For example, first, the Communist Party of China (CPC) was established, and the fire of revolutionary life began to spread in China. Then, New China was established, the old system was overthrown, and the people turned over and became masters of their own affairs. Therefore, to say that "without the * * * production party, there would be no new China" means to establish it first and then break it.
Stand without breaking, stand without breaking, and stand without breaking.
Gai Lou, for example, must first deny the unreasonable scheme and constantly criticize and modify the draft scheme, so as to get the final design blueprint, which can be said to be unbreakable. In the construction, the old house must be demolished first, and the foundation must be cleaned up, so that the building can stand still and be unbreakable. Secondly, it is the evolution trend of nature and the development law of human history. The Big Bang cosmology tells us that today's vast universe and twinkling starry sky would not have been born without the initial rock rupture. The theory of evolution also tells us that without the constant denial and breakthrough of the old material form, there would be no controversy and there would be no human beings. The history of mankind is to constantly break the shackles, pursue freedom, break through darkness and look for light. I really don't know how to answer this question, but whether you search online or dig from your life, there are too many examples. I really don't know how to answer this question, but whether you search online or dig from your life, there are too many examples.
So, let's provide a classic debate for your reference, although you may have seen it.
Pro: Peking University cannot stand without breaking.
Objection: Nanjing University is neither established nor broken.
Professor: That's why the second job will cause so much disorder and confusion. I also want to ask other students, according to your point of view, under the situation of central bank reform, should we set up a new central bank first, and then change the old one? If there were two central banks in the financial sector, wouldn't it be chaos! (Applause)
Counterparty: I want to ask other students, if you say that it can't be established without breaking it, then your school will soon set up the "Speaker Association". How much will it cost? (Applause)
Professor: Do you think breaking is destruction? Then the other person's point of view is neither established nor established, and finally you destroy it! (Applause)
The other party: I finally understand what the other party means. Another classmate said that after everything was destroyed, new things appeared like bean sprouts (laughs). This is a myth! (Applause)
Founder: Another student just denied the Cultural Revolution, and another student's understanding of abnormality is still at the level of the Cultural Revolution! I think today's topic is really good, and it is necessary to improve the misunderstanding of the other students (applause)!
Counterparty: I want to ask the other classmate, you have been saying. I want to ask the other classmate, what kind of beer do you use? How to break it?
Zheng Fang: What did you use to break it? It depends on what you do. Break the mountain and road with a shovel, dissect the sparrow with a knife; Of course, the fog of love must be broken with true feelings (laughter and applause)!
Counterparty: Yes, the other debater picked up a shovel and a knife. Isn't this a booth? So the other classmate hasn't solved what to break it with. Excuse me, this kind of break is unfounded; Still have evidence?
Founder: I want to ask other students what they are doing and whether they are exploring new fields, so shovels and knives have become new things that other students will do (laughter and applause).
Counterparty: the other classmate said it well, and it takes innovation to break the old. Doesn't this prove the view that we can't stand up and break? Another classmate said that the old and the new can't coexist, so I don't understand. In the history of literature, words came into being, but poetry did not disappear!
Founder: So do you think poetry is an old thing that hinders the development of history and should be broken? (Applause)
Counterparty: I have to ask my classmates. Let's take a look at our reform. Now our reform has established economic construction as the center. Isn't this the first step?
Professor: Then let's see how the reform started! How can we carry out reform and opening up without breaking the "Left" policy and the "two whatevers"? Please answer. (Applause)
Opposing party: It is precisely because our country has established the ideological line of "seeking truth from facts" that it has broken the "two whatevers"! I would like to ask other students how to get rid of the traditional cadre management system if the national civil service system is not established.
Founder: Yes, it started with the establishment of "seeking truth from facts". Then why don't we set the goal of reform and opening up at 1976? (Applause)
Counterparty: Because we haven't come up with an idea like ours for 76 years. I want to ask other students that the bankruptcy law allows our enterprise to go bankrupt. Isn't that what it is?
Fang: Then why don't you set it? This is because we have not completely broken the rule of the Gang of Four! (Applause)
Counterparty: classmate, let's look at reality! Another classmate always said that the old and the new can't coexist, so please tell me, the profits of joint ventures and foreign-funded enterprises in China are increasing, and state-owned enterprises have not gone bankrupt one after another?
