They refute your point of view from two aspects: first, bad books and periodicals such as pornographic books and periodicals; Second, reading too much will lead students to form bad habits, induce people to commit crimes and affect their health.

For the first question, you can refute "please note that our argument is conducive to opening books, not reading pornographic books." The premise of this volume is a book that is beneficial to us. Does the opposing debater often read such books? Please don't misunderstand us. Of course, the other debater may have read a good book, but it is not enough, so his understanding ability is somewhat biased. Never mind, pay more attention to understanding. Secondly, according to the understanding of other debaters, can we understand that our teacher advocates us to do more exercise because it is good for our health? Fighting is also a sport, so should I respond to the teacher's call and go over and fight the other debater? I think that's what I mean; Third, although the problem of pornographic books and periodicals exists, and many people read pornographic books and periodicals under the banner of opening books, it is not a problem of opening books, but a problem of personal quality. If the other debater has been obsessed with this issue, it means that the other debater has not understood our debate at all! ! Like a glass of water. If I put laxatives in this glass of water and another debater drinks diarrhea, don't blame me, because the idea of finding you should blame this glass of water for being wrong! " Debate is a complete blow to each other's confidence and spirit. Don't feel rude. They are your enemies for the time being. Being kind to the enemy is being cruel to yourself! ! !

Let's talk about the second problem first, the problem of transition. Similarly, you can refute them. "Other debaters, reading useful books and periodicals is beneficial. I think the other debater should have no doubt about this. As for the transition, isn't it strange? Calling on students to study together is a slogan and a call, which is conducive to improving their own quality. A series of problems caused by excessive reading indicate that readers are not good. It's not that the book is bad. According to another debater's understanding, it would be nice to eat so many vegetables. We advocate eating more vegetables. Should we not touch meat at all? Then I think the other debater should stop arguing with us here and become a nun. Maybe if you work hard, more Father Tang will come. " Similarly, we should also explore their views, and then introduce a contradictory view according to their views, and that's it!

Finally, I want to tell you that I don't know what your argument is, but no matter what your argument is, you must be calm and don't be stumped by the other party's question. If you can't answer each other's questions, don't be cold. At this time, you can say, "What the other party just said is acceptable, which means that our serious teaching has worked, but you don't have to thank me." This is what we should do. "