Lieutenant Colonel David Ou Wenjun (19 17)? He is an English soldier and writer. 1938? He joined the army and was appointed as a member of the Queen's Royal Corps in 1996. He is the second in command of this regiment? What is the identity of a battalion in the desert of western Palestine from 1939? Year to 194 1? In July, he joined the Long Distance Desert Group (LRDG)? . He took part in many operations, including attacking SAS. (such as bloody sand? August/September? 1942? He was in LRDG during the air raid? Base Couvrat? At 1942? In 2000 10, I was injured and almost lost my arm. 1943 answer the future LRDG? In February, 2008, he carried out some patrol missions in the whole LRDG? Before the Eighth Army arrived in Maris, the operation had actually stopped? After the line. His book "Such a Teacher" is now included in Unit 24, Unit 5, Chinese Book of Beijing Normal University 12, Unit 7, Lesson 2. The text is: Teacher Huai Tesen teaches us sixth grade science. In the first class, he asked us, "Who knows an animal named Katie Wangpu?" The students looked at each other (qù), and even Billy, who won the prize in the biology competition, widened his eyes in surprise. "Oh, no one knows." Teacher Huai Tesen smiled. "It is a kind of Nocturnal Animals, which can't adapt to the changes in the ice age environment and disappeared." With that, he took out an animal skull from the lecture table and explained the characteristics of this animal to us. Say that finish, he handed the skull to the students in the front row, let everyone take turns to observe. We read books and took notes with great interest, and some students even drew pictures. I thought to myself, this time I met a learned teacher. The next day, Mr Huai Tesen tested what he said last time. I answered the paper with confidence and handed it to the teacher. However, when the test paper was handed out, I was shocked: every question I answered was marked with a big red cross! What about colleagues? I wrote it completely according to what the teacher said! There must be some mistake. I looked at my classmates around me. It seems that every student has failed. Billy is knocking on the table. What's going on here? "It's very simple," Huai Tesen explained with a sly gleam in her eyes. "I made up everything about Katie Wangpu, an animal that never existed. Everything in your notes is wrong. Of course, you can't score if you are wrong. " "Never? What about the skull you took that day? " Billy asked. "That skull," Huai Tesen smiled, "is just a horse's skull." "Then why do you want to talk seriously in class? Why do you have to take the exam? What kind of teacher is this? " Anger welled up in my heart, and I pressed my lips tightly to control myself from shouting. There was a murmur of discontent in the classroom. Teacher Huai Tesen waved a hand to calm everyone down: "Haven't you ever thought about it? Since it is extinct, how can I describe its night vision, coat color and many non-existent phenomena in such detail and give it a ridiculous name? You are not suspicious at all, which is why you failed. " Teacher Huai Tesen said that the scores on the test paper should be registered in the grade book, and he really did. He hopes we can learn something from it. In Huai Tesen's class, every class is an unusual exploration. For example, once he said that cars are living things, let's refute them. I spent two whole days writing a short paper explaining that cars are different from living things. After reading it, he said, "You barely passed, and finally know what is biology and what is not." Gradually, we learned that what was written in the book and what the teacher said were not always correct. In fact, no one is always right. We should always be vigilant, correct our mistakes with facts and scientific methods, and have the perseverance to uphold the truth. Students call this learning method "new skepticism". We brought "new skepticism" into all classes. We pay great attention to the lectures in every class. Sometimes when the teacher is talking, a classmate will clear his throat and say "Katie Wangpu", and then he will stand up, look into the teacher's eyes and tell the reason for his doubt. It's interesting to do so. Of course, many times, we suspect that we are wrong, but the teacher corrects our mistakes and deepens our understanding of things; Sometimes our doubts are right, which in turn urges teachers to correct their mistakes. Not everyone can realize the value of this. Once, I told a neighbor about Mr. Huai Tesen, and he was surprised: "That teacher shouldn't play tricks on you like this." I looked him in the eye and told him, "No, you are wrong."

Edit this scandal about David Irving.

