For example, if someone likes a team and the team wins a big game, he is very happy. But it doesn't matter whether this team wins or not.

The same is true of becoming a Buddha. Some people long for becoming a Buddha, some people hate becoming a Buddha, and some people have no idea what becoming a Buddha is.

There is no meaning in the world, because our hearts are moving, so it is meaningful.

If you can become a Buddha, then everything in the world is meaningless and meaningful, which makes people suddenly realize. Do you think it makes sense?

Assuming that all beings become Buddhas, there are naturally no six paths, but there is no such ideal situation. Just as a vacuum cannot be created, there will always be dust.

Lz needs me to try to refute the following:

Let me first summarize the viewpoint of anonymous 9- 18.

1, it is impossible to become a Buddha.

Buddhism is just a lie.

3. Buddhism has no theoretical system of its own.

The birth of Buddhism is a compromise to oppression.

The following refutes one by one:

1. Is it impossible to become a Buddha alone?

You can't talk too much about Buddhism. You don't think you can become a Buddha. No matter how much you tell him about Buddhism, you are casting pearls before swine. But the landlord is different. Since the landlord began to think about the meaning of becoming a Buddha, it was obviously a fate. It is very important to take the first step to become a Buddha. Otherwise you won't come out of the well, and your world will always be so big. Inside the well is the realm of man, and only when you get out of the well can you get closer to the realm of Buddha. As Zhuangzi said, how can a sparrow know Dapeng's ambition?

2. Is Buddhism a lie?

This view is actually consistent with the first one. Since it is impossible to become a Buddha, it is naturally deceptive to persuade people to become a Buddha.

For example, there is a person standing on a ship that may sink at any time. The man on the shore handed him a bamboo pole and said, Come on up, your boat is sinking. But the people on the boat said that my boat is so beautiful and expensive that I won't abandon it. You lied when you said it was going to sink, and you lied when you said it was safe to land.

People standing on the shore naturally know where it is safe and where it is dangerous, but if the people on board insist that the ship is the safest, everyone else is a liar, and there is nothing they can do.

3. Buddhism has no theoretical system of its own.

Buddhist classics are not too few, but too many, as theoretical as any theoretical science.

But Buddhism really doesn't need so many theories. There is a word called dharma. Simply put, all theories are just a door on the road to becoming a Buddha. Six ancestors used to point to the moon to explain the relationship between Buddhist scriptures and truth. Buddhist scriptures only point out where the truth is, but Buddhist scriptures themselves are not truth, just as fingers only point out where the moon is, but fingers are not the moon, so you don't have to look at the moon through your fingers.

If many people like to think of their fingers as the moon now, this is a misunderstanding of many people.

No matter what new scientific theory a wise man cites to prove the correctness of Buddhism, it is all right, because it is just another finger pointing to the moon. Or take a piece of wood and aim the rocket at the moon.

The moon is the moon. Seeing the moon is not far from becoming a Buddha.

The birth of Buddhism is a compromise to oppression.

What will happen if you succeed in resisting oppression? Only the oppressed become the oppressor, and the oppressed become the oppressed. What is the difference between these changes? What's the use?

True wisdom is not to teach people to oppress others, but to teach all the oppressors and the oppressed. In addition to this relationship, there is a more harmonious relationship. Otherwise, human beings can only kill each other in the quagmire of oppression and oppression forever.