Although the Football Association said it was separation of management and operation, it was not. For example, can the China Football Association determine the head coach of the China football team? Candidates must be approved by higher authorities. In fact, the Basketball Association is the same. It is not for Yao Ming to decide such an important matter as changing the head coach. China doesn't do well in basketball either. Let's see who we have an advantage over in the Men's Basketball World Cup. What's the use of decentralization Basketball in China, like football in China, is a systematic problem of youth training. China's men's soccer reserve force is not good, and there are few players. The poor ability of Chinese basketball players is due to the problems in the training methods and systems they received during their youth training.
Give you a number. 20 19, the super bonus, 16 clubs each about 670 million, the Football Association got 600 million, 600 million. I won't talk about League A, the adjustment fee for signing, the profit of Futebao under the Football Association and other income.
Why did the Football Association score so many points? Because the shares of the Super League are like this, each club is 4%, 16 clubs are 64%, and the Football Association is 36%. In other words, the bonus of the Football Association is nine times that of the club. On the one hand, it explains why China Club can't make a profit, because there are vampires, and it also explains why the Football Association doesn't let go.
In addition to the league dividends, the Football Association also controls the venue advertisements, some jerseys advertisements of the club, and the annual appearance fees of various national teams. Roughly speaking, the annual income of the Football Association is close to 800 million. And these are all pure profits. Tell me, what can make more money than this? Why did the Football Association let go?
The Football Association collects so much money every year. What is it used for?
A considerable part was handed over to the General Administration of Sports, which used the money to support other sports. There is no way to obtain funds for many sports, and the state cannot allocate funds indefinitely. In order to achieve political achievements, the General Administration of Sports always hopes to achieve zero breakthrough in some sports, so it must invest a lot of money. Where does the money come from? You have to rely on these profitable sports.
In fact, our outlook on sports achievements should be changed. Those projects with weak mass base should be solved by themselves. It is of little significance for the country to spend a lot of money to train gold medals. I really hope that people like Li Na can appear more often, enjoy themselves, train themselves, sponsor themselves and play their own games. Every sport should be allowed to make money by its own efforts, instead of counting on football to suck blood, because football actually needs funds to invest in training.
In fact, this problem does not exist in essence, but lies in the superior organizations of the Football Association and Basketball Association and the General Administration of International Sports. I want to be fair to the Football Association here. In fact, the Football Association is very angry with the splint now. They are the founders of higher organizations, as well as punching bags for fans and the media. Once there is a problem, the Football Association must be the first to be scolded, and then people will explore the deeper reasons. Just like the physical test events in the Tokyo Olympic trials caused controversy, it was actually decided by the leaders of the State Sports General Administration. The sports associations under their jurisdiction only act according to the requirements of the leaders and do not have much decision-making power. In other words, many times the decisions made by the Football Association are not what the Football Association wants to do. I think we must figure out this problem first.
However, this is not an excuse for the Football Association. You know, we always emphasize that professional people do professional things. Yao Ming's takeover of chinese basketball association is a good example. At the same time, under his leadership, CBA league is also in full swing, which shows that the domestic basketball atmosphere is still very good in recent years. But obviously, there is no similar practice in football. It is "very professional" to be able to choose a former president of the Super League club as the president of the Football Association. At least Chen Haoyuan really participated in professional football in the past. Compared with previous bosses of China Football Association, this is an improvement.
As for the decentralization mentioned by the subject, it should refer to the efforts of the Football Association from the national team to the league. The fundamental reason is that there is no real professional league and players' union in our professional league, and the operation of professional league has embarked on a very unprofessional track. If there is no accident, a professional league will be established in the new season, and we will see how it works then.
Text/Sit-ups-Zhang Yangyuan
As the biggest sport in the world, football has more influence than basketball. The corresponding economic value is greater.
Interests! Interests! Interests! It is conceivable that the interests of the Super League were taken away by the Football Association by 36%! It is also doomed that the club cannot make a profit and the Football Association cannot delegate power. It is also doomed that the establishment of major football leagues is far away. It is also doomed that the professional football league in China can't develop normally, and the real professional football has become four elephants, which has hindered the development of football in China and become a deadlock! The Football Association never thought that, in fact, the establishment of a major professional league through decentralization and decentralization only accounts for 10% of the dividends, making the professional league bigger and stronger, but with more 10%, the whole game of football in China will live. The whole football market in China is too big, which is completely equivalent to the sum of La Liga, Bundesliga, Premier League, Ligue 1 and Serie A. The economic and social benefits are unimaginable! It is really that the China Football Association is too short-sighted and rigid, which really hinders the development of football in China! Alas! Alas! Alas! Wasted 10 years, 20 years. If we don't make changes, China football will go downhill!
The meat in a dog's mouth is hard to give up.
Because this cake is so tempting. Just like the men's basketball team, many people will be out, and no one will give up for pure interests. Participate from top to bottom, because the performance of the national football team has been too poor for a long time, so there is no pressure from anyone to come up, just shout slogans, and if it doesn't work, hand it over to the successor. Anyway, there will be no accountability. But the interests were put there by Lolo, and many forces were intertwined, and no one wanted to give up. I can't figure out the specific economic account, but compared with basketball, volleyball and other projects, it can't be compared, so professional leagues just shout slogans and won't last long. There is no players' union. The separation of management and operation has been impossible for many years, which is quite good. In fact, it is still concentrated on one hand. This is not the same as basketball.
There is a simple reason. Football has great influence and high social effect. As long as you don't delegate, you will hold on to the money rope. Developing football is a cover, and economic benefits are the key. In short, it's all about money.
Why doesn't the Football Association delegate power? This question is difficult to answer, because football is too rich, and the title fee of Guangchao will be 8 billion in five years. Do you think the Football Association is willing to decentralize, or will it offend people if it is clear?