A fourth-grade pupil told me that he memorized a mobile phone 1000 times a day, which showed that he had been in a daze and had been thinking about a mobile phone for the last six months. He doesn't know how many generations a mobile phone has been produced, let alone how good it is. There is no androgen in the fourth grade of primary school, and there is no need to choose a spouse or show off financial resources to the opposite sex. He is simply manipulated by his thinking, and modern marketing can control his thinking directly without relying on primitive instinct. Brand symbol is a tool to pretend to be a higher economic class through conspicuous consumption (the scum of capitalism). Adults can freely fall into the consumption trap. But the concept of "decency" is popular even in the capitalist world. For example, in school, there are many good rules: no fancy clothes, no revealing clothes. Rejecting conspicuous consumption is obviously an important aspect of good school spirit;
First, it is difficult for the descendants of socialist criminals who get rich first but fail to fulfill their responsibility of driving them to get rich later to get in touch with the school; Parents who are not well-off also exempt their children from meaningless conspicuous expenses. You know, before 1995, when people went to school, they had little financial resources. At that time, the school mainly compared the results. In retrospect, the environment was really clean. Before Edison Chen and those naive stars had an accident in 2008, most people had dreams about love, ideals, beliefs and ism. I have always believed that those good times may be gone forever.
Second, on a large scale, the vitality of a country needs class mobility. On a small scale, a person's correct consumption concept can also affect a person's achievements, especially the direction of scientific research. I don't participate in Nike's hype. Nike's water army will delete it when it sees it, and it will never be merciless. After Xinjiang cotton, sales plummeted. Congratulations! Many parents in third-and fourth-tier cities earn more than1000 * * 4,000 a month, and some have to raise two children. Is Nike expensive for them? Is Nike worthy of the struggling proletariat? Anyone with a conscience knows this. It also includes all brands such as Li Ning and Apple that started from hype. It is not worth the yearning of people who live hard. Banning schools is justice.
I think it is still worth buying when your monthly income is more than ten times the price. It's worth it That's when you spend money As for "who is worthy of this thing", this concept is a stupid consumption trap. The good proletariat has nothing to aspire to. It will only appear when the proletariat has spare money or really needs its performance. Judging from the announcement, I want to wear domestic or three nameless shoes, which reflects the patriotism of the school and the high standards and strict requirements for students. This is ridiculous. Even the most basic shoes of Nike and Adi for one or two hundred dollars are not allowed, so Li Ning will not mention it. If we really want to limit the number of shoes, we should point it out clearly, instead of writing down all the foreign brands we can think of.
In fact, among low-end shoes, Li Ning and Nike include Anta, which is famous for its cost performance. In fact, there is not much difference (Anta may be cheaper), so you wear Li Ning 150 and I wear Nike 180. These are very ordinary shoes. What is there to compare? As for who looks good, every flower has its own vision. When I was looking for it, I felt that Li Ning and Nike were so far apart on the white label on the black background that they could not tell each other at all. Schools should first do their own jobs and teach students' grades well.
What kind of clothes and shoes to wear depends on the students' family economic conditions, cultural background and industry cognition. This simple and rude practice is obviously not desirable. If the starting point is correct and no other interests are sought, it is understandable, but it must be discussed and voted by the family Committee. Later, I also saw the comparison of style of study, achievements and whether it is too utilitarian. The slogan is shouted like this, without considering the children who have lost confidence in their studies, and their hearts are very tormented. For students who are about to graduate, academic performance is very important, but it is not the most important. As long as you work hard, no problem. The essence of education is to educate people, not to excel.
It is rare for so many good schools and teachers to persist in socialist education and continue to work hard to cultivate real talents at the risk of being attacked by the internet. This normal thing, you are unlikely to discuss, with good intentions. I can guess other answers, too I believe that black schools are the mainstream. Maybe I am the only one who is still struggling, but I will never give up. I'm not targeting anyone. I'm just saying that most people in Zhihu have failed and need online dating. This article is written so clearly that many people use the stupid reason that "400 is not expensive" to show their superiority. Those poor children don't know you. Can you show me a performance? Let me circle "Don't let students wear designer shoes" for you. In other words, as long as there is no big logo, teachers can't see the brand. ? Yeezya doesn't have the analog devices logo. If 350 is too bad and easy to be found in the street, then 380,450,700,500 shoeless dog teachers will definitely not recognize it and can't map it. Those who are interested can search by themselves. In addition to ajl logo and aj3 1, Nike aj has several generations of fuzzy hooks without logo!