(Patiently read it, other letters are not important. )

A few months ago, Dr. Lei sent me a recording, hoping to sort out the content. This tape is the recording of a speech I attended several years ago. Daifeili Phillip Day, a senior British journalist, reported his experience in researching and tracking the medical field for more than ten years.

Recalling the contents of the speech at that time made my blood boil, and it was that speech that changed my views on diseases and disciplines. Most of the materials I read or studied in the following years were related to these new views.

Recently, I have carefully read the book Cancer-Why Do We Want to Know the Truth Again by De Feili. I admire this veteran reporter's skill of reeling silk from cocoons, GAI's complete observation and unique analysis, and I also admire his great compassion and fearless spirit.

Can we beat cancer or not?

According to the statistics of the American Cancer Society, cancer is the number one killer of Americans (and the number one cause of death of people in Taiwan Province Province); One third of people will get cancer; If it continues to develop, the incidence of cancer in the next century will be 100%. In the past 20 years, the number of women who died of breast cancer in the United States has exceeded the sum of the two world wars plus South Korea and Vietnam.

Cancer was solved decades ago, but the truth has been covered up. It was not until the development of the Internet that this solution gradually became popular.

However, how is the cancer policy in the United States formed?

Edward Griffin wrote The World without Cancer. Edward Griffin described the changes in modern medicine in the United States and the medical concept of disease: before World War II, the world's largest chemical pharmaceutical company was Fabian I.G. Farben of Germany. It is not only spread in 93 countries, but also became a notorious poison gas producer because of the massacre of Jewish concentration camps. In the 1920s, the largest pharmaceutical company in the world was established in cooperation with Rockefeller, an American industrial monopoly. Until today, it still plays an extremely important role in American science and anti-cancer policy.

The American Medical Association of American Medical College, sponsored by Rockwell Group and FDA, approved the patent application for chemical substances called "drugs" and provided them to doctors and experts who organized training.

At the beginning of the 20th century, Abel Han? Frayssines Abraham flexner, sponsored by the tax avoidance funds of Rockwell and Carnegie Andrew Carnegie, reformed medical schools in the United States, making doctors rely on drugs to treat diseases and engage in research on developing new drugs. In the list of important officials in government departments, it is not difficult to find many traces of connection with Rockwell Group. It can be seen that the influence of Rockwell Group on the US Food and Drug Administration and government departments at all levels can be said to be complete, interlocking and unbreakable.

Rockwell Group changed the old-fashioned medical behavior with money, made it modern, organized and commercialized, and became a pharmaceutical industry focusing on drug treatment. Turn the doctor's life from a poor doctor into a phoenix with high income, high education and high social status. These doctors are trained in medical centers built with the money of Rockwell Group and Carnegie Foundation, and their drug research has also received a lot of financial support.

In the 20th century, when commerce was at the forefront, the alternative therapies or treatments that could not be patented were not only not accepted by the mainstream medical community, but also frequently persecuted, smeared (labeled with no scientific evidence) and concealed. With the passage of time, the public has also accepted that mainstream medicine and the new drugs developed by it are the only sharp weapon to fight cancer. Therefore, in the first half of last century, international drug research invested millions of dollars, hoping to find effective drugs to treat various cancers. Because there is no so-called "miracle bullet" therapy that can be completed overnight, the medical center keeps experimenting with new drugs and radiation for patients. Even today, these chemotherapy and radiotherapy have proved unable to cure common cancers, and doctors continue to use them.

Newspapers often have news that new anticancer drugs have been invented successfully or that major breakthroughs have been made in cancer prevention, but has modern medicine really cured cancer? Some doctors can't help but suspect that the toxicity of chemotherapy is the main cause of death of cancer patients.

1985, John, Professor of Microbiology, Harvard University? John Cairns commented in Scientific American magazine: "Whether chemotherapy can cure any common cancer remains to be confirmed. 」

Some oncologists will tell patients that there is no evidence that chemotherapy is effective; Some people prescribe chemotherapy for money. Because prescribing chemotherapy is more cost-effective than comforting patients.

