First, before the Holocaust began, the attitude of the United Nations was influenced by the United States, a permanent member of the Security Council. The attitude of the Clinton administration is "Let's get out of here and let the idiots in Rwanda play by themselves." In addition, a United Nations commander was informed of the massacre in advance, but the report was fruitless.

During the Holocaust, the French army only evacuated local expatriates without direct intervention.

After the Holocaust, the French Parliament and the Rwandan government respectively investigated the behavior of the French government at that time and reached diametrically opposite conclusions.

The United States has a close relationship with RPF and provided military assistance to the organization after the invasion. However, before the massacre, the attitude of the United States was influenced by the battle of Mogadishu and adopted a laissez-faire stance. The specific performance is: 1, persuading the United Nations to withdraw its troops before April; 2. Refusing to interfere with the radio stations that propagate the slogan of the Holocaust; 3. I knew in advance that the leader who directed the massacre had a dialogue, but I didn't do the follow-up work; 4. The delay in formally condemning the Holocaust; 5, four winds is not straight, bureaucrats delayed the government's response.