Let’s talk about a feminist genre that I advocate.

I advocate non-socialist existential feminism.

Being socialist is existentialism.

Existential feminism emphasizes the transcendence of the so-called "innerness" of women, trying to get rid of the state of "other" and "otherness", so that female subject consciousness can be established and women become a free subject , realize their own value.

When one's worth is not proven by bullying another, that's existentialism.

Representative figure of existential feminism: Beauvoir

Social leaders cannot see their own appearance. They must confirm their own happiness through the misfortune of others. Only from the envious eyes of others can I believe that I am doing well.

If they don’t suppress others and don’t enjoy the admiration of others, they can’t even confirm that they are alive.

How sad and ridiculous!

Fei Sheda does not need to be so troublesome, because she has her own inner world, and it is not an isolated inner world. It is connected to human beings as a whole, and to the past and future of human beings. She looks lonely, but in fact she has a rich heart.

Existentialism is to realize that contrasting relationships are not the essence of human beings.

The misfortune of others is not your happiness. If you still admit that you are a member of the human race, the misfortune of others is our own misfortune.

How many people can see this level and think of this level?

In addition to the clarification of the above concepts, let’s put aside the moral factors and talk about why we chose non-socialist existential feminism.

Many sisters say that women want to seize power.

Very good, how to seize the law?

This is simply an abstract concept. It’s not like we’re going to grab the jade seal!

What is the nature of power? is the number of supporters.

So, dreaming of seizing power overnight is like playing house for a three-year-old child.

Some sisters say that women’s rights also require social development, and use magic to defeat magic.

Under the rules set by patriarchy that favor men, you have to use the same tactics as men to defeat men. Sorry, mathematically, it's like because agt;b,bgt;c, therefore cgt;a. Such an obvious mistake.

The biggest dilemma of women’s rights is not the direct oppression of men, but that while women are victims, they are also the most powerful thugs of men’s rights. They replace men and carry out the most direct discipline and supervision of women. This is the most typical example. It's mother to daughter.

That is, female competition.

Those who love the male must compete with the female!

The first step in promoting women’s rights is not to directly confront men’s rights, but to dismantle female competition.

In a patriarchal society, men are the superiors and women are the inferiors.

What women’s rights want to achieve is equality.

Because the slave could not afford the price of freedom, she not only looked for the slave owner, but she also hated other slaves who were more beautiful than her. This is female competition and slave competition.

So, appearance shaming and slut shaming are very prevalent among women. This is the internal dividing force that women’s rights face.

To "seize power", we must first purge internal forces. If the internal divisions are so divided, how can there be support from external forces? How can we start to seize power?

The biggest dilemma for women’s rights is that in a patriarchal society, men’s short-term interests and long-term interests are unified; while women’s short-term interests and long-term interests are separated.

The reason for separation is that a woman is already deeply enslaved, so her short-term interest is to find a good slave master, and she is afraid that other slaves will take away her slave master.

If women are willing to be individuals, short-term and long-term interests will be unified.

Remove the servility of women, make them spiritually independent, and become a non-socialist. They can feel their own value without relying on the gaze and selection of slave owners, and become a true existentialist.

If women cannot learn to be human beings, look at problems from a long-term perspective, only care about immediate slave interests, supervise and discipline each other, women’s rights will never be realized!

Leaving aside moral factors and human dignity, from the perspective of purely achieving goals, women’s rights are “unworthy” of society!

Sheda’s feminism will only further increase divisions among women and get further and further away from the goal of feminism.

So, from this perspective, it is necessary for women’s rights to “punish” the “traitors” of Sheda and Nujing. That is to say, we firmly do not support wife’s rights and socialist women’s rights.

If women’s rights support wife’s rights, it will turn most women into slaves of men. Good wife’s rights, that is, marriages that protect the weak, will turn all women into weak ones. Is slavery that protects slaves not slavery?

As long as there are slaves, there will be slave competition, which is Sheda.

On the other hand, as long as society is prosperous, it will inevitably produce slaves and slave owners.

I will never understand the joy of those who are jealous, hen-competing, enslaving, and comparing themselves to others. Although I understand their psychological mechanism, I really cannot agree with their bad taste.

I want this to stop.

The women’s rights I want may not be realized in the limited history of mankind, let alone in my own lifetime. It doesn't matter. As an INTP, I only know that my logical deduction is correct and my emotions are just. That's enough. This is my greatest joy.

Ideals can never be realized in one's own life. Preparation can be realized in one's short life. That is called "plan".

Feminism is my ideal, not my plan.

Has been authorized by the author, and the copyright belongs to the author. Please contact the author for any form of reprinting.

Author: Non-linear non-regression (from Douban)