The British demanded that the Qing government protect the interests of the British and China people who were connected with or served the British.
First, the naked aggression treaty of treaty of nanking cannot be erased.
Those people with ulterior motives take Britain's request to the Qing government to protect people's property and freedom as an example, which has ulterior motives.
It sounds as if the British are here to help China realize human rights.
Don't say that the Chinese version doesn't have this clause. Even if there is, it is only used to show morality and show that aggression is just.
In the American Declaration of Independence, American sages said that "all men are created equal, and the creator endowed everyone with certain inalienable rights, including life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."
Then we talked about how Britain oppressed the North American colonies.
This is to highlight the justice of North America's resistance to Britain.
Even if Britain asked the Qing government to protect freedom in treaty of nanking, it would not change its aggressive nature.
This is an unequal treaty with aggressive nature. If China people forget this, they will put the cart before the horse.
2. The treaty of nanking is a treaty that Britain decides the result of its aggression.
For the British, the treaty of nanking confirmed the achievements of the Opium War launched by Britain in the form of a treaty.
The privileges granted by treaty of nanking and its annexes have facilitated Britain's further expansion of commodity dumping and capital export to China, as well as its economic plunder to China. Meanwhile.
This also promoted its political control and cultural infiltration in China.
We don't rule out that British people can borrow treaty of nanking according to their own needs, such as the London Gazette, and publish treaty of nanking and its full text.
In order to beautify itself and show morality, Britain can be said to ask the Qing government to protect people's property freedom.
The hypocrisy and double standards of the colonists are not new now.
If China people are still obsessed with Britain's requirements for the protection of freedom and property in the Qing Dynasty, it can be seen that the remnants of British cultural infiltration still exist.