Evaluate the answer
You've already commented! Good: 0 You have already evaluated it! General: 0 You have already rated it! Bad: 1 You have already evaluated it! Original: 0 You have already evaluated it! Non-original: 0 Scorpio answer adoption rate: 32.9% 2010-02-0410: 37 I have better answers to collect and reprint in QQ space.
Related content
What is China's foreign policy? Three Answers to China's Foreign Policy? Two Answers to China's Foreign Policy? China's Foreign Policy: 1 Answer? What is China's latest foreign policy? American policy toward Japan after World War II American World War II movies American World War II movies China version American World War II movies war movies American World War II movies China version American World War II movies American World War II movies.
Other answers
After World War II, the goal of American global strategy is to seek "world leadership" and "shape the world according to American ideas". Socialist countries such as the Soviet Union and China are regarded as the main factors that hinder the United States from achieving these two goals. Therefore, the post-war foreign strategy of the United States mainly revolves around opposing * * * and seeking hegemony. However, subject to the changes in the international situation and the rise and fall of its own strength, the global strategy of the United States has shown different characteristics in different periods:
(1) Truman administration's "containment" strategy (1945- 1953)
Containment strategy is a major change of American foreign strategy after the war, which marks the qualitative change and leap of American strategy, shows that the United States and the Soviet Union moved from wartime cooperation to post-war opposition and confrontation, and laid the foundation for the United States' strategy of dominating the world for decades after the war. In order to fully implement the "containment strategy", the United States launched the "Marshall Plan", established NATO, and formed a strategic encirclement of China in East Asia and Southeast Asia.
② Eisenhower Doctrine of Eisenhower Administration (1953- 196 1)
Militarily, the Eisenhower administration put forward a "large-scale revenge strategy" to deal with socialist countries.
(3) The "peace strategy" of Kennedy and Johnson administrations (196 1- 1969).
The essence of the "peace strategy" of "holding an arrow in one hand and an olive branch in the other" is to use the counter-revolutionary strategy of peace and war to carry out peaceful evolution in socialist countries and promote neocolonialism in Asia, Africa and Latin America. In military strategy, the "flexible response strategy" is implemented.
(4) Nixon and Ford's Nixon Doctrine (1969- 1977).
The so-called "Nixon Doctrine" refers to a set of diplomatic thoughts and foreign strategies put forward in order to safeguard the hegemonic position of the United States when the strength and position of the United States have been seriously weakened and the international strategic position has declined. Nixon doctrine has three pillars: partnership, power status and negotiation.
The contents of Nixon Doctrine are as follows: ① Taking the establishment of "partnership" among allies as the cornerstone of American foreign policy, it requires allies to coordinate policies and jointly deal with the Soviet Union; Give in to each other economically to help the United States tide over the difficulties; Militarily, * * * shares the responsibility of military expenditure and national defense. (2) With strength as the backing and negotiation as the means, the Soviet Union is restricted through negotiation to maintain the balance of power between the United States and the Soviet Union. ③ Use China to restrict the Soviet Union and actively open the door to relations with China. (4) Shorten the front and strengthen the focus of the Third World.
The essence of Nixon doctrine is the product and expression of the decline of American hegemony. It was put forward under the unfavorable situation that the United States is on the strategic defensive, and its purpose is to continue to safeguard the global hegemony of the United States.
5. Carter's "World Order Strategy" (1977- 198 1).
The Carter administration continued Nixon doctrine in the early days and put forward the "world order strategy" after taking office. Its main contents include: ① Strengthening trilateral cooperation among Japan, the United States and Europe. ② Take the US-China relationship as the "central link" of US global policy, promote the normalization of relations, and seek to establish a strategic cooperative relationship against the Soviet Union. (3) Taking easing the relationship between the East and the West as the "primary goal", and emphasizing economic and moral strength to deal with the expansion of the Soviet Union. ④ Attach importance to human rights diplomacy.
[6] The Reagan administration's diplomatic strategy of "seeking peace through strength" ("Reaganism") (198 1- 1989)
Facing the domestic and foreign troubles of the United States, Reagan put forward the slogan of "reviving national prestige" and "expanding the army to resist the Soviet Union". Formulate the "Star Wars Plan", seek the strategic advantage over the Soviet Union, and bring it down economically. Militarily, he put forward a "new flexible response strategy", pursued a tough policy toward the Soviet Union and conducted an arms race with the Soviet Union. In addition, efforts should be made to restore the leadership over the West in order to realize the general strategy of anti-Soviet. All these show that the global strategy of the United States has crossed the scope of simply containing the Soviet Union after the war and entered a new stage of active attack and flexible counterattack.
