A: With the further deepening of imperialist political and economic aggression against China, the aggression of culture and education is also increasing. Church education has seriously violated China's educational sovereignty. In the mid-1920s, people in China increasingly realized the true face of the cultural aggression of missionary schools, and the movement to reclaim the right to education from the church was inevitable.

1922 In March, Cai Yuanpei published "On the Independence of Education" in New Education magazine, strongly advocating that education should be independent of political parties and religions, and took the lead in raising the banner of anti-Christian education. 1In September, 923, Yu Jiaju published the article "The Problem of Church Education" in the monthly magazine "Young China People", and took the lead in putting forward the slogan of "recovering the right to education", which quickly aroused the condemnation from all walks of life, especially the education sector and students. In April, 1924, the authorities of Guangzhou Sany School prevented patriotic students from taking action, which led many students to drop out of school to protest. This movement was generally responded by other missionary schools in Guangzhou, and the movement of Guangzhou students to recover their right to education quickly spread to the whole country. 1925, the movement to recover the right to education reached its climax in the May 30th Movement, and students from all over the country held massive demonstrations. Students in missionary schools dropped out of school one after another and devoted themselves to the struggle against missionary education with practical actions. 165438+1October16, the Ministry of Education of Beiyang Government promulgated the Measures for Examination and Approval of Donation by Outsiders to Establish Schools.

Although the right to education in missionary schools was not completely recovered because of the movement to recover the right to education, China people had a clearer understanding of missionary schools, which inhibited the development momentum of missionary education for a period of time and forced missionaries to reflect on their school education. The religious color is weaker than before, but the practical educational function has been strengthened. It can be said that the movement to recover the right to education is an indispensable prelude to the localization and secularization of church education (especially church universities) in the future, which has far-reaching historical significance.