Dai Feili even bluntly said that in today's $70 billion chemotherapy industry, more people live on cancer than die of cancer. Dai quoted many mainstream doctors who kept saying that chemotherapy was ineffective. For example: 1992, toxicologist Miao Shan? Dr Samuel Epstein and three former US federal officials wrote a statement in Washington, D.C., which was supported by 64 leading experts in the fields of public health, cancer prevention and disease prevention. He pointed out: "We are very concerned that the National Cancer Institute of the United States, the American Anti-Cancer Association and more than 20 perfect cancer treatment centers with strong financial resources continue to declare' victory over cancer', misleading and confusing the American public and Congress. Today, cancer kills more than half a million people every year, and one third of Americans suffer from cancer. In the past decade, 5 million Americans have died of cancer, and more and more evidence shows that most of these deaths can be avoided ... and the cancer industry and major pharmaceutical companies are also preparing to make a statement without evidence, saying that cancer treatment has made significant progress or "cured" cancer news. Only based on the initial atrophy of tumor tissue, rather than prolonging the survival time of patients, the quality of life of patients was seriously damaged by highly toxic treatment and completely ignored. 1986, scientists from McGill Cancer Center conducted a questionnaire survey on 1 18 doctors who treated non-small cell lung cancer. The results showed that more than three-quarters of doctors asked patients to experiment with highly toxic new drugs for lung cancer.

They were also asked, if they had cancer themselves, which of the six new drugs they chose at that time would they treat? Of the 79 respondents, 64 said they would not choose any new chemotherapy drugs containing highly toxic cisplatin. Fifty-eight doctors found that all new drugs were ineffective because of the ineffectiveness and unacceptably high toxicity of chemotherapy. German clinical cancer biostatistician Yurish? Ulrich Abel put forward the research experience of chemotherapy for advanced epithelial cancer in 1990 Journal of Rehabilitation. He calmly and fairly analyzed the medical reports of the past decade and found that chemotherapy for the most common epithelial cancers, such as lung cancer, breast cancer, nursing cancer and rectal cancer, was rarely successful.

More than one million people worldwide die of cancer every year. Most of them have received chemotherapy and used it more and more frequently. Ai Bo also conducted a questionnaire survey among hundreds of doctors and found: "Many doctors' personal views on cancer are quite different from the information known to the public. "If they have cancer, they won't do chemotherapy! Even if cancer cells respond to chemotherapy, local or complete tumor shrinkage will not prolong the survival rate of patients. Sometimes the recurrence of cancer is even more rampant, because chemotherapy encourages the formation of anti-treatment cancer cells. Dr. Eber compared the improvement of survival rate between patients who received chemotherapy and those who did not receive chemotherapy according to different cancers. Statistics show that:

Colorectal cancer: There is no evidence that the survival rate of chemotherapy patients has improved.

Gastric cancer: There is no obvious evidence.

Pancreatic cancer: the survival rate is completely ineffective; Patients who have not received chemotherapy live longer.

Bladder cancer: No clinical trials.

Breast cancer: There is no direct evidence that chemotherapy prolongs the survival rate, and the use of chemotherapy is morally questionable (most breast cancer patients received chemotherapy before and after surgery).

Ovarian cancer: There is no direct evidence.

Uterus and cervical cancer: the survival rate has not improved.

Head and neck cancer: the survival rate has not improved, but has shrunk sporadically.

French oncologist, Charlie? Dr Charles Mathe even said, "If I have cancer, I will never go to a cancer treatment center. The farther away patients are from these centers, the better their chances of survival. 」

Harding from the University of California? Dr. Jones Hardin Jones said after analyzing the survival statistics of cancer patients for decades, "Cancer patients may be better without treatment. Testimonies from oncologists like this abound in Dai's books. Why should doctors tell patients that they can treat diseases that they are helpless about?

Ken, who enjoys the nickname "Einstein in Psychology"? Wilbur (Ken Wilbur) described the process of his wife's cancer in Grace and Courage (published by Teacher Zhang).

He mentioned that a good friend had terminal cancer, and her doctor suggested another very intense chemotherapy. If she does as the doctor says, she should live 12 months. She asked a question: "How long can I live if I don't receive chemotherapy?" ? The doctor replied: "14 months. 」

Ken's comment: "To be honest, it also prevents patients from seeking other treatments ... This is not treating diseases at all, it is treating heart disease-some treatments may not be effective for diseases, but they can guide patients to listen to some authority and receive some medical treatment. 」

Oncologists will not try to manipulate patients maliciously, nor will they deliberately hide their limited skills. Because medical treatment is ineffective for cancer, doctors are forced to play the role of comforting patients, although such a role is untrained for doctors. But in the eyes of patients, the doctor is indeed a powerful priest. Most mainstream doctors are unfamiliar with alternative therapy and have a busy life, so they have to rely on medical research or experimental briefings as information sources; Most of these briefings are prepared by organizations that oppose alternative therapies, such as pharmaceutical companies or cancer medical centers.