Founder: Is it necessary to bring down state-owned enterprises? As we said, before establishing foreign-funded enterprises, we must first break the policy of closing the country to the outside world. (Applause)
Anti-opponent: The other classmate is right, but you have to break the situation of behind closed doors. What will you use to break it?
Founder: I still want to ask other students to answer us again. 1976 we can't set the goal of reform and opening up.
Counterparty: The other classmate, it's not 76 years now. Let's talk about 1994. (Laughter) We can see that Fiona Fang can't do it without rules. Didn't Beijing make new rules and break the old habit of setting off firecrackers on New Year's Eve?
Professor: OK, let's go back to 1994. If we don't get rid of egalitarianism, how to establish a new social security system? I'm afraid it's another pot of rice!
Counterparty: The opponent's debater said it well. Isn't it because the men of Fengyang 18 in Anhui Province established the contract responsibility system of joint production that broke the cauldron? No standing, no breaking! (Applause)
Founder: But how can we establish this contract responsibility system? If they 18 men don't break the commune system of "one big man and two big men" and divide the fields, how can they establish that responsibility system? (Applause)
Opposing party: The other classmate obviously reversed the relationship between the beginning and the end. Of course, we invented color TV first. Does the other classmate mean to smash all the black and white before the color TV comes out? (Applause)
Agree: Other students' understanding of "Broken" still simply stays on the basis of "Broken". We are not satisfied with the unclear state of black and white TV, so we have the desire to invent color TV. Isn't this still unbreakable? (Applause)
Counterparty: Let's go back to the house from the color TV. (Laughter) Many old people in Beijing advocate building a new building before tearing it down.
Founder: But how can you build a high-rise building unless the hut knocks it down?
Counterparty: The other classmate means that the old house will be demolished first, and then the new house will be built, so the people will have to sleep on the road. (Applause)
Founder: Other students may not understand Beijing's policies yet! How can we all move into tens of millions of houses in Guangsha without changing the private rooms of enterprises in the past and establishing a housing social security system?
Counterparty: Yes, before building a house, if we don't have a blueprint, it's illegal construction!
Leon: You can build a building after you make the blueprint. Then I think you don't need bricks in Gai Lou. As soon as you draw a pencil, the building is completed. (Applause)
Counterparty: But if we don't draw a blueprint first, what shall we build a building on? I want to ask other students that Xu Honggang's brave spirit has set up a monument in each of us. What did this break?
Professor: But how did this blueprint come out? Let's see how many schemes were rejected by our engineers and technicians, and how many manuscript papers were torn and scratched before they came up with them!
Opposing party: the opposing party actually said that the old one would not go and the new one would not come. In fact, the new one should not come, and the old one should not go. Can you take off your old clothes before you get new ones? (Laughter and applause)
Pro: the other classmate's point of view is nothing more than saying that you can stand without breaking. Then look at the unbreakable examples in history. For example, the Westernization Movement. It didn't want to break the old system of Qing Dynasty, so it established a powerful China. But? Finally, the Beiyang Navy was established. What happened in the end? It was broken by the Japanese. (Applause)
Against: Talk about history, talk about history. If Copernicus did not establish "Heliocentrism" at first, how could he break the "geocentric theory"?
Agree: But if we don't break the autocracy and authority of the church, Copernicus will be burned to death like Bruno. (Applause)
Opposing party: If he didn't establish a new concept, how could he break the concept at that time? I want to ask other debaters, do you mean that if we want to reach a state of one second, we must first break all the mirrors? No wonder the divorce rate is so high now. (Laughter and applause)
Pro: What the other party said is nothing more than setting up an idea first. Then I want to ask, where does the correct concept of people come from? Did it fall from the sky? No, is it inherent in people's minds? Not exactly. It comes from the practice of breaking the old and establishing the new. (warm applause)
Counterparty: Yes, isn't practice and production practice for a better tomorrow? I want to ask other students, if it is broken, there is no need to stand! A while ago, the development zone was hot because there was no overall planning, and as a result, it broke ground. Finally, development, development and opening up have not been achieved!
Founder: Yes, if we don't make a major breakthrough in reform today, how can we build a better tomorrow?
