/KOOC-0/93/KOOC-0/September/8, 2008/KOOC-0/8, under the arrangement of the Japanese Kwantung Army, the railway "guard" blew up the Nanman railway track near Shenyang Liutiao Lake (built by China and later occupied by Japan) and planted the Japanese army. The Japanese army used this as an excuse to shell Shenyang Beidaying on the grounds of "September 18th Incident". The next day, the Japanese army invaded Shenyang. Because Zhang Xueliang insisted on the "non-resistance policy" repeatedly, in less than half a year, 6,543,800 square kilometers of land in three northeastern provinces were occupied by the Japanese army.
Extended data
The policy of non-resistance during the September 18th Incident became an indelible mark on the historical shame column. However, for decades, there have been many disputes about the origin, background and specific responsibility of "non-resistance".
In fact, the academic circles have long discussed: "In July and August before the September 18th Incident, Zhang Xueliang and Chiang Kai-shek had already reached the basic consensus of' non-resistance'. When the incident occurred, it was meaningless to ask for instructions, because the big response policy had already been determined."
To make a concrete study of the problem of "non-resistance", only starting from historical data can we hope to get a conclusion that conforms to historical facts-
The exclusive "early warning" before the "September 18th Incident" mentioned above was 193 19, the Central Daily. The newspaper of the day not only had the Japanese "revenge", but also had specific agreements; The sooner the military action is fully prepared, the better, and it is quite explosive. At the same time, it also published a report entitled "The Japanese Army Run amuck in Northeast China".
This report comes straight to the point and writes the following sentence: "The Japanese are ambitious and intend to invade by force." The article specifically recorded three things. One is that Japanese newspapers reported that "the General Staff Department recently issued an order". On the pretext of "there are many bandits in Northeast China recently", the Japanese General Staff Headquarters ordered "Manchuria Railway Guard to take a considerable defensive action". The Central Daily pointed out the essence of this matter: "The Japanese used bandits as an excuse to send troops across our territory and regarded China's rights as nothing."
The other two incidents were two incidents in which the Japanese army attacked China's military and police in the northeast of China, which occurred on September 13 and 15 respectively:
On the morning of this month 13, a group of 40 garrison soldiers entered Fushun for a drill. Our patrol police and the security team stationed in Fushun saw Japanese soldiers drilling in our territory and immediately warned them to leave. Japanese soldiers tore up our warning, suddenly surrounded our military police and threatened them with machine guns. There are only four people patrolling the police station and thirteen people patrolling the security team. They were outnumbered and unprepared, and suddenly they were surrounded by 40 Japanese troops armed with live ammunition.
Sadly, this time the Japanese attack on China patrol security team in Fushun was almost the same as the Japanese attack in many places during the September 18th Incident. China "does not resist" and "completely disarms" the Japanese army.
Reference link: People's Daily Online-Before the September 18th Incident, Chiang Kai-shek and Zhang Xueliang had reached an understanding of "non-resistance".