This is actually a relationship between efficiency and fairness, and of course it is also a relationship between simple labor and complex labor. Secondly, I don't agree with you. Some people don't have to do anything, but they don't do it. On the one hand, I will briefly talk about it. Emphasize that efficiency needs a certain distribution gap to stimulate; Emphasizing fairness means narrowing the distribution gap. Generally speaking, in the early stage of development, society attaches importance to development, and to a certain extent, it will attach importance to fairness-with a financial foundation, it will prevent the intensification of social contradictions. It seems that at the 15 conference, the slogan was "giving priority to efficiency and giving consideration to fairness". In the past two years, China has paid more attention to people's livelihood than in the past. Although 6666666675 is not enough, it cannot be compared with developed countries for a long time. It should be pointed out that it is not the first time to narrow the distribution gap. At the present stage and for a long time to come, the initial distribution gap will not narrow, but will widen. In other words, polarization will intensify. Emphasis on fairness is mainly secondary distribution. On the one hand, taxes will be strengthened, especially for enterprises and high-income people; On the other hand, to strengthen the protection of workers' rights and interests, strengthen social security and social welfare work (minimum living security, medical insurance ...) and live a good life, we must improve ourselves and participate in competition. For the current income gap in China, we should not only dialectically see the reasonable factors that lead to the widening of income gap and the incentive effect of a certain income gap, but also see the negative impact of excessive income gap on social stability and economic development. First of all, we should change our ideas and establish the concept that * * * is not equal to wealth. There is an income gap, which is a normal phenomenon in the process of economic development. If we simply equate * * * and prosperity with synchronous prosperity, it will lead to egalitarianism in distribution and have a negative impact on China's economic development. Secondly, the current income gap in China is based on the improvement of people's living standards, but some of them have improved rapidly and some have improved slowly. Thirdly, the current income gap in China has its policy factors. China implements the distribution system with distribution according to work as the main body and various modes of distribution coexisting, and adheres to the combination of distribution according to work and distribution according to production factors, and adheres to the principle of giving priority to efficiency and giving consideration to fairness. The higher income obtained by working harder and honestly or putting production factors such as capital technology into production is allowed by our party's policy of enriching the people. The resulting income gap is normal. Fourthly, it is the result of the adjustment of social and economic structure in China. The profits created by high-tech industries are much higher than those of traditional industries and sunset industries. Therefore, the income of mental workers, workers in technology-intensive fields and workers in capital-intensive industries has increased rapidly. This phenomenon exists not only in China, but also in developed countries. Fifth, the diversification of employment methods and income sources will inevitably increase the income gap. However, we can't ignore the negative impact of excessive income gap. First of all, excessive income gap may lead to social instability. Especially in China, there is a cultural concept of "not suffering from widowhood but suffering from inequality" in history. Therefore, once the income gap exceeds the psychological endurance of ordinary people, it will pose a great threat to the stability of China. Secondly, the problem of illegal high income will hinder the normal development of the economy and may lead to the breeding and spread of corruption. What is more noteworthy is that these illegal high-income earners may form a special interest group in order to protect themselves. These people are small in number, but they have great energy and even influence decision-making. Third, the widening income gap between industries caused by monopoly will not promote economic development, but will cause people's dissatisfaction and comparison, thus hindering the sustained, stable and rapid development of the national economy. The countermeasures to solve the widening gap are: first, protect legitimate income according to law. Getting rich first through honest labor and legal management, or participating in the distribution of production factors such as capital and technology, is the result of our party's policy of enriching the people and should be encouraged and protected. Secondly, illegal income should be banned. Those who embezzle public property, use illegal means such as tax evasion and trading power and money to seek benefits must be resolutely punished according to law. Third, rectify unreasonable income. Strengthen the supervision and management of income distribution in monopoly industries, and resolutely correct the extra income obtained by virtue of some special conditions of industry monopoly. Fourth, adjust excessive income. It is necessary to strengthen the adjustment function of the national tax policy on income distribution, improve the personal income tax law and levy new taxes such as inheritance tax.