Let me analyze it for you. First of all, there is a huge difference between big money and small money in financial management. Small money accounts for a low proportion of household assets, so generally speaking, everyone's demand for small money management may only focus on income, because no matter how big the risk is, there is not much money, and if it loses, it will lose. Therefore, if you want to invest small money in financial management, you can buy funds, speculate in stocks or even coins, because the position is low and the risk is controllable.

But big money is completely different. It may be a place where families live. When investors choose the financial management target for this part of the money, the first concern is risk control, and they should get benefits on the premise of the safety of the principal. As far as I know, what the Financial Rubik's Cube has been doing for seven years is to provide family asset management services that give priority to risk control and realize the original intention of allowing ordinary investors to obtain professional investment and financial management services.

I remember Mark said before: No matter how much money, just talking about income is hooliganism. It is true that some people hold high-yield fund products, but because of great fluctuations, they only dare to put a small amount of money in, and most of the money is in more conservative places. In this way, the overall rate of return on household assets is not high. Therefore, if you want to improve the total return on household assets, you still need to invest a lot of money, but Baidu will understand.