Comprehensive evaluation refers to the formulation of a series of quantitative indicators and implementation rules for college students' moral, intellectual and physical aspects, usually once a semester. It is an important basis and reference for college students' scholarships, the selection of three good students and the employment of graduates, and it is a job closely related to every college student. However, due to the defect of artificial complete quantification, comprehensive evaluation has entered an embarrassing situation of "students' exclusion and teachers' headache"

1. The evaluation system is imperfect and the index setting is unreasonable.

In the "comprehensive evaluation method" of most colleges and universities, moral education, intellectual education and physical education are regarded as three basic indicators in the index system, and corresponding scores are given. If we analyze this framework system with the ideas and concepts of quality education advocated at present, we will find the limitations of this framework system:

First, the standards of moral education are conceptualized. The comprehensive evaluation system for college students can be qualitative or quantitative, but as an evaluation mechanism, it rejects the concept slogan. Colleges and universities lack the spirit of keeping pace with the times and the consciousness of pioneering and innovating when formulating students' moral education goals and standards, and most of them stay on the slogan of "adhering to the four cardinal principles", with clear concepts and vague specific standards, which leads everyone to get full marks in this score and deny individual differences in the moral level of the subject.

Secondly, there are differences in the standards of intellectual education.

2. There is a big deviation between the evaluation system and the social requirements for the quality of college graduates.

At present, when selecting college graduates, employers not only look at academic performance, but also selectively put forward requirements for political quality, innovative consciousness, enterprising spirit, cooperative spirit and collective honor, foreign language, computer level, innovative ability, logical thinking ability, practical ability and communicative ability.

3. There are loopholes in the operation of the evaluation system, which is not conducive to quality education.

In most colleges and universities, the comprehensive evaluation score = moral education score+intellectual education score+physical education score+reward and punishment score. Moral education is assessed by counselors, class teachers and student cadres. In order to get higher moral education scores, some students try to leave a good impression on their teachers by forming gangs among their classmates and making superficial articles, which also gives some counselors, class teachers and student cadres who participated in the evaluation a great right to speak, and also gives birth to some bad behaviors of respecting teachers in various ways.

Second, the objective basis for reconstructing the comprehensive evaluation index system of college students

The purpose of the comprehensive evaluation system for college students is to formulate specific objective evaluation criteria with both purpose and regularity through rational thinking according to the party's educational policy and school's educational objectives, taking into account students' moral cultivation and students' will quality; Considering the accumulation of students' humanistic knowledge and the cultivation of students' humanistic spirit;

3. Thinking about improving the comprehensive evaluation system for college students We should strive to do the following:

1. The principle of combining quantitative evaluation with qualitative analysis.

2. Establish and improve universities