyzed dialectically, which has both beneficial and unfavorable aspects.

(1) "No doubt about employing people" embodies the spirit and style of fully trusting and boldly using people after investigation, analysis and judgment, and it is necessary to influence and motivate users to produce the mental state of "a scholar dies for a confidant". However, it is not advisable to completely "doubt" employment, because the growth of users is constantly changing due to various factors, and

(2) The theory of "no doubt" takes things very seriously and tends to generalize, covering up subordinates with superiors, leading to laissez-faire, ignoring measures such as use, training, education, examination and supervision, and making changes to those who are hired. Therefore, the "doubt" and "no doubt" of correctly employing people are dialectical and should not be absolute.

10, "According to legend, there was a man named Liu Xiahui who lived in this hotel in ancient times. Due to the sudden cold that day, a woman living in a hotel froze to death. Liu held him in his arms and sat until dawn. No indecent acts. Analyze the enlightenment of this story of' sitting still' to leading cadres in politics. "

To answer this question, of course, the main thing is that leading cadres should have good conduct and decent style. But in addition, there are several inspirations from this story, such as being good at helping others, daring to break the customs, being determined, obeying the law and so on. What should be put forward in order to answer the original intention of the examination questions more satisfactorily and reflect a candidate's rich thinking and correct views on social problems and various situations.

1 1. "As a deputy, when studying problems with major leaders, you think your opinion is correct, but it was not adopted after it was put forward. How do you handle this situation? "

When you are thinking, you should be clear about the following ideas: first, treat the public fairly and calmly; Second, we should comprehensively analyze the correctness and feasibility of our own views; Third, if you confirm that your opinion is feasible, you can further reflect your statement to the main leaders; Fourth, after reflecting the statement, but still not recognized and supported, you can reserve your own opinions. If it is a major issue, you can reflect it to your superiors. When answering, expand your own views step by step, making them interlocking, thus increasing the declarative logic of questions and answers.

12, "Why can some units' three heads are better than one Zhuge Liang', while others' three monks have no water to drink'? If it is the latter case, what should you do when you take office? "

After listening to the topic, you can simply think about the experience of the previous unit "surpassing Zhuge Liang" and then think about the solution of the latter unit according to the requirements of the new situation. For example:

(1) Find the root cause and stimulate the resultant force; (2) rational use of people, from each according to his ability; (3) Clear responsibilities and rewards and punishments according to the system;

(4) Quota and posts, introducing competition mechanism. This question and answer closely combines the current situation and embodies new ideas.

13. at present, there are different disputes about the' last elimination system' implemented by some units. What do you think of this employment measure? "

The objective answer should be: "the last elimination system" is a transitional measure to the development of competition mechanism, which can be tried out; But it depends on the situation, not across the board. Moreover, the "last elimination system" is not completely equivalent to the competition mechanism. It is not bad for a large-scale unit with a large number of people to implement the competition mechanism first and then. If it is implemented in a small-scale unit with a small number of people, the effect may not be good, because some units do have a small number of people, and almost all the staff have worked hard and achieved good results, even neck and neck. If implemented, it will cause panic and interpersonal tension.

14. What will you do if you encounter setbacks?

A: Many people's beautiful ideas when their careers are smooth sailing are actually difficult to achieve smooth sailing. Accept the reality,

One's life can't be smooth sailing. There will be many hardships, pains and even setbacks behind success. It is normal to encounter some setbacks in life for a while. Only the accumulation of experience, knowledge and experience can shape a successful person. I think we should do the following in the face of setbacks:

First, we must dare to face it. We should get up where we fell. Comrade Xiaoping has three ups and downs. Don't be afraid of difficulties, dare to challenge them.

In addition, we should carefully analyze the causes of failure and find the root of failure. As the saying goes, failure is the mother of success. We should learn from setbacks and provide experience for the next rise.

In addition, we should strengthen our study in the usual work biochemistry, because a person's life is limited and it is impossible to experience everything, so we should learn from others' experience.

Finally, perhaps because the authorities are fascinated or lack knowledge and experience, I have no particularly good way to deal with setbacks, so I can only ask my relatives and friends to tide over the difficulties together.

15, which book do you like best?

I like reading. The first book a person reads may have a great influence on his life. The first book I read when I was a child was Romance of the Three Kingdoms, which was extensive and profound. Some characters described in the book have played a subtle role in my growth. Now it seems that I still like the romance of the Three Kingdoms best. If I like Guan Yu, it may be a bit vulgar, but Guan Yu's honesty and loyalty have always been highly respected by me. I think sincerity is the foundation of your life, and loyalty to the unit is the premise of your career. Of course, this loyalty also includes loyalty to leaders. From Zhou Yu, I learned to tolerate others and not be jealous. Learn from Zhuge Liang, strengthen your study and so on. The Romance of the Three Kingdoms is extensive and profound, and it has an all-round influence on me, so I won't go into details about the time.

16, no matter how poor you are, you can't be poor in education and you can't suffer children, understand?

Education is a century-long plan. The so-called "education before economy" is related to the rise and fall of a country and reflects the degree of social civilization. Therefore, the whole society should attach importance to education. Society is people-oriented, and only educated people will have economic prosperity. Especially now, with the rapid economic development in China, education should be placed in a prominent position, so that every child can study and read well.

No matter how hard it is, you can't suffer the children, because parents have come from a difficult environment. Now that life is good, there are fewer children and better material conditions, parents don't want their children to suffer any more. However, in the process of meeting children's basic conditions, we should also cultivate children's spirit of hard work, self-reliance and self-reliance, and we should not indulge and spoil them. We should put the cultivation of children's personality in the first place. Therefore, public opinion and parents' understanding should be comprehensive.

17,' Who doesn't talk about people behind their backs and who doesn't talk about people behind their backs'?

This is an objective fact, and everyone should face it squarely.

Everyone should first restrain himself and not talk about others behind their backs, especially his own shortcomings and privacy. This is immoral and not conducive to everyone's getting along.

(3) others' evaluation of themselves should be "corrected if there is nothing, and encouraged if there is nothing" and should not be blindly pursued. If major issues are involved, they should be pointed out in the case of adaptation.

(4) If the phenomenon behind the discussion in a unit is serious, the advantages and disadvantages should be explained to correct the atmosphere.

18, there is a saying in the history books: the investigation is unclear, which means not to think that others are inferior to yourself. What do you think of this?

In a threesome, there must be a teacher and a person must have a strong point. As long as you don't know what others know, you can learn from them. Don't be self-righteous, otherwise there is no chance of progress.

19, the ancients said: the public is bright, and sincerity is prestige. Please talk about your own views in combination with reality.

Being an official should proceed from the public interest, so as to handle the problem clearly, fairly and clearly. If you are honest, you can establish prestige among your colleagues and subordinates. This is a requirement for a cadre and a criterion for the success of an official. Therefore, in real life, we stress openness, justice and fairness, and require officials to do things for the public interest and the people; At the same time, cadres are required to put an end to corruption and maintain their image. If something goes wrong, we can find the right direction, and only honesty can resist corrosion.

20. A good system can bring out the benign aspects of people, and a bad system can turn good people into bad people. what do you think?

The quality of the system is not directly related to the quality of people. But the reaction relationship between them is not excluded.