Since the Japanese earthquake, the slogans of "nuclear pollution has no impact on China" and "nuclear pollution will have no impact on China in the next three days" have been ringing every day. Today, China is the only country in the world that has declared that the nuclear crisis has "no impact" on its own country. Even today, when the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant discharged 1. 1.5 million tons of sewage containing low-concentration radioactive substances into the sea, South Korea and Russia began to denounce, protest, sue and demand compensation, China still had "no influence". We can't help asking, what is this Chinese tolerance?
On March 25th, all the media in China reported as usual that "nuclear pollution will have no impact on China in the next three days". On this day, Huang Juan, a senior engineer of the Forecast Center of Beihai Branch of the State Oceanic Administration, analyzed the impact of the nuclear leakage of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant on the radioactive pollutants in the ocean and atmosphere in the eastern waters of China. Huang Juan thinks, "In the next 72 hours, the ocean current in the sea east of Japan will move to the northeast target, with a westerly wind at high altitude and a westerly wind at low altitude. Based on the premise of ocean and atmospheric dynamics, the primary influence area of radioactive materials in the incident is the eastern part of Japan and the northwest Cheng Pingyang area to its east, which does not have the premise of directly affecting China to the west. "
However, the facts are ruthless. On March 26th, China National Nuclear Accident Emergency Coordination Committee released a message that a trace radioactive nuclear element iodine-13 1 particle was found in the northeast of Heilongjiang. On March 27th, six provinces and cities in Shanghai, Anhui, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Guangdong and Guangxi detected extremely small amounts of radioactive nuclear elements. On March 29th, iodine-13 1 particles were found in Shandong, Hebei and Beijing. On March 30th, China 18 provinces and cities detected a very small amount of radioactive substances, and Sichuan and Chongqing detected radioactive substances for the first time. In April 1 day, a very small amount of radiation was detected in all provinces in China.
Then, the absurd thing came. China experts, who said that nuclear pollution would not float, turned to keep silent about "the wind blows eastward". Instead, it is said that "the possible additional radiation dose to the public is less than one thousandth of the natural background radiation dose of natural radiation sources such as rocks, soil, buildings, food and the sun, which is equivalent to one thousandth of the cosmic ray exposure when flying by plane for 2000 kilometers. It will not affect the environment and public health, and no protective measures are needed."
China experts have taken pains to excuse the harm of Japanese nuclear radiation to China, making the world cry for it, which has reached the point where they do not hesitate to importune. For example, the bizarre theory that "nuclear pollutants from Fukushima, Japan, travel westward to China through atmospheric circulation, and then radiate to China after circling the earth" is put forward. Is that really the case? People with a little knowledge of geography should know that if radiation reaches China after circling the earth, it should first reach western China, such as Urumqi, Lanzhou, Xining and Lhasa, and finally reach the northeast and southeast coasts. But the opposite is true. According to the order in which radioactive materials were discovered in China, they first reached the nearest northeast region, then the southeast coast, and then entered North China, Southwest China and Northwest China. The statement that nuclear radiation "travels around the earth and reaches China" is totally untrue.
When the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant discharged 1. 1.5 million tons of sewage containing low-concentration radioactive substances into the sea, the Chinese-style tolerance that "has little influence on China" once again made people want to cry.
Qiu, an expert from China Nanhai Fisheries Research Institute, said that the quality of seafood in the South China Sea will not be affected by nuclear leakage;
According to CCTV, Chen Xiaoqiu, a researcher at China Nuclear and Radiation Safety Center, believes that the low-radiation sewage discharged by Tokyo Electric Power Company will not cause much damage to the surrounding environment. In addition, the concentration of these low-radiation sewage is low, which is far from China and will not affect China's coastal areas.
Teng Jianqun, an expert on China's nuclear issue, told the Global Times reporter that Japanese sewage would not affect China. The nuclear sewage discharged into seawater this time is only discharged for a short time, and at the same time, due to the influence of the ocean current east of Japan, radioactive materials will flow eastward to the Pacific Ocean with the ocean current. At the same time, radiation will be reduced due to ocean current disturbance, which has little impact on China's coastal areas;
When the United States, thousands of miles away, found radioactive substances in drinking water, China was still superstitious about "blowing the west wind". Alas, are China people really invulnerable?
Chinese-style tolerance was manifested incisively and vividly as early as the end of World War II: not paying a penny; Preferential treatment for Japanese prisoners; "Japan is also a victim"; Wait, just say that World War II "had little influence on China". Nowadays, in the face of the huge nuclear crisis in human society, the argument of "little influence on China" is rampant. What's the ulterior motive?
Worry about five
1.TEPCO claims that in order to ensure enough space to store high-level radioactive sewage, the low-level radioactive sewage in the "centralized waste treatment facility" is discharged into the sea. Assuming this statement is true, how to deal with the sewage with high concentration of radioactive materials stored twice? Is it discharge or storage for ten thousand years? If it is discharged, where will it be discharged? Who will believe it if it is stored for 10 thousand years?
2. According to the * * news agency, the Atomic Energy Safety and Security Agency of Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry said on the 5th that the high-level radioactive sewage in the turbine house and external shaft of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant 1-3 unit is estimated to be about 60,000 tons. Previously, TEPCO claimed that the reason why 1. 1.5 million tons of sewage containing low-concentration radioactive substances were discharged into the sea was to provide space for sewage containing high-concentration radioactive substances. Then, how can a space of 1. 1.5 million tons hold 60,000 tons? What if I can't save it?
3. How credible is Japan's external information? According to public information, everyone is restricted from entering within 30 kilometers of Fukushima, and journalists cannot enter at all. The Japanese side also refused the intervention of foreign experts. All sources of information depend on the Japanese government and Tokyo Electric Power Company. How convincing is this? For example, on April 2nd, some experts have detected radioactive iodine 13 1 of 300,000 Bekkerel per cubic centimeter in seawater, which is 7.5 million times of the legal standard. This shows that the high-concentration radioactive materials released by nuclear reactors have flowed into the sea, and the information obtained by go-vern ment in Japan is that these high-concentration radioactive materials were measured in the outer shaft.
Fourth, what is the standard of "no impact on human health"? Is there only one kind of life on the earth? Does it affect fish? Does it affect birds? Does it affect microorganisms? Man is just a link in the biological chain of the earth. If one link in other biological chains breaks, human beings will still suffer. Therefore, it is extremely absurd to take "no impact on human health" as the emission standard.
5. If we continue to say that "nuclear pollution has no impact on China", it will seriously affect the credibility of go-vern-ment, and there will be endless future troubles.
Among the five worries, the third worry is the most worrying. The people who have the same understanding with me are Russian. On April 4th, a public opinion survey released by the All-Russian Center for Public Opinion Research showed that 8 1% of Russians believed that the information released by the Japanese authorities about the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant was not credible and was lying.