Current location - Quotes Website - Team slogan - What is our attitude towards social transformation?
What is our attitude towards social transformation?
"In my opinion, any tradition will gradually change with the passage of time. The so-called loss of traditional culture is now a normal phenomenon in my opinion. Because economic strength, culture and politics mutually determine the promotion of this culture, why do we feel that China is gradually westernized, and traditional moral traditions are losing, because we have been weakened economically, culturally and politically since the Opium War, and the whole nation is exploring the reasons for China's weakness. On the one hand, I feel that foreign countries are very advanced, so there is a feeling that even tradition and morality are not as good as theirs; On the other hand, in the process of cultural collision, the party with a higher degree of civilization will have an advantage, which is reflected in the competition of national soft power, such as the output of Hollywood blockbusters in the United States, the output of Japanese cartoons, and the so-called Confucian culture in China. Of course, a country's transformation and development model will be dominated by political parties with a high degree of civilization at the beginning, and there is even a tendency to replace it. However, in the process of transformation, people pay more and more attention to their own cultural traditions as the driving force of a country's economic and cultural development. But in my opinion, culture will be integrated, that is to say, the result of the collision between tradition and civilization is mutual integration, forming a new feature of a person's country or nation and a new "tradition" supplement: learning traditional culture and mastering its essence. Carry forward and practice traditional culture with your own practical actions, and widely spread traditional culture with examples in life. Supplement: We should study hard the essence of traditional culture, but we should also create and improve it ourselves. We can't just accept it, because society is progressing, and we always have to abandon something that will hinder social development. The same is true of traditional culture, in a word: absorb the essence and discard its dross. Supplement: How to treat traditional culture?

China is an ancient civilization with a history of 5,000 years, and our ancestors left us a rich cultural heritage. How to treat traditional culture correctly is an important issue.

There are two wrong attitudes towards traditional culture, which are not desirable. First, take a nihilistic or cancelation attitude, totally deny China's traditional culture, classify it as "feudalism, superstition, backwardness" and even "reaction", and even blame it on the poverty and weakness in modern China and the current difficulties in China. The second is to affirm it indiscriminately, and people are not allowed to have any doubts and criticisms about it. Otherwise, it is to belittle China culture and forget our ancestors and worship foreign countries. These two seemingly diametrically opposed attitudes have the same consequences, that is, they have destroyed our traditional culture, affected our development pace and led us to the wrong path. Under the current national conditions, the latter attitude is more harmful and deserves our attention. Because the former attitude appears in the form of naked denial of history and forgetting ancestors, it is easy to be seen through, and it is naturally opposed by people when it comes out. The latter attitude is under the guise of patriotism, love for ancestors and promotion of traditional culture, and it is not easy for people to identify its absurdity and harmfulness. In fact, the vast majority of people who sell this view are not patriotic and love tradition, but have ulterior motives. This requires special vigilance.

From the perspective of historical materialism, it is an indisputable objective fact that the history of human development and the process of people's understanding of things are a continuous development process, and the general trend is continuous progress. No matter how extensive and profound the traditional culture of China is, it is always a historical heritage, and it is impossible to reach its peak without being surpassed. It is at this point that people who tout the supremacy of traditional culture have made fundamental mistakes. They believe that the classic theories, principles and formulations in China's traditional culture cannot be changed; All inventions and discoveries of later generations were predicted and guided by the traditional culture of China. They promoted the wisdom and achievements of the ancients to a bizarre height, and regarded the classic documents or legends such as The Book of Changes, River Map and Luoshu as supreme classics. Another example is unearthed ancient pottery, porcelain and textiles. Judging from the production level at that time, we really admire their exquisiteness, but we can't say that they are "peerless". Today's people are developing nano-scale products. How can ancient products be called "peerless"? Even nano-products are not "peerless".

From the viewpoint of dialectical materialism, everything always has limitations, deficiencies and uncertainties, not to mention the cultural heritage hundreds of thousands of years ago. While affirming the profoundness of ancient traditional culture, we have to admit that there are many feudal, superstitious and wrong contents in it, which is not surprising, taboo or harmful to the greatness of traditional culture. On the contrary, it is not a scientific attitude to deny these shortcomings. The traditional culture was sealed up, raised infinitely, refused to criticize and discard the useless, absorbed modern scientific and technological achievements to improve, and finally destroyed the traditional culture.

In a word, we should treat the traditional cultural heritage of the motherland. First of all, we should affirm its long history, profoundness and contribution to the development of China and the world civilization. This is our glory and pride, and it is by no means our burden. The second is to conduct scientific analysis and research, dare to analyze the dross, and expose and criticize without mercy. On this basis, we should absorb everything that is beneficial to the development of modern science and technology, so that it can regain its glory and climb new heights. This is the correct way to truly love the traditional cultural heritage of the motherland.

