When eating meat, did you do it to the extreme? In 30 years, you wrote a sword, sea, sky and autumn.
Fortunately, the article didn't meet Huang Zu, so I was embarrassed by Ma Zhou today.
Naturally, it is difficult for you to use the world. Is it really that I am not suitable?
You know, when you were young, Yun Zhi was once world-class.
Because we are used to the flat and flat meter, we can see that "when you need to know less" is obviously out of date, which means it is an ancient Chinese sentence. However, looking at the exquisite and fluent dialogues such as "the best in the world" and "Ling Yunzhi when he was young" is definitely not an antique image.
In other words, this sentence is a modern imitation of ancient poetry, which we usually use. As a first-class Chinese university in China, we should not make this mistake.
Netizens may also think that these two sentences are good, and they are interested in the source, or they may be as confused as metrical lovers-it is obviously the stream of consciousness after the Tang and Song Dynasties, but it is not up to the law-if something goes wrong, there will be demons.
So a large number of netizens began to search. Thanks to the domestic search engine, everyone quickly found the source of these two poems. A Four-line Poem by Wu in Qing Dynasty;
You know, when you were young, Ling Yunzhi was once the number one in the world. I don't know how many years have passed, but I still have both fame and fortune.
Netizens exploded in an instant. After reading the last two sentences, "I don't know how many years have passed, but I still have no fame and fortune", I thoroughly turned over the lofty aspirations of the first two sentences, lamented inaction and ended up laughing at myself.
A large number of netizens believe that it is simply ignorance for Peking University to inspire students on the eve of the college entrance examination with this kind of poetry with declining spirit.
This is also the reason for the statement of "official ridicule"-Wu is laughing at himself, and Peking University, as a dream place for elite students in the future, actually used this self-deprecating poem. Although it is obviously unintentional, it is really hard to forgive.
However, the deletion of Weibo by Peking University was considered weak by many netizens, which proved that the netizen's attack was right, and the attack hit the key point, which made the official of Peking University feel ashamed and hit the face.
But let's calm down and think about the doubts about the meter mentioned above.
Wu was a scholar in the Qing Dynasty. As the second peak in the history of China's poetry, Qing poetry has made great achievements in metrical poetry.
It's not that classical poetry can't work, but the first sentence of this search map is "out of place", and the third and fourth sentences "Where is the time" and "Return to fame and fortune" are not only out of place, but also out of place. After the Tang dynasty, even the ancient style would not be so wrong.
What's more, the sentences are plain and vulgar, and there is no antique situation at all-the first two sentences of this work are feasible, while the last two sentences belong to limerick, and the momentum and composition are obviously inconsistent. The first two poems are correct in style, but irregular. The last two sentences are not only irregular, but also unconventional.
Moreover, marking the "seven-character poem" in disorder-this is a mistake that poets after the Song Dynasty basically won't make-so, as a person who knows the history of poetry and knows a little about the evolution of rhythm and style, this seven-character poem used by netizens as an attack weapon should be forged or mixed.
Note that it is not that the oil painting style of the last two sentences is not good, but this writing is also possible. It is a good work that can reflect the poet's feelings. The problem is that the poetic style of the whole work is not harmonious-the first two sentences are not oily enough.
Therefore, after careful textual research, we will find that Wu did write such a poem, but it is not the same thing at all. Not only has this sentence been changed and made illegal, but even the last two sentences have been continued-this is really a forgery.
"Thirty Elephants" Wu Qingyi has never eaten a tiger's head. For thirty years, he wrote a sword. Fortunately, the article didn't meet Huang Zu, so I was embarrassed by Ma Zhou today. Naturally, it is difficult for you to use the world. Is it really that I am not suitable? You know, Yun Zhi used to be world-class.
This is a seven-character poem, which begins with rhyme and balances the "eleven things" part of the cloud and water. Plain and straightforward narration, excellent antithesis, appropriate use of allusions, relatively modern language, not as difficult to understand as ancient prose-this is the characteristic of Qing poetry.
We only look at the changed original sentence "You should know that Yun Zhi was once the first-class in the world", and here "You should know that it is flush", which conforms to the principle of flush sentence.
"Youth" is when you are a teenager, but this word is similar to the "strong years" mentioned some time ago, and it is not used much.
At the same time, "Yun Zhi" was changed to "Ling", which means "take". This change is actually possible, especially in the light of Young Ling. Although it is written on a level tone, it is not a problem to be a sentence alone.
Therefore, the revised sentence is easier to be understood and recognized by more people, and some people continue to add two sentences and become pseudographs.
Moreover, these two sentences have also been recognized by the official micro of Peking University, so they were released-in fact, this is a change with the times, and the problem is not very big. At best, it proves that the official micro of Peking University is not rigorous enough, because it is harmless to shout it out as a slogan in just two sentences.
Once a poem is written and calls itself seven verses, it exposes ignorance.