Secondly, is there a problem with management? If the "policy line" has not changed, it can only be management, that is to say, the management level has declined. For example, the pollution problem in the construction site. If the project can't be completed, then the pollution of the construction site can always be avoided as much as possible, right? There are rules for dust prevention and leakage prevention. However, what is the implementation of the regulations? What about the required supervision? Obviously, management has not kept up. Another example is the problem of illegal construction. Nowadays, no matter where you walk in the city, you may find the existence of illegal construction, whether on the side of the avenue or in the community. I haven't heard of it before, and even shouted the slogan of "renovation year", and the result is getting worse and worse. The key is that the management of dragonflies and a gust of wind is not enough, so that minor illnesses accumulate into serious illnesses. Another example is the problem of occupying the road at will. Street vendors, barbecues, doormen and cars occupy the road, which not only occupy the road, but also pollute the environment. Those who occupy the road fight guerrilla warfare, because those in power also fight guerrilla warfare. If the chief executive is persistent, can those who occupy the road fight guerrilla warfare? In addition, there are a lot of phenomena, such as the destruction of woodland and green space. Needless to say, active discovery and active management often go away after receiving reports. Isn't this kind of management a bit useless?

The environment in Dalian has become the "worst", and the government should reflect on it most. The "worst" is largely caused by the government itself. Now if the government wants to clean up the environment, it must first clean up itself.