Aside from the common faults of Jin Yong's novels caused by the serial development of popular literature and newspapers, for example, Jin Yong's creative level is top-notch, and the legendary swordsman is also his masterpiece. Personally, I think Jin Yong's novels are the best. Let's talk about writing first. In the legendary swordsman, Ling Huchong, the protagonist, has been in a state of injury and poisoning for a long time, which also produces an interesting feature of the novel, that is, the transition of fainting. In this transition, the plot will undergo tremendous changes, thus forming the combination of the old man and the new situation, leading to the balance being broken, and the protagonist's actions constantly promote the development of the plot until a new balance is reached.

Of course, in the legendary swordsman's postscript, the author makes it clear that this is a political novel, and its most striking feature lies in its metaphor. As for this version of Li He's TV series, the biggest problem is that the theme of the novel "the legendary swordsman" is not made into a movie. Although it is involved, it finally becomes a mockery of the battle for talents in the world, which is too superficial. Jin Yong's criticism is obviously not the pursuit of the best martial arts in the world. On the contrary, from this perspective, Dong Fangbubai is a pure warrior, and this slogan is obviously heard more by Yang Lianting. In the movie "Swordsman 2: Dong Fangbubai" starring Jet Li, it performed very well.

In my opinion, there are two reasons, but the quality of the work itself is excellent. I experienced all the ups and downs in Li's version, and the characterization in the play made me feel * * * about the original. When I was a child, I watched Xiao Ao's version 96 and 0 1 on TV, but they were only a few episodes. I really read it all in college. I not only watched these two films, but also watched the Richie Jen version, skimmed a few episodes of the Ma Jingtao version, and watched Wallace Huo and Ding Guansen.

At that time, it was a unified watch of the original TV series. There are no special childhood filters and no aesthetic changes. Generally speaking, it is best to watch version 0 1. The characterization, plot adaptation and shooting all show a Jianghu atmosphere that meets my requirements. You know, it was already 16 when I completely read these, which was long enough. Because of the excellent quality of his works, he was able to go from 5.9 to 8.0.

This is the biggest problem in the Zhang Jizhong edition. As for the reason, there is no need to delve into it. It may be the level of the creators themselves, or there may be other reasons. Li's is not bad, a little bitter and bitter, but almost perfect. If there is shyness according to the original, the killing degree in the original is too abnormal, which belongs to the demand of extreme characterization in popular literature, so let it be. As for the score of "The Way of Flattery", it seems that it belongs to the level of the four classic novels of CCTV, and there is basically nothing to be picky about.

As for the problem itself, it is very simple, or because mainstream netizens don't have a deep impression on the Hong Kong version, and the basic level of this drama is above the current level of new drama. There is no doubt about the vitality of Jin Yong's novels, so the characters and plots of Jin Yong's TV dramas can't be out of date. The key point is that the new drama has broken through the aesthetic lower limit, so we can only dig out these old dramas to make do.

The main reason, I think, is the alternation of the audience's right to speak. Take myself as an example. There are three TV dramas, and my parents and I have had major differences on the issue of "whether the drama is good or not". Eight Dragons (Hu Jun Edition), New Shanghai Beach (Huang Xiaoming Edition), and then Li Edition. The quality of the play was relatively up to standard, which touched some people at that time. My parents couldn't accept a remake after watching the Hong Kong version of the legendary swordsman in their early years. So from the beginning of the remake, they were very resistant. I have to admit, this is very similar to our current attitude towards partial remake.

Although I saw those, I was not as impressed as them, so I didn't object to the remake at that time. After the remake, I obviously think all three plays are very good. My parents can't accept it, sneer and spit. Li's version of the legendary swordsman, I think Saint Aunt is beautiful, and the scenery is very atmospheric. Most importantly, there are two plots that I was really moved at that time. First, my younger brother and Xiao Linzi made a snowman, while my older brother broke through the snowdrift and "humiliated his younger brother" and fought wildly. Second, Yang Ge's death, coupled with the music of "Jianghu Children's Day is decreasing, the heart is still there, and people are gone", was simply crying to death.

At that time, I really thought the play was good and beautiful, and there were some plots that moved me. But it was scolded by mainstream public opinion at that time. After many years, now its score can be improved. I think maybe the play did pass the quality test at that time. At that time, it touched a group of small audiences at that time and made them feel good, so they were willing to come back and re-score. The replacement of network discourse power. In fact, there are more than one film and television drama with such "reverse comments". Others, such as Hu Jun's Dragon, and magic mobile phones.

Wait, the evaluation is so bad that I can't even admit that I like it. It also includes "Xian Jian San", which was basically the voice of spit. At the beginning, it was not as good as "Xian Jian I" in all aspects, but now it has received rave reviews. Even "Xian Jian Yi", which was originally spit out and didn't respect games, is now receiving rave reviews. These film and television dramas were all spit in the past; Nowadays, after the change of the times, their word-of-mouth has reversed, and some even become memories of a generation and are regarded as classics.

Did people who didn't like it suddenly like it? No, the person I like grew up and began to master the right to speak on the Internet. These dramas touched some viewers who didn't have the right to speak online at that time. Many years later, people who like these dramas grew up and mastered the right to speak on the internet, so they rehabilitated these dramas they once liked.

It is also the memory of this generation, and the filter works. Those plays of that year had a great influence on the audience at that time. That's their youth and memories, so they have filters. These dramas are also the time memories of these people who now have the right to speak on the Internet. They also represent our youth and memories, and our subconscious mind also filters them. The filter of youth and memory will inspire some viewers to give high marks to their favorite dramas.

The influence of Hong Kong opera is declining. The perception of influence is subtle. Hong Kong drama once influenced many people and received a lot of praise, even zzzq. Later, mainland drama influenced many people and won many praises. At one time, he even praised continental drama and criticized Hong Kong Opera, which became the influence of New Hong Kong Opera. In the process of osmosis, it gradually declined. Ordinary people, in the end, are mostly conformity. Under such a subtle influence and extreme herd mentality, the evaluation of Hong Kong dramas is not as good as before. Above. But the most important reason is that all the people I liked at that time are online now.