Since the 1950s, China has been implementing the policy of "low wages and more employment", which has played an important role in alleviating unemployment and ensuring the basic livelihood of workers. I think this is a policy of seeking truth from facts and winning the hearts of the people. China is the country with the largest population and the greatest employment pressure in the world. Survival is the greatest human right. It is the unshirkable responsibility of the ruling party and the people's government to do their utmost to ensure the employment of the masses to the maximum extent.

However, in the past 30 years, this policy of seeking truth from facts has been completely subverted and replaced by cold and even bloody slogans such as "competition" and "elimination". In China, a country with the largest population and the greatest employment pressure in the world, the slogans of "competition" and "elimination" are the loudest. Moreover, dare to "eliminate" 30 million old employees under the leadership of the government. So it has formed the most peculiar phenomenon in the world today. Its rationality and fairness are increasingly questioned and criticized.

"Competition" and "elimination" came with the slogan of reform, covered with aura and carrying the sword on the side, and they were invincible for a time. However, things in the world do not depend on people's subjective will, and everything has advantages and disadvantages. Whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages or the disadvantages outweigh the advantages should be tested by practice and evaluated by the people. When "competition" and "elimination" are completely alienated into "the law of the jungle", it will tear its aura. Even public enterprises such as public transport under the guidance of the government are advocating "unmanned ticket sales". Does this embarrassing disregard for China's population of 65.438+300 million really mean that they want to benefit the people? People began to bring up the old saying "three meals for five people".

Jumping from one extreme to the other is magnificent, decisive and brilliant, and the fate of ordinary people groans under these decisive momentum and brilliance. We want to ask: Can its rationality and justice really stand the scrutiny of history?