(7) The Bush Administration's Global Strategy (1989- 1993)
During this period, great changes have taken place in the global strategy of the United States: firstly, the strategy of transcending containment was put forward, with the intention of bringing the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe into the western system. Second, it is proposed to establish a new European pattern, the essence of which is to ensure the interests in Europe. Third, the concept of "new world order" is essentially to transform the world according to American values under the leadership of the United States.
(8) Clinton administration's strategy of "participation and expansion" (1993-200 1)
This war is slightly "one goal" and "three pillars". "One goal" is to consolidate and expand America's "leading position" in the world, that is, America's world hegemony. Therefore, it is necessary to guard against potential strategic rivals and new superpowers, and focus on curbing those countries that have the potential to become global powers, such as China and Russia. The so-called "three pillars" refer to economic security, military strength, democracy and human rights. Its contents are as follows: ① Put economic issues at the center of foreign policy. Highlight the ideological factors in American diplomacy, vigorously promote American values such as "freedom", "democracy" and "human rights" in diplomacy, and strive to establish a world dominated by capitalism headed by the United States. (3) Maintain a strong military force to meet new security challenges.
A. in the first semester
199365438+1October 13, Secretary of State Christopher pointed out at the nomination hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that after the Cold War, the United States "needs to design new strategies" to protect its interests: first, it must promote its economic security; second, it must maintain a strong national defense force; third, it must encourage the ongoing global democratic revolution. 65438+ 10 18, Clinton once again stressed that the world has undergone fundamental changes, and American foreign policy must adapt to this change in order to achieve its goals, and once again stressed that American foreign policy will be based on the above three pillars.
1In July, 1994, the Clinton administration published its first national security strategy report after taking office, and put forward the strategy of participation and expansion, which marked the final determination of the theoretical framework of American global strategy after the cold war and the basic completion of the transformation of American global strategy from "cold war type" to "post-cold war type". The "participation expansion strategy" can be summarized as: taking advantage of the international situation that is generally beneficial to the United States after the Cold War, strengthening its involvement and participation in international and regional affairs, "expanding the boundaries of the free world" and realizing the "world leadership position" of the United States.
During the first term, although the Clinton administration put forward the strategy of participation and expansion, its foreign policy was still widely criticized at home and abroad.
B. Second semester
The United States began to evaluate the recent international environment and the trend of world powers, and focused on the competition of great powers in the 2 1 century, formulated the global strategy of the United States in the 2 1 century, and clearly pointed out for the first time that Russia and China may become global competitors of the United States in 20 15 years, indicating that the United States is worried about the long-term prospect of maintaining its status as an independent superpower. It is pointed out for the first time that the United States faces direct challenges of serious "asymmetric threats", such as terrorism, nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, information warfare, environmental damage and so on.
During the Clinton administration, the trend of multipolarization accelerated, the relations between major powers were deeply adjusted, and the outline of the international strategic pattern began to appear. The global strategy of the United States has gradually completed the transformation from "cold war type" to "post-cold war type" and established the basic framework of global strategy facing the new century. This transformation basically started with 1993' s "expansion strategy" and 1994' s "participation expansion strategy" and ended with 1997' s new strategic concept of "shaping-reacting-preparing". The global strategy of the United States facing the new century has become the greatest diplomatic legacy left by the Clinton administration to the Bush administration.
⑼ Bush Administration's Unilateralism Policy and Preemptive Strategy (200 1 1 Up to now).
After George W. Bush took office, his foreign policy mainly includes the following aspects: ① pursuing unilateralism policy and seeking to establish the hegemonic position of the United States. (2) Emphasize military priority and pay attention to cultivating American military strength. ③ Pay attention to American security. ④ Taking the fight against international terrorism as the central task of the Bush administration's foreign policy. ⑤ The global strategy of the United States has further shifted to the Asia-Pacific region. ⑥ In March 2003, the United States launched a war against Iraq without the consent of the United Nations, aiming at controlling oil in the Middle East, promoting American democracy in the Middle East, shaping a new pattern in the Middle East and influencing international politics. ⑦ Propose a preemptive strategy to crack down on "rogue states" and terrorists.
It is not difficult to see from the changes in the above period that "hegemonism" that dominates the world is a main line in the policy, and the core is the national interests of the United States. With the development of history, the United States has gradually approached its hegemonic intentions. At present, the rise of China and Russia, the development of Japan and Western Europe, and the revitalization of developing countries are still insurmountable obstacles for the United States to dominate the world. In order to break through obstacles, the United States uses its military superiority to control global strategic locations; Woo some capitalist forces; Attract interested developing countries; Measures such as suppressing its potential opponents.