In the problem, Party A put forward improper requirements, and the construction unit carried out the construction under the condition of incomplete drawings, resulting in errors, and the construction unit should bear the main responsibility. Specific to the construction unit, the project manager is mainly responsible. The supervision unit is ineffective in supervision and bears corresponding responsibilities. If the construction unit (Party A) has issued relevant documents in advance, the construction unit will also bear part of the responsibility.
Some friends think it's "Party A's responsibility", but I don't think so. It is normal for the construction unit to require that the construction period be shortened as much as possible. The more urgent Party A is, the more it has to perform its duties. In operation, "carelessness" and "not asking" are the direct causes of trouble. The engineering team in Degang Guo Crosstalk turned the drawings of "drilling wells" upside down and built a "chimney". Can you blame Party A for pushing too hard and not seeing the drawings clearly?
After the event, contact the design unit as soon as possible to discuss the solution. Due to a series of non-technical factors, such as design modification and re-approval, and design modification cost, whether the problem can be solved efficiently and economically cannot be assumed out of thin air.
In order to survive and develop, the construction unit is under pressure from all sides, but this is not a reason to violate the principle. Emotion can't replace the law, and problems and accidents won't happen because of good subjective will! "Quality is life, responsibility is more important than Mount Tai" is not just a slogan.