Because cancer patients are the profit center of hospitals, mainstream cancer treatment methods are deeply rooted in the hearts of the people in the United States today because they can make hospitals earn the most money and insurance is willing to pay the bill. Therefore, the current American cancer medical policy will continue to cover up the facts unless you wake up from their myth.

So what are the chances of cancer patients?

17, a new vitamin b, also known as amygdalin and amygdalin, was isolated from Ernst T. Krebs, Jr. in the 1950s. He doesn't know what kind of ripple he caused, although many people still believe that krebs has found a cure for cancer. However, due to the inability of international pharmaceutical companies to apply for patents, they monopolized the use of vitamin B 17 and launched a vicious attack on VitB 17, even though it proved to be effective against various cancers.

Krebs and his father were also pioneers in applying vitamin B 15 pantothenic acid in medicine. His research before World War II mainly focused on enzymes and their applications in cancer treatment, including bromelain, chymotrypsin and papain. Father and son are also recognized as pioneers in the treatment of cancer with vitamin B 17.

Vitamin B 17 is a water-soluble carbohydrate compound, which exists in about 800 kinds of plants in nature. VitB 17 is rich in non-citrus fruits, such as cherries, nectarines, peaches, plums and apples. Apricots for kernel are the most abundant, accounting for 2~2.5%.

According to Griffins' book A World Without Cancer, the study of krebs can be traced back to the early 20th century, when Professor John? John Beard Beard put forward the trophoblast inference of cancer. Bi found that there was no difference between pre-embryonic cells (that is, vegetative cells) and malignant tumor cells in early pregnancy. Trophoblast cells are necessary for embryo growth, but on the 56th day of pregnancy, the fetal new pancreas began to secrete chymotrypsin * * enzyme, and since then, the proliferation of trophoblast cells has been prevented.

Ge wrote: "The vegetative cell ball does have the characteristics of cancer cells in the early pregnancy, because it will rapidly proliferate and spread, and finally it will implant on the uterine wall to form a placenta, so that the embryo can be protected and nourished by the mother. Nutritive cell ball is formed by another cell through a series of steps. Gerhardt simplified it as "whole life cell" (a bit like the most popular stem cell now), which can differentiate into any organ or tissue, even a complete embryo. When fully living cells are stimulated by male and female estrogens and begin to make trophoblast cells, there are two possible outcomes.

First, if you are pregnant, you will form placenta and umbilical cord;

Second, if it is started under the condition of repair, the result is the formation of cancer cells.

Ge added: More correctly, if the cell repair project is not completed, cancer will form. Chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) is a kind of reproductive hormone, which is stimulated by villi secreted by vegetative cells and can be detected in urine with an accuracy of 92%. Assuming that the test is positive, if it is a woman, she is either pregnant or has cancer; If it is male, there is only one possibility-cancer. The medical profession knows that this detection method is simple, but it is abandoned, and high-risk puncture surgery is adopted, which leads to the spread of some cancer cells throughout the body.

Krebs separated vitamin B 17 from almond, and synthesized it into crystals for human use, and named it "Lirdrovermouth". This compound is formed by combining one molecule of hydrogen cyanide with one molecule of phenylacetaldehyde and two molecules of glucose. Although the first two are very toxic when separated, they are very stable and non-toxic when combined in VitB 17 molecules. Krebner found that only one glucoamylase called β -glucosidase can open the binding bond between them. Although this enzyme is distributed in human body, its content is particularly high in tumors. Therefore, once β -glucosidase secreted by cancer cells breaks the binding bond of VitB 17, hydrogen cyanide and phenylacetaldehyde will be released. Together, the two toxic molecules are more toxic, and cancer cells die in VitB 17 of their own choice.

