It is true that it is natural and understandable that each of us, as long as we are students who study hard and concentrate on our studies, want to make more money while satisfying our own interests and changing the fate of our families.
But the problem is that the money we earn in work and business is often out of proportion to our efforts in study.
It is possible that the "spiritual guy" who traveled all over the country after graduating from junior high school has now made a fortune and started a company. Those masters and doctors who kept saying that Tsinghua Peking University had become his employees. No matter how great your skills and creativity are, you will eventually nod to this manager with low education. Did you say you were wronged?
I can't help it Money is uncle!
1, people with low education have long working hours and rich social experience.
This is obvious. For those who have been screened out and eliminated from the senior high school entrance examination, they should stay in society for ten years longer than those who studied hard and enjoyed the spring breeze in their youth.
How many decades does life last?
Maybe you were ignorant ten years ago, but ten years later, you will be smart and wise. Even if it is the "10,000-hour law" in the eyes of ordinary people, that is, a person concentrates on a hobby, a skill or an industry for more than 10000 hours, then he is an expert!
Therefore, people with low academic qualifications are well-informed and professional, although they study less and have poor grades!
In the treacherous and changeable workplace and business world, it is really reasonable to earn more money and even become their boss than those newcomers, industry experts with low academic qualifications and savvy investors who just graduated from school with empty theories and arrogance.
2, the starting point of low education is low, and the development of high education is fast!
Obviously, among various professional courses in colleges and universities, including liberal arts and science, business courses that teach people to make money are only a small part, and most of them are purely theoretical and impractical research-oriented majors. Then, it is extremely contradictory and absurd to want to make more money after graduating from a major that has not made money for 20 years.
It is true that every subject has its research value, practical value and output value. Perhaps knowledge and skills themselves do not make money, but once they are applied and promoted to specific production and sales, they will stimulate and create unprecedented economic benefits.
For example, when we study painting art, except for famous artists, our works are all extensions of hobbies, and we can't make money, or even if we make money, we can't solve the problem of food and clothing. However, if we express what we have learned all our lives and our company's products in a perfect, perfect and creative way, we will make posters, copywriting and packaging that impress consumers and linger. Then our knowledge and skills will produce more value and benefits than our major, and we can get more commission bonuses from bosses who earn a lot of money but don't know art.
3. The key is opportunity. As for "tiankeng major" such as "biochemical recycling materials", it is good to have a high degree, but only you know whether the knowledge and skills you have learned are too difficult or unreliable. Even if you are knowledgeable and rich in practice, can your position allow you to give full play to your intelligence, knowledge, skills and insight?
Therefore, highly educated talents do not have to have a solid foundation and advanced theories to make more money. The key is to look at opportunities, jobs and projects.
People with low academic qualifications have a low starting point and no constraints and pressures. It is the boss who does well, and the employees who do badly. But highly educated people are different. Naturally, if you have a professional counterpart, you can apply what you have learned. Running into a wall when looking for a job, staying at home, is a "gnawing old giant baby".
Therefore, it is not that people with high academic qualifications earn less than those with low academic qualifications, or that they are incompetent and worthless; As the saying goes, "A clever woman can't cook without rice." No matter how powerful people are, what career can they do and how much annual salary can they earn if they are all in street offices and neighborhood committees?
You put a well-educated horse on a plow to plow the fields. Do you still think that he does less work than a low-educated ox and has low economic benefits? Is this reasonable?