National registered architects and builders exam preparation materials; Over the years, the real test experience simulated test questions.

Since the establishment of Shenzhen Special Economic Zone, the discussion about whether there is culture in Shenzhen has never stopped. Some people say that Shenzhen is a "cultural desert". Some people say that Shenzhen has a culture, while others say it is an innovative "immigrant culture". Generally speaking, any society has its own way of life. As long as there are human activities, there is culture. Moreover, Shenzhen has gathered elites from all over the country, so it is hard to say that Shenzhen is a "cultural desert". Of course, the current cultural situation in Shenzhen will not be as praised by a cultural celebrity in China, that is, "Shenzhen is the bridgehead of China culture", "Shenzhen is qualified to sum up cultural affairs in the 20th century" and "strive for the settlement right in all fields of China culture in the 20th century"? This view not only makes China intellectuals dumbfounded, but even Shenzhen people can't believe their ears-has our cultural construction also set a new "Shenzhen speed"?

The poverty and weakness of Shenzhen culture is the knowledge inside and outside Shenzhen. Before the formation of immigrant culture, Shenzhen showed a commercial culture based on utilitarianism, but lacked mass citizen culture and elite academic culture. Unique dialects, snacks, customs and other civic cultures are absent in Shenzhen, which is also the main reason why people think that Shenzhen has no culture and no sense of identity. As for academic culture, Shenzhen occasionally has wonderful works in literature, art, social science and natural science, but they have not had a great impact on the whole city and formed a climate. So Shenzhen can't compare with Beijing, Shanghai and other cities, or even Qingdao, Wuhan, Xi, Nanjing and other large and medium-sized cities.

However, I am afraid it is difficult to stand on the ground that the short history of the city is the reason for the poor culture in Shenzhen. Throughout ancient and modern times, China and foreign countries, after the industrial and commercial development of a region, its culture also prospered. I remember a president in the United States said that our fathers fought bloody battles for independence in order to give us a stable opportunity to engage in production and construction, while we tried to give our descendants more time to engage in artistic activities. I don't remember clearly. In the 1980s, Shenzhen's economy was very developed. In the 1990s, the economy continued to grow at a high speed, but the cultural backwardness was not improved. This phenomenon is worth pondering by Shenzhen people.

In my opinion, apart from its short history, the cultural difference in Shenzhen should also be closely related to the following factors: First, the developed commercial culture in Shenzhen makes the city too utilitarian, and activities from the government to the people have a strong utilitarian purpose. Second, Shenzhen people are under great pressure to survive, and their energy and time to participate in cultural activities are very limited. Third, there are not enough mass cultural places in Shenzhen. Finally, Shenzhen's long-term neglect of the cultivation of cultural atmosphere has led to the unsustainable development of cultural undertakings in Shenzhen, although there are bright spots.

In the future urban competition, winning or losing depends on cultural theory. With the accumulation and support of culture, the city will be dynamic, dynamic and competitive. Cultural competitiveness is an indispensable part of urban comprehensive competitiveness. Especially in the era of knowledge economy, knowledge, information and knowledge workers have become the basic elements of productivity, and these elements need strong cultural tension to form a highly humanized economic system.

For Shenzhen, where most people have no sense of belonging and lack of urban cohesion, cultural identity is too important. Recently, Shenzhen put forward the development strategy of "building a city with culture", which shows that Shenzhen officials attach great importance to the poor and disadvantaged culture in Shenzhen. From June 5438 to 10, 2003, Mayor Yu Youjun emphasized that the world has entered the era of knowledge economy and information, and an obvious development trend is that the integration of culture and economy is getting closer and closer, and the position and role of culture in economic and social development is becoming more and more prominent. If Shenzhen is to become a big city and a strong city in economy, science and technology, it must also be a big city and a strong city in culture. This is a complementary relationship. Therefore, we should conscientiously implement the development strategy of "establishing the city by culture", focus on cultivating new regional culture with distinctive Shenzhen characteristics, and constantly improve the connotation, taste and competitiveness of Shenzhen culture.

A fact of imperialist aggression in China, although Dr. Hu Shi used to regard it as an overseas anecdote, is now.

No one can deny it. Regarding the way of aggression, Europe and America are greedy for money and advocate turning China into an economic colony; The Oriental faction is more greedy for land, so they advocate turning China into a political colony. As for the faction that propagandizes imperialist culture (that is, western culture) in China, it further advocates turning China into a cultural colony than the first two factions. His slogan is total westernization.