David Irving, a British World War II historian, is famous for his works. But in recent years, this reputation has become more and more notorious. He publicly insisted that Hitler knew nothing about the systematic slaughter of 6 million Jews in Germany. Today, he has been arrested at the age of 72. The location is in Hitler's hometown-Austria. The Austrian Ministry of the Interior165438+1October 15 confirmed that Owen was arrested by the police in Styria, southern Austria, on June 65438+1October1.This was based on the fact that Owen was arrested in June/KLOC. According to Austrian law, denying the Holocaust is a crime, with a maximum sentence of 20 years. Austrian news agency (APA) quoted unconfirmed reports that Owen had been put into a prison in Graz. Owen is not unaware of the risks of his trip. He also took precautions in advance. The trip is only one day, and few people know it. As Austria is a signatory to the Schengen Agreement, Owen can enter Germany without any formalities. However, according to the statement on Owen's personal website, the Austrian police "stole or intercepted his email" and knew his itinerary in advance. Before secretly going to Austria, Owen visited an old friend, the German playwright Rolf Hochhuth (Rolf? Hochhut), these two people have the same temper and appreciate each other. In many of Hodge's plays, the allied bombing during World War II was regarded as a war crime, and Churchill was also written as a war criminal. Earlier this year, he also publicly praised Owen as a "respectable person" and insisted that he was not a Holocaust denier. British Holocaust Education Foundation (Holocaust? Education? Trust) On hearing this, he praised the Austrian government, saying that Britain had not enacted a law denying that the Holocaust was a crime, and the Austrians "did what our laws should have done but didn't do". Owen has written and translated nearly 30 works on the history of World War II. He wrote biographies for almost all senior Nazi officials such as Goering, Goebbels, keitel, Rommel and Hess. War), he openly questioned the holocaust. He insisted that Hitler knew nothing about the Holocaust and there was no evidence that the Nazis had implemented the "final settlement" plan, so he was accused of propagating anti-Semitic and racist ideas. He argued that he never denied that Jews were killed by Nazis, but questioned the number of Jews who died in concentration camps and the way they died. For example, the scale of the gas chamber is far from so large. Most of the Jews who died in Auschwitz were due to typhoid fever, not systematic gas chamber killings, and the number of Jews who died was far lower than that recognized by people today. Being imprisoned in Austria is not the first time Owen has been prosecuted. 1992, he was fined $6,000 by a German judge for publicly declaring that the gas chamber in Auschwitz was completely false. Even more sensational, he and Deborah lippstadt (Deborah? Lipstadt) six years. 1993, Li called Owen "one of the most dangerous spokesmen of Holocaust deniers" in his book. Owen immediately sued lippstadt and Penguin, a British publisher, claiming that the book had tarnished his reputation as a historian. In 2000, Judge Charles Grey (Charles? Gray) finally declared Lee's victory in court. The judge also criticized Owen to his face, saying that he "distorted and manipulated historical facts for a long time" and was really an "active holocaust denier", "anti-Semitic and racist". At the beginning of this year, lippstadt's History of Trial: My Litigation with David Irving (History? Trial? Mine? Yin Da? Court? With what? David? Irving), reviewing the trial details of this landmark six-year libel case. This newspaper introduced this book twice in May and September this year. In March this year, American C-SPAN TV had planned to produce a documentary about the case, which would include Owen's speech refuting lippstadt, but more than 200 historians around the world jointly called on TV stations to give up filming the film. Irving's film Looking for Historical Truth (The? Search? For what? That? The truth? Are you online? History) was nowhere to be shown, and then he chose to attend the Melbourne Underground Film Festival. Even so, it still triggered protests in Australia, forcing the organizers of the film festival to finally cancel the screening of the film. Many books written by David Irving have electronic versions, which can be downloaded for free by the public on the Internet. Compared with other writers and scholars who attach importance to protecting the copyright of their works, this is really a strange phenomenon, which also reflects the dilemma that Owen and others have been beaten out of the water by everyone in the world, and makes us realize that how historians view the history of the Holocaust is not only a difference in academic views, but also a moral issue. Holocaust deniers and so-called historical revisionists have little market in academic circles and even public opinion fields in Europe and America. However, it is very wrong and dangerous for a few Japanese people who have similar behaviors to openly tamper with history.

