One link is linked with another, indicating that things will not be caused unilaterally. From the point of view of moral explanation, this sentence is too widely applied, ignoring the role of time (some things happen not at the same time, but in sequence), which is quite absolute. It is a personal subjective guess and judgment before the outcome of the matter is thoroughly understood (investigating the facts).
Because it is a subjective thing, the criteria for guessing and judging are related to personal feelings, likes and dislikes, experience reserves, knowledge level, way of thinking and many other factors.
For example:
For example, the phenomenon of two people fighting in the above example requires a full understanding of the ins and outs of the fighting incident and the usual behavior of two people in order to make a correct and reasonable treatment.
To put it simply, we should proceed from the true nature of the facts, not take them for granted. Generally speaking, people who make this kind of thinking mistake are mainly those who have rich work experience and like to rely on empirical judgment and some people who are emotional or mean in thinking, and some people simply and rashly like to use the so-called "dialectical method".
These people's knowledge and understanding of dialectical methods are superficial. The core of dialectical method is to develop contradictions caused by movement changes and pay attention to asymmetry and imbalance. But these people think that the dialectical method is semi-open, 50-50 open and mechanically symmetrical, so they like people who play 50 boards each.
Baidu Encyclopedia-It takes two hands to make a sound.