The Chief Justice of the Ministry of Justice of Taiwan Province Province will explain the case of "same-sex marriage" at 4pm yesterday, which is expected to protect same-sex marriage on the island.
Before the constitution was promulgated, anti-gay and pro-gay groups were ready. Over the past few days, anti-gay groups have been protesting against the "justice" of supporting same-sex marriage in front of the "court" in Taiwan Province Province. In addition to sitting quietly and shouting slogans, they also hung up a white cloth strip that "the interpretation of the constitution" has no credibility and the "interpretation of the constitution" procedure is illegal. The police have stationed police forces and erected iron horse guardrails.
Qi Jiawei, one of the organizations and claimants, will hold a series of activities such as a press conference near the Legislative Yuan today to show that the battlefield will return to the Legislative Yuan again after the "justice" account.
Many "legislators" and relevant authorities are waiting for the "judge's explanation, hoping to provide a clear direction for the next revision of the law. However, how to interpret the interpretation of "judge" by different groups will be another test of justice.
According to the Law on Judges' Trial of Cases, two-thirds of the total number of judges should attend the interpretation of the Constitution, and two-thirds of the attendees agreed that the "judges" who participated in the "Marriage Interpretation of the Constitution" did not include Huang Ruiming, a "judge" who avoided because his wife was particularly beautiful as a legislator, and fourteen "judges" participated.
At present, the fourteen "justices" are half from academic circles and half from judicial practice. There is almost no doubt that gay marriage should be protected. As for what kind of protection should be taken? Whether the current "civil law" allows same-sex marriage, etc. Recently, the debate among the "justices" is fierce and almost cautious, including the title and wording of each paragraph, and even the punctuation marks have been revised over and over again. In addition to explanations, there will be "judges" who will issue letters of disagreement and cooperative opinions.
、