Counterparty: The other classmate means breaking is practicing, so touching a bulldozer is the biggest practitioner? ! (Applause)
Professor: How can you break ground and build a building without the practice of bulldozers?
Counterparty: Then according to the other students' meaning, our construction team can only follow the bulldozer! (Applause) It is easier to shake the mountain than to shake the Yue family army.
Pro: If the other person wants to talk about history, let's start with the oldest one. If humans don't get rid of the bad habit of walking on four legs, how can we stand here today and argue with the other team? (Laughter and applause)
The opposing side: The opposing side argues that if everyone wants to walk standing, they have to kill all the monkeys! (Laughter and applause)
Founder: It seems that other students' understanding of abnormality is really not divorced from the "Cultural Revolution". I can give another example: the famous utopian socialist Irving hopes to build a socialist paradise without breaking the capitalist system. So he set up an experimental area in America, but finally he had to break it down. I think everyone knows that he is bankrupt himself! (Applause)
Counterparty: Why did it fail? I don't think it's because we haven't established the scientific ideology of productism, so we can only win again and again if we don't break it. (Applause)
Professor: But how did the idea of scientific productism come about? It is the criticism and negation of the old utopian socialist thought that led to the establishment of this thought! (Applause)
Opposing party: this is precisely the sublation of old ideas! Young is standing, abandoned is breaking, not standing is not breaking!
Professor: But what should we throw away? Sublation is the inheritance of criticism. Criticize first and then inherit. You can't stand without breaking it! (Laughter and applause)
Counterparty: The other classmate said it well. Is critical inheritance critical or inheritance, which is more important? (Applause)
Professor: But you have to criticize first. For example, a pile of fruit, you have to choose first, then eat! If you choose after eating, I'm afraid diarrhea will come. (Laughter and applause)
Counterparty: the debater means that the original concept was completely knocked down, and then a new concept was established on the ruins!
Founder: So you mean you don't care about anything, whether you like it or not. Then I have to remind each other to be careful. No marijuana, opium and concubines! (Laughter and applause)
Counterparty: Don't tell us the law of ocean tides in the swimming pool. I asked other students, if our country does not establish a civil service system, how can we get rid of the old cadre management system?
Fang: What is a truly magnificent sea? Please pay attention to the revolutionary history of mankind. How can the people of China stand up from now on if the three mountains are not overthrown?
Against: The reason why we can overthrow the three mountains is because our country has established the * * * production party and (Bell) established the people's army! (Applause)
Agree: But how can we establish a * * * production party and a * * * production ideology without breaking through the limitations of old ideas and experiencing the May 4th storm? (Bell)
President: Just now, when students from both sides were engaged in a fierce verbal battle, did you consider which side our audience friends were applauding for? I think our audience friends here should be said to be the fairest. Like me, in this debate, we really can't bear to part with which one has the "Changhong Cup". I sincerely hope that both students can stick to the end, and persistence is victory! All right, ladies and gentlemen, let's move on to the third stage of the finals: concluding remarks. Each team will speak for 4 minutes. Please welcome the students who are against it. Please.
Objection: Thank you, Chairman! Hello everyone! In the speech and free debate just now, other students always avoided our questions. First, what is the standard of breaking? What is the means? Second, can it be broken? What's the value of the broken one? Third, must it be broken if it is established? Can it stand without breaking? According to the logic of other students, I'm afraid your argument will be hard to hold water without breaking all the facts we have listed. Of course, today we are not sitting on the road, but discussing an era theme closely related to reform and opening up, economic development and even the rise and fall of the country.
