"How bold people are, how productive the land is" was a popular phrase during the Cultural Revolution. This classic quotation once made many people in China almost crazy! At that time, the sound of China's per mu yield was everywhere, followed by other "satellites" from all walks of life flying all over the sky. Hundreds of millions of children in China are immersed in the incomparable enthusiasm of "surpassing Britain and catching up with the United States" ... but in the next three years, people experienced the "food barrier" of eating wild vegetables, eating bark and even eating people. At that time, the master who put forward "what to do if there is more food" didn't know what to do for three years. In short, today, when it comes to "how bold people are and how productive the land is", most people hate it and can't bear to look back.

After the discussion that "practice is the only criterion for testing truth", people all agree that "how bold people are and how productive they are" is completely wrong, but is it really completely wrong? I'm afraid not!

During the Great Leap Forward and the people's commune movement, it was put forward that "how bold people are, how high the land will be", which was a concrete manifestation of Hu's boasting. Its essence is the political behavior that some grassroots leading cadres make false reports step by step in order to gain political capital without investigation and research. Of course, some people think that "how bold people are, how productive the land will be", which is a manifestation of political passion. They hope to surpass Britain and catch up with the United States in a very short time (that is, "surpass Britain and catch up with the United States"), and even realize * * * productism ahead of schedule. We can't arbitrarily say that everyone is bragging, but we have to admit that it is a good wish that someone puts forward that "how bold people are and how productive the land is". However, this will is a short-term goal. At the same time, based on the lack of investigation and research, it is undoubtedly contrary to objective laws and the magic weapon of "seeking truth from facts". Then, it is not surprising that he later suffered because he violated objective laws.

Now people dare not put forward the slogan "How bold people are and how productive the land is". It is generally believed that this slogan is unrealistic and violates objective laws. Therefore, from bringing order out of chaos to the present, many cadres are stuck in the rut and dare not jump out of the box. They lost their enterprising thoughts in the past, but the temperament of daring to compete with the sun and the moon also disappeared. They are afraid to think, do, take risks and take responsibility, and only consider problems in a small field. As a result, they can run very fast and become crawling, but the top spot is guaranteed, but the local development speed is slow or even stagnant.

In fact, the statement that "how bold people are, how productive the land will be" is not completely wrong! During the Great Leap Forward and the people's commune movement, the mistakes of "how bold people are, how productive the land is" were as follows: First, no serious investigation and study was made; Second, treating a long-term goal as a short-term goal violates objective laws. If people at that time had the spirit of "how bold people are" and made "land is productive" a long-term goal, and then on the way to the goal, they paid attention to objective laws, relied on science and technology, made serious investigations and studies, and strictly standardized management, then we have reason to believe that the goal of "land is productive" is possible.

In the long history of the development of human society, there are many examples of how bold people are and how productive land is. A long time ago, human beings dreamed of going to heaven, and then planes and even rocket ships appeared, dreaming of going out to sea, and then ships and even submarines appeared. At that time, the idea of going to sea was much bolder than the Great Leap Forward and the people's commune movement, but it turns out that these dreams have all come true. If Chen Sheng and Guangwu didn't have the grandiloquence that "princes would rather have seeds", would there be a peasant uprising at the end of Qin Dynasty and shake the political foundation of Qin Ershi? If Yuan Longping, the "father of hybrid rice in the world", dares to do it, will he develop hybrid rice, spread it to the whole world, solve the problem of feeding people all over the world, realize his dreams and make contributions to people all over the world? Only when human beings have dreams can they keep moving forward, and dreams are a powerful driving force for human progress.

Therefore, the mistake of "how bold people are and how productive the land is" lies not in being bold, but in being bold but not careful. Now those leading cadres who are hidebound and do not make progress lack boldness of vision and boldness of vision! Guizhou is a poor and backward province. If every leading cadre can jump out of Guizhou to see Guizhou and dare to think about local development from the perspective of the president, how much "output" can't be achieved? As far as thinking is concerned, you can go. In the new historical period, facing the new situation, in the tide of fierce competition, if you dare not think and fight, you will fall behind, and if you fall behind, you will be beaten!