Rhodamine, another enzyme secreted by healthy cells, plays a leading role in the second half, and its distribution is just opposite to β -glucosidase Rhodamine is distributed in normal cells of the whole body, but not in tumor cells. Therefore, if VitB 17 meets healthy cells, the rhodamine substances secreted by healthy cells can dissolve the toxicity of hydrogen cyanide, hydrogen peroxide and phenylacetaldehyde, and their by-products are thiocyanate and benzoic acid respectively, which can nourish normal cells and excrete the excess with urine.

The above two paragraphs show that VitB 17 can accurately target cancer cells without damaging normal tissues. This natural compound targeting the target substance is more effective than any artificial, non-selective and super-toxic chemotherapy drug, which can kill both good cells and bad cells at the same time.

Dai cited the views of many scientists and doctors that cancer is a metabolic disease related to diet. 1936 the United States Senate published an article to the effect that the health of the body depends entirely on the minerals we ingest from food, which are more dependent than calories, vitamins or standard starch, protein or carbohydrates. Most Americans today have some kind of malnutrition, and unless our soil can get balanced minerals, it can't be improved.

Because our soil lacks too many minerals, no matter how much food we eat, we can't provide the minerals we need for health, because no one's stomach is big enough to accommodate these foods. This is the same as what Dr. Lei and Dr. Lei have been calling for-the health of the body should start with improving the soil. Because farmers' income is determined by their output, not how many nutrients and minerals are added (except NPK, which can affect their output). Therefore, once the soil can't provide enough minerals, various metabolic defects will appear in daily life. Back in the history of medicine, many chronic diseases are now preventable.

Dai cited a case of scurvy in the book to echo his views. From the 9th century 17 to 19, Britain, France and Spain sent a large number of ships to expand their maritime territory. After a long voyage, sailors had no fruits and vegetables to eat, and gradually became septic, which once claimed the lives of millions of sailors.

Although in the15th century and18th century, different navigators and scientists found that Indian pine needles and bark were rich in antioxidants, or people who ate oranges, lemons and a lot of fruits and vegetables would not get scurvy. But the mainstream medical profession at that time completely ignored and despised these facts, leading to more deaths.

It was not until the end of18th century that the Royal Navy finally paid attention to these scientific evidences and incorporated "edible fruits and vegetables at sea" into the naval norms. /kloc-After the 0/9th century, there was no septicemia in the British navy, thus creating modern people and a country where the sun never sets.

In the 1930 s, vitamin C was separated and septicemia was eliminated. It took 450 years and millions of lives to believe that simple fruits and vegetables can prevent and treat this chronic metabolic disease. By analogy, once-fatal diseases, such as pernicious anemia, Italian hysterical pellagra, beriberi, countless nervous system diseases, etc. Can be prevented and treated through diet. Krebs's famous saying: Only the truly curable can truly prevent the truly curable. The necessary nutrition comes from a well-nourished diet.

So is cancer a metabolic disease?

Hello, Director of Biology Department of loyola University, loyola University? Dr. Harold Manner, a doctor in Mandy, put forward his opinion: In recent years, the view on the cause of cancer has been evaluated from the old view caused by virus, carcinogen or wound infection.

More and more scientists believe that cancer is a complex disease caused by metabolic problems. It is a recessive disease, involving the whole body function from nervous system, digestive tract, pancreas, lung, secretory organs, endocrine system to the whole immune system. The patient's cancer recurred after receiving surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy in mainstream medicine because the most fundamental metabolic reasons were never taken seriously, so that they were not corrected or treated. That is, the most fundamental nutritional problem has not been solved.

Griffins, the author of A World Without Cancer, wrote a book to prove that cancer is a nutritional deficiency disease, not caused by germs, viruses or mysterious poisons, but by some nutrients lacking in modern people's diet.

If this analysis is correct, then the treatment and prevention of cancer will be very easy and cheap; Just restoring our diet? Just use "I". Beard and krebs found that many cells in human body are still in embryonic stage. These cells are used to repair tissues. According to special morphological gene stimulation, they can differentiate into any tissue, organ, blood or hair of the body.

When our body is damaged, estrogen will stimulate these cells to repair the injured area. When it is repaired, pancreatin will shut down the repair project. If this repair function is not turned off, these cells will form tumors or cancers due to continuous and lawless division and repair. In other words, cancer is produced by the body itself, not foreign objects, and it can escape the surveillance of the immune system in the name of repair project.