The former faction takes our market, the middle faction takes our land and the latter faction takes our spirit. To take away our spirit, to paraphrase an old saying, is to take away our hearts. Comparing the gains and losses of these three schools, the latter school is the most intense. Because after the imperialist culture dominates our consciousness, we will be in a state where people's hearts are dead and can never turn over. Hu Shi did not understand the abstract term imperialism, but defended it from both subjective and objective aspects, which is why his consciousness is imperialism. Therefore, the theory of total westernization is a theory of capitulation imperialism in the ideological field and a theory of cultural colonization. The initiator of this theory is Hu Shi, an international scholar trained by the material and spiritual pillars of international imperialism in Europe and America. This can only be understood by reading his article "Our Attitude towards Modern Western Civilization". Today, Chen and Liang Shiqiu have followed suit. They further advocated obliterating China itself, saying that China would only imitate imperialist culture. Liang Shiqiu said more clearly that we can't create, and it is exaggeration to advocate creation (Ta Kung Pao, June 9 this year). This is tantamount to saying that China people only deserve to be foreign slaves and comprador of imperialist culture.

So, is there something wrong with our introduction? This is progressive in the past and has the value of Renaissance. Now after "1927", it is a conservative thing. Fundamentally speaking, the past has the value of creation, and it is regarded as a means; Now, they are willing to introduce and oppose creation.

This introduction has no significance of cultural enlightenment, but an idea of cultural colonization. The basic knowledge of China people should not be created independently and freely, but only belongs to the West.

But can China create culture? Of course. France in the eighteenth century was behind Britain at that time. They introduced Locke, but created Biloch's thorough epistemology; Introduce Newton, but create a more perfect world view than Newton. 18, 19 century Germany lagged behind Britain and France, but great philosophers such as Kant, Fichte, Schelinger and Hegel and great thinkers such as Marx and Engels appeared. Russia in the twentieth century fell behind Britain, France and Germany. However, today, since 19 17, it has become the pioneer of the new world culture-socialist culture. The contribution of backward countries to culture has become a law.

Why? There is only one reason, that is, starting from the cutting-edge of historical development. To be clear, it is to proceed from the development direction implied by advanced countries. If it is known to all, it is "rushing". ""For example, if advanced countries have changed from water to steam and electricity, then you have been moving forward from electricity. This can be creative. If you start with water, it is called following, and you can only imitate it forever, but you can't create it.

In this way, if you want to be creative in culture, you must start with socialism. Because it is in the ascendant in western culture, people are in urgent need of creativity. This is why Russia is ahead of the world cultural history. If our introduction starts from capitalism and is only satisfied with capitalism, there will be no creation at all. Because capitalism has been in the west for 300 years, from germination to aging, there is no room for creation. The introduction of this culture is obviously a downward trend.

What Hu Shi, Chen and Liang Shiqiu introduced is called western culture on the surface, but it is actually capitalist culture-imperialist culture. They follow, they just follow in the footsteps of others all their lives. Of course, they are not creative. Therefore, Hu Shi openly advocated imitation, saying that imitation is creation. Chen's total westernization is total imitation. Liang Shiqiu denounced creation as an exaggeration.

Such imitation is the surrender of culture. Chinese nation, pour it into the cup of imperialism. If it wants to turn you into an economic colony and a political colony, then you should further become a cultural colony!

We are against imperialism, otherwise. We demand economic independence and freedom, political independence and freedom, and even more cultural independence and freedom. If the first two requirements are a kind of practical behavior, and the latter is a kind of conscious activity, and human behavior must go through consciousness, then the requirement of cultural independence and freedom is the beginning of lifting economic oppression and political oppression. It represents the awakening of the Chinese nation.

After the oppression in the 1980s and 1990s, especially after the "September 18th", "December 28th" and "Hebei Issue", advocating cultural independence and freedom is the spiritual struggle of intellectuals. No, this is a new beginning for the Chinese nation to be unwilling to yield under the new oppression and demand complete independence and freedom.

Down with the foreign slave comprador in the cultural world!

Create a new culture from the tip of historical development! Follow-up: simple! The most important thing is why we should adopt this attitude: what attitude should we adopt-

Absorb the essence and discard its dross.

Why do you want to hold this attitude-

Because everything always has limitations, deficiencies and uncertain factors, not to mention the cultural heritage hundreds of thousands of years ago. While affirming the profoundness of ancient traditional culture, we have to admit that there are many feudal, superstitious and wrong contents in it, which is not surprising, taboo or harmful to the greatness of traditional culture. On the contrary, it is not a scientific attitude to deny these shortcomings. The traditional culture was sealed up, raised infinitely, refused to criticize and discard the useless, absorbed modern scientific and technological achievements to improve, and finally destroyed the traditional culture. "