The editor of this paragraph was sentenced to three years after denying the Holocaust and pleading guilty-

David Irving, an American historian who publicly denied the Holocaust, appeared in court on the 20th. In court, Owen bowed his head and confessed that his remarks were ridiculous. But because it was too late to regret, Owen was sentenced to three years in prison. On the 20th, Owen, wearing a dark blue suit and handcuffed, was taken to court by riot police. According to Roger Boyce, a reporter for The Times, Owen walked into the court with a "proud expression" and a copy of Hitler's War in his hand. After the trial began, the presiding judge Peter Libert Roy put forward a series of cross-examinations and asked Owen to apologize for his remarks in recent years. Owen, who lost his arrogance, later pleaded guilty to the court and admitted that it was wrong to deny that Auschwitz had a gas chamber. "I made a mistake and said there was no gas chamber in Auschwitz. I confessed," Owen said. "Gas chambers do exist, and there is no doubt that millions of Jews were executed there. I feel sorry for those innocent victims. " 1989, Owen gave two speeches in Austria, denying the genocide of 6 million Jews by the Nazis. Subsequently, the Austrian authorities issued a wanted order to arrest Owen. According to the Austrian federal law, no one can publicly make statements to excuse, deny or defend the history of the Holocaust. Owen said he had confessed to the Nazi Holocaust. "My point of view has changed. History is constantly developing, because you can read more documents and learn more. I have learned a lot since 1989. " During the trial, Owen repeatedly asked for probation. However, an eight-member jury finally made a decision and sentenced Owen to three years in prison. Owen seemed surprised after the decision to change his mind. Before attending the trial, Owen also told reporters that he felt that it was "absurd" for his remarks made 17 years ago to be tried. An old man who claimed to be Owen's friend shouted in court, "Be strong, David, be strong." The bailiff then expelled the old man from the court. Owen's defense lawyer, Elma Keres Bach, was dissatisfied with the verdict and said that he would appeal. Keres Bach thought that the sentence was too harsh and was suspected of "setting an example for others". On the day of the trial, Keres Bach pointed out that considering many factors, Owen should "get the corresponding leniency". "He is British and doesn't live in Austria; He is 67 years old; He is actually not dangerous, especially for Austria. " On June/KOOC-0/65438+/KOOC-0/October/KOOC-0/KOOC-0/June, 2005, Owen was arrested when he entered Styria, southern Austria, and was later detained in a prison in Vienna. During his detention, Owen applied for bail of $24,000 and was released on bail. However, the court rejected the application, pointing out that Owen might take this opportunity to abscond. Two weeks after his arrest, Owen announced to the outside world through his lawyer that he had changed his mind and admitted that Nazi gas chambers did exist. When the reporter asked Owen if he really changed his mind, lawyer Keres Bach said, "Yes. He explained to me that he had found new evidence and new documents to prove that the Holocaust did happen. "

Editing this paragraph is famous.

Owen, 67, is an expert on the history of the Nazi Third Reich, but he has always made statements denying the Holocaust, which is notorious all over the world. During his detention, Owen received a lot of support. Keres Bach said last month that Owen received nearly 300 letters from supporters all over the world every week. In order to prevent Owen's supporters from performing Nazi ceremonies or shouting slogans in support of Hitler during the trial, the Austrian authorities also specially deployed police forces. Owen wrote nearly 30 books, including many statements questioning the Holocaust. Because of these remarks, Owen was involved in litigation in Europe, especially in Britain and Germany. 1992, a German court fined Owen $6,000 because he publicly declared that the Nazi gas chamber in Auschwitz concentration camp was just a "scam". In addition, Australia, Canada, Italy, South Africa, Germany and other countries have restricted Owen from settling in their territory. In 2005, New Zealand also banned Owen from entering the country. Commenting on those who deny history, we should refrain from denying historical facts. David Irving, an Englishman, is an example. He was dealt with by the judicial authorities on the 20th. In an Austrian court, Owen was sentenced to three years' imprisonment, although he admitted that he had made false statements and caused harm to the victims of the Nazi Holocaust. As an Englishman who studies history as a profession, Owen not only "questioned" the fact that Jews were victimized in his works, but also gave a speech 17 years ago, arguing that the Nazi gas chamber in Germany was a "scam". Because of these words and deeds, Owen became a "street mouse" on the European continent. The Austrian judicial authorities not only issued a wanted order and put him in prison, but also the German court fined him. He is also unpopular in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Canada. Denying the crimes against humanity committed by Nazi Germany and other axis countries during the Second World War, even in the name of academic research, is at least a crime, even a crime. Punishing this crime is not only related to strict justice, but also to political correctness. It is intended to prevent the historical disaster of mankind from repeating itself, let the souls of the victims get peace, and let the scars of future generations be calmed down. The effect of justice means punishment for criminals like Owen, but it means warning to Owen's supporters that denying historical facts should be punished. In an Austrian court, a man tried to support Owen, but was expelled. On the international stage, there are always people who try to deny that the crimes committed by the authorities of the injuring country against the people of the injured country in World War II should also be expelled.