This question is a bit difficult to answer. After all, modern higher education has developed for so many years, and since it still exists, it has its own reasons. Don't you see how important college students are in the 1980s and 1990s? However, with the expansion of colleges and universities, the decline of the quality of higher education is an inevitable trend, and the expansion of teachers and hardware facilities can not keep up with the expansion of students. For example, it turns out that one teacher is in charge of 10 students. During the experimental class, students have enough equipment and space to do experiments, and they can ask questions at any time if they don't understand. Now a teacher has twenty or thirty students, how can the quality be guaranteed?

There is also the students' self-awareness: most of the original college students cherish the opportunity to go to college and naturally study hard. There are not many people who can do this now, are there?

Then there is the school policy: for students: as long as they don't make trouble; For teachers, as long as they do their own projects well, everything will be fine. ...

Social responsibility; We talk about quality education, but we are still offering some Olympic math classes, a cram school and a cram school.

Undeniably, there are still many schools that still adhere to the idea of running excellent schools, but they are at the end of their tether. This may be the reason why our country has been shouting the slogan of building a world-class university for so many years, but there is still no one. ...

It's a bit messy, just looking around.