From the philosophical point of view, it is argued that "man can conquer nature" should be changed to "man can conquer nature"

The premise of this topic seems to be that the latter is correct, so there is no need to use any point of view to prove it.

The former is actually an inspiring statement, more like a propaganda language such as a slogan, which has the characteristics of the times, for example, one is not afraid of suffering and the other is not afraid of death. How many people are not afraid of death? I was just shouting, or just shouting. If you shout this slogan again in today's peaceful world, I'm afraid it won't inspire anyone, only that you are out of your mind.

If a definite word is an extreme definition, is it natural for human beings to exhaust gas from refining oil? Imitate or win the day? How should philosophy be discussed?

It's probably current affairs.

Planning and release of night cultural tourism projects in Moxintang area.

Russell's evaluation of Locke, Montesquieu and Rousseau.

What do you mean by big three rooms?

Decibel activity of love

One thing I care about is writing my own opinions.

Born in Shaolin, I was lucky enough to be appreciated by Stephen Chow, and now I can only play a supporting role. Who is he?

Guo chengxian's personal data

Furong town: An Analysis of Qin Heroism

What positions are there in the Interpol Brigade?

Self-awareness is the key to learning.