First, extend the purchase subsidy and exemption from purchase tax for new energy vehicles for two years;

Second, the central government adopts the method of substituting awards for subsidies to support key areas such as Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei to eliminate diesel trucks with emission standards of national III and below;

The third is to sell used cars to used car distribution companies. /kloc-From May to the end of 2023, the value-added tax will be levied at a reduced rate of 0.5% of the sales.

The State Council's new policy is undoubtedly a shot in the arm for the new energy automobile industry whose market has been declining since July 2065438+2009. After 20 19 shouted the slogan of saving the market for a year, the government finally came up with a real policy of saving the market.

A stable policy is the guarantee of industrial development, and the cliff-like subsidy retreat is not conducive to the healthy development of the industry. The extension of subsidies is of great significance not only to the pure electric vehicle industry, but also to fuel cell vehicles belonging to new energy vehicles.

The continuation of subsidies will stimulate auto companies to increase investment.

Regarding the subsidy policy for fuel cell vehicles, the Ministry of Finance has suggested that on the one hand, it is recommended to recover subsidies on time, on the other hand, it is suggested to strengthen the guidance of non-fiscal policies such as unlimited new energy vehicles, no lottery, and convenient road rights.

The implication is that the subsidy policy for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles should be withdrawn on time on 20021together with pure electric vehicles. As soon as the proposal of the Ministry of Finance was put forward, it caused a heated discussion in the hydrogen energy industry.

Subsidies are a shot in the arm and stimulant. China's new energy automobile industry can be said to be promoted by the huge subsidy policy. Some insiders have suggested that if the subsidy policy for fuel cell vehicles is introduced on time in 20021,the necessity of formally introducing the subsidy policy for fuel cell vehicles that was not introduced in 20 19 will be greatly reduced, the enthusiasm of car companies to develop hydrogen fuel cell vehicles will be greatly reduced, and the promotion of fuel cell vehicles with higher costs at present will also be hindered to some extent.

The decision of the the State Council executive meeting temporarily eliminated the worries of some people in the industry, set the tone for continuing financial support, and established the development prospect of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles to a certain extent, thus attracting more regions to join the ranks of developing hydrogen energy industry and attracting more capital to enter the hydrogen energy industry.

Since the special subsidy policy for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles has not yet been issued, the subsidy for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles will probably be implemented according to 0.8 times of the 20 18 policy. If the local government can subsidize according to the ratio of 1: 1, a fuel cell vehicle can still get a financial subsidy of up to 800,000 yuan. At present, the price of a fuel cell bus generally does not exceed 2 million, which has exceeded the original subsidy for pure electric buses.

In the overall downturn of the automobile market, a large number of automobile enterprises are facing severe market tests, and the field of highly subsidized hydrogen energy vehicles is likely to become a new "safe haven".

It can be predicted that under the background of subsidy determination, the domestic hydrogen energy automobile market will usher in a period of rapid growth in the past two years.

In the absence of top-level design, can subsidies really promote the healthy development of hydrogen energy industry?

There have been different voices in the industry about subsidies. Some insiders believe that the existence of huge subsidies will attract a large number of speculators, lead to a large number of low-level redundant construction, and eventually ruin the industry. Pure electric vehicles and photovoltaics are typical examples.

Household appliances, mobile phones, panels, communication equipment and other industries have proved that subsidies are not a necessary condition for the rise of the industry. The subsidy for electric vehicles can only play its full role under the background of "establishing a technical route based on pure electricity". Subsidy is a catalyst, not the fundamental reason for the rapid development of the industry.

Not all enterprises want subsidies, but all enterprises want scientific industrial support policies.

Healthy development of the industry, top-level design first. Without scientific top-level design, it is difficult for the hydrogen energy industry to develop healthily only by subsidies. A series of problems that really need to be solved in a series of industries, such as the approval of hydrogen refueling station construction, management standards for hydrogen storage and transportation, and industrial safety management standards, can be solved without subsidies.

Taking the "chicken and egg" hydrogen refueling station as an example, the high cost is not the most important problem that hinders the construction of hydrogen refueling stations, but the approval process is the biggest obstacle.

"For the construction and management of hydrogen refueling stations, there is no specific supervision or approval department at the top. In some places, the approval process of a hydrogen refueling station needs to cover nearly 30 official seals. " Some companies say so. "Sometimes you don't know which department to go to. The whole project runs for one year, and the approval runs to your lap. " Even in Zhangjiakou, which has the greatest support for the development of hydrogen energy industry, Hebei Petroleum has been running for more than a year to apply for a hydrogen refueling station.

As for a series of basic problems related to industrial development, such as the management of hydrogen leaving hazardous chemicals, the civil use of liquid hydrogen, hydrogen production in the station, etc., it can not be solved by simple subsidies.

Under the premise that the policy signal has been made clear, it is urgent for the hydrogen energy industry to formulate a national industrial policy and clarify the development path of the industry, so as to promote the solution of a series of industrial basic problems, rather than squeezing toothpaste-like scattered support policies. Subsidies have a limited effect on the hydrogen energy industry before the country has defined relevant industrial policies and put forward top-level design.

According to the Opinions on Accelerating the Establishment of Green Production and Consumption Laws and Policies recently issued by the National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Justice, the standards and supporting policies for the development of new energy sources such as hydrogen energy and ocean energy will not be completed until 20021year. This undoubtedly lags behind the overall development speed of the hydrogen energy industry.

Without top-level design, subsidies can't really promote the rapid development of hydrogen fuel cell automobile industry. How to establish a scientific policy system for hydrogen energy industry is the most concerned issue for the current hydrogen energy industry.

This article comes from car home, the author of the car manufacturer, and does not represent car home's position.