To answer this question, we should start with the development trend of China's wealth management industry in recent years. China's wealth management industry is at a critical stage of overall acceleration and maturity; It has become common knowledge in the industry that the business model will change from "sales of wealth management products" to "investment model driven by customer demand" and from "sales of own products" to "open product platform". After the rise of buyer's investment, various institutional investment businesses have been transformed into "buyers", especially since the fund investment business started the pilot. "Buyer's investment" is no longer a simple slogan, but more regarded as a set of business logic, which focuses on the length of time that customers participate in services, the recognition of investment income and risk tolerance, and the final service satisfaction. Around this series of goals, the business behavior of financial institutions will also undergo tremendous changes, from traditional product sales to providing asset allocation and scientific investment services. Institutions that do not conform to the development trend of the industry will definitely be eliminated by the market. As many institutions as 18 have made smart investments, how many institutions have done as well as the financial Rubik's Cube?

This may be the reason why the Financial Rubik's Cube put forward the 3C investment standard. Judging from the actual performance, the financial Rubik's Cube is really good. I used the financial Rubik's Cube from 17 to now, and I have done it for 20 years. I am quite satisfied with this achievement. Although the overall market is not good now, it is generally believed that it has reached a low point, which will also be a good time to wait for the callback to make a profit?