The national film "Green Snake Robbery" was released heavily and quickly swept through most cinemas in the country. The release of "The Green Snake Robbery" is not only a matter of chasing the light animation and the national circle, but also a major event of the whole China film circle, because many cinemas have made a huge bet on "The Green Snake Robbery" and they have improved the film arrangement as much as possible. If the box office of "The Green Snake Robbery" can break out, China cinema and even the whole film industry will have new hope, and the huge film arrangement will not be in vain. If The Story of the Green Snake is not good at the box office, then nearly half of the seats in the cinema will go to Shui Piao. The following small series will analyze it in detail for everyone, as follows:

The proportion of seats is close to 50%. Is "The Green Snake Robbery" so horrible? The proportion of seats on the first day of the release of "The Green Snake Robbery" reached a horrible 49.7%. In other words, nearly half of the seats in China Cinema are used to watch Green Snake. At the same time, the proportion of "Green Snake Robbery" is as high as 4 1%. In other words, four of the ten cinemas are showing "Green Snake Robbery". On the first day of its release, the cinema poured resources into "Green Snake", and its motive was clear at a glance, that is, betting heavily to help "Green Snake" break out at the box office.

The Green Snake Robbery has been pushed to the forefront. Is it success or death? Last year, The Legend of Deification made a lot of publicity. On the first day of its release, its attendance rate was just over 40%, slightly lower than that of Green Snake. That is to say, the resources obtained by the Green Snake Robber are better than those obtained by The Legend of Deification, which made a desperate announcement. If The Legend of Deification is a pig standing on the tuyere, then The Green Snake Robbery is a snake floating on the tuyere. The greater the ability, the greater the responsibility. The cinema has provided such rich resources for the Green Snake robbery. The green snake robbery must be successful, otherwise it will trigger a landslide effect and reduce the self-confidence of the film market.

In the summer file, the Chinese film is too lame, and the "Green Snake Robbery" is quite heavy? A few years ago, there were always comments about The Rise of Guo Man, but this year's summer movie was unexpectedly calm, because several films released in Guo Man had their own problems, and the box office was over 100 million, which had nothing to do with The Rise. Now "The Green Snake Robbery" has become the only hope for summer movies. If the reputation and popularity of The Green Snake Robbery are good, the slogan of "the rise of the country" can continue to be shouted. If "The Great Green Snake Robbery" is as mediocre as other movies, the voice of "The Rise of the Country" may be low, so the invisible pressure of "The Great Green Snake Robbery" will be great.

Not only Guo Man's The Saver, but also China's film The Saver? "The Green Snake Robbery" not only shoulders the heavy responsibility of the glory of a powerful country, but also shoulders the heavy responsibility of boosting China's film market. Why are all major cinemas in China willing to reserve half seats for Green Snake? Because the economic benefits of other films are too general, the seats are empty. The movie market needs a "magic boy" explosion to boost morale, drive the audience into the cinema and improve the attendance rate of other movies. So "The Green Snake Robbery" was invisibly endowed with the role of "rescuer".

It's only the first day of the green snake broadcast, so we can't put too much responsibility on it. The cinema Stud gave half the resources to Green Snake, which was the decision of the cinema. As ordinary audience, we don't have to pay for the decision of the cinema. If you like to watch the green snake, we will support it. If you don't like it, watch something else. After all, the money earned by Green Snake can't be distributed to the audience. what do you think?