Before explaining why Churchill lost so lowly, it is necessary for us to know what these British people chose. Britain is a constitutional monarchy, and the emperor does not mention it. The administration of state affairs is the Cabinet, which is appointed by the Prime Minister. In other words, it is the Prime Minister who really holds state power in Britain.
So how did the Prime Minister come into being? Answer the election, but not the prime minister directly, but the members of the House of Commons. The whole of Britain is divided into 659 constituencies, and the House of Commons has 659 members. If a political party wins more than half of the seats in the election, the king will make their leader prime minister. If the majority party in the House of Commons fails to have more than half of the seats, then it is necessary to form a "floating parliament", that is, to govern jointly with the minority party.
This electoral system determines that the British Prime Minister must be closely related to his political party. No matter how good the prime minister is, the political party has also lost. Churchill's biggest problem was that he killed himself and a group of pig teammates around him. As the political party of indefinite prime minister in wartime, the Conservative Party devoted all its energy to military and diplomatic rights during World War II, and almost all internal rights were given up by the Conservative Party itself. When the Conservative Party gave up, the Labour Party naturally entered. Therefore, the closest combination with the people in wartime is the Labour Party, which has grown rapidly. 1945 Before the general election, the Labour Party had more than 2.6 million in party member and 8 million in party member.
In fact, if we look at the election time, we will find that at that time, World War II was not over and Japan was not bombed by atomic bombs. It is not the end of the war that wartime Prime Minister Churchill has no obligation to hold elections. At this time, the Labour Party launched a vote of no confidence in Churchill, demanding the dissolution of the wartime cabinet and re-election. At this time, Churchill had enough reasons to refuse, and the war was not completely over. But at this time, Churchill began to die, and he agreed. He lost his lead when the Conservative Party was not fully prepared for the election.
Then there is the god assist of a group of pig teammates. The Conservative Party's campaign slogan is "Choose a national leader and help him complete his historical mission", playing the Churchill card and preparing for "another huge and terrible war". The British people, oppressed by the war, are really tired of the historical mission. They just want to live a good life. What about the historical mission? Let me eat bread first, ok? On the other hand, the Labour Party is much wiser. Its slogan is "Let's face the future" and put forward a very detailed post-war recovery plan. Needless to say, the consequences? The Conservative Party's proposal in this election can be said to be the most unsuccessful one from 19 18 to 20 18.
When it comes to popular bipartisan exchanges, the pig teammates of the Conservative Party lost another game. They are as inferior as China's online sprayers, and the only way to get them out is to give the Labour Party a big hat. Constantly talking about the Labour Party as a Gestapo and a totalitarian, claiming that "the Labour Party's coming to power is a provocation to the honor and freedom of the British people". Will you be tired of reading the posts in the forum, and label others as "traitors" and "virtuous" because there is no argument and no information? When we read these posts, the British people's mood is basically the same. On the other hand, the Labour Party is much more cunning. They listed all the national losses caused by the Conservative Party in power, and then made no comment. At this time, it is inevitable that the Conservative Party will lose the election.
However, these idiots still feel that they are sure to win, waiting for the invoice to be elected, while the Labour Party goes deep into the constituency and sits in a broken car, giving speeches from city to city. Well, on the one hand, you are an arrogant and stubborn elite representative, on the other hand, you are a pragmatic and people-friendly grassroots representative. If you were British, who would you choose?
In this way, Comrade Churchill suffered a tragedy. One of the Big Three died, one lost his official position, and the remaining one was extremely obscene. To sum up, Churchill's failure is very simple, and his great reputation has not been translated into practical benefits. In an old electoral country like Britain, whoever shows the elite image is unlucky, and whoever shows the image of being close to the people wins. Look at the election of Trump and Hillary to understand this truth.