In our opinion, if it is not established, it will not be broken. First, it will not stand or break; Explain that the station is the subject, the guarantee, the value, the destination, and the star that never falls in the vast starry sky. However, the argument that "broken" is not established has raised "broken" to the supreme position, putting the cart before the horse in theory and doing endless harm in practice. Second, the radical slogan of "breaking" can only bring fanaticism, chaos and destruction. Ten years of life and death, the people of China will never forget the historical tragedy condensed with blood and tears. Doubt everything, overthrow everything, deny everything, destroy everything, the storm-like catastrophe, leaving us only deep sighs and endless regrets. Third, the rational attitude of "standing" as the head, not standing and not breaking, has brought calmness, stability and creativity. The tragedy of history cannot be repeated. Today's China is a developing and innovative country. The brilliant achievements of reform and opening up have eloquently proved this truth: only by establishing the legal system and democracy can we truly get rid of the rule of man and arbitrariness; Only by establishing a market economy can we truly break the planned economy; Only by establishing a development strategy centered on economic construction can we really get rid of the political slogan with class struggle as the key link. Standing without breaking, standing without breaking, this is the basic principle of reform and opening up, and it is the strategic shift of * * * and China. Fourth, when people's mentality changes from "broken" to "established", from unbreakable or unbreakable, we will also bid farewell to the traditional destructive cultural psychology and move towards a positive and constructive cultural psychology; Say goodbye to narrowness and arbitrariness and move towards broadness and tolerance; Say goodbye to naivety and blindness, and move towards maturity and rationality. A brand-new national spirit was born in an unbreakable awakening. It will be as high as the sky and as vast as the ocean. The Chinese nation is a traumatized nation, and history has left us with the most tears, blood, groans and sufferings. It also leaves us with a mission and responsibility, leaving us with no choice but to resist. "Young people should take the cloud to heart." As a cross-century college student, when we deeply realize that there is less criticism and more tolerance; Less sarcasm, more understanding; When we criticize less and create more, we will really learn to be pioneers and creators of the times, not destroyers and destroyers; I also learned to leave flowers and laughter for mankind instead of ruins and disasters. In this way, when the years pass and there is not much youth (clock), we can proudly declare to the beautiful motherland that there is no regret in this life! Thank you (long and warm applause)
PRESIDENT: Thank you for your enthusiastic audience. It's time for the opposing side to speak. Please welcome positive students to make concluding remarks. Please.
Professor: Thank you, Chairman! Hello everyone! Other debaters are always asking us, where does breaking standards come from? Then, I want to tell each other once again that breaking the standard is forged from the practice of human beings transforming nature, transforming themselves and breaking the old and creating the new. Our party has demonstrated the invulnerability from three aspects: philosophical logic, social change and cultural development.
Next, I will further summarize the evolution of civilization and the modernization of China. First of all, only by not breaking and standing can we promote the evolution of scientific and technological civilization. The progress of science always begins with doubt. A history of science in the 20th century has repeatedly proved that human beings are approaching the truth in the process of constantly overcoming fallacies. When the wave of the third scientific and technological revolution beats the land of the ancient East, China's scientific and technological industry will advance by leaps and bounds. Only by constantly breaking through the shackles of the old etiquette and the restrictions of the old conditions can China leap to the forefront and occupy a leading position in the high-tech competition. Secondly, the evolution of the social system can only be promoted if it is not broken and not established. Whether it is Kang Youwei's deep sigh after the failure of the Reform Movement of 1898 or Sun Yat-sen's hesitation after the failure of the Revolution of 1911, history has told us more than once with bloody lessons that in today's reform and opening up and the establishment of a new system, only by criticizing and denying the old system can we truly establish a new system. Finally, neither breaking nor standing has promoted the evolution of human culture. From Marx's declaration of discovering the new world by criticizing the old world to Li Dazhao's cry of breaking the historical trap; From Lu Xun's "Breaking the Call Sign of Iron House" to today's China intellectuals' stepping out of the misunderstanding of modern superstition, we can see that truth is shining in the long river of human culture, whether in the evolution of scientific and technological civilization or system. Looking around the world today, human society is in the midst of great changes at the turn of the century. All countries are trying their best to seize the new commanding heights of human civilization in 2 1 century. And I, the Chinese nation, the descendants of the Chinese people, have also carried forward the past in the reform and opening up and realized the Millennium dream of this nation. In this exploration and transcendence of innovation and innovation, pain and hardship, bumps and setbacks are inevitable, and fear and hesitation will only make us miss the opportunity again. But we believe that when the rising sun of new civilization breaks through the horizon of the century, this ancient nation will eventually soar in the sky in the phoenix nirvana. If the ocean is destined to burst its banks, let all the bitter water be injected into my heart. If the land is destined to rise, let mankind choose the peak of survival again. New opportunities and shining stars will eventually fill the empty sky. That's a hieroglyph of 5,000 years, and that's the eyes that people will stare at in the future.