Science is supposed to represent wisdom. The purpose of setting up "science" is to tell people that some facts exist in the universe, dissect many things that people don't know truly and sincerely, and solve the mysteries that people in the world can't know.
Everyone knows about religious circles. Buddhism emphasizes practicing and not committing crimes. The word "Islam" means "peace" in Arabic. Christianity stresses "love" and "holiness" and demands to stay away from crimes. Common sense tells mankind that "religion" belongs to the product of "morality", and the moral norms that guide human ideology can completely live in harmony. However, Darwinism has changed the direction of the meaning of "science". Instead of discovering the existence of unknowable facts for in-depth study and exploration, it is simpler than ordinary people-throwing them away. Whatever you can't see, what you can't figure out, and what you can't put in the laboratory, no matter how true, are all put aside. Or religious belief, superstition or idealism, a broom sweeps into the dustbin and enters a dead end. You don't go in yourself or allow others to go in. Therefore, people's expected "science" has lasted for more than 15 years. Until today, there will be so many unsolved mysteries in the world. Many so-called "science" has become a child's play nowadays. Darwin's "science" has only done what the peasants have done, and completely lost its value. It seems that transsexuality and theology are at odds today, and the concept of "Darwin" has become synonymous with science above all else; I always think that science is called not talking about heaven and God, and all that can't enter the laboratory can't be called "science". However, the struggle philosophy "evolution", an unprovable belief, which will never enter the laboratory, has become a "science" that does not allow criticism. A bright and tidy room, because the dirt of the light bulb makes people blurred and can't see the truth, which brings trouble to the real high-tech achievements and is also wronged.
why have "science" and "religion" become sworn enemies! Why can't there be morality if there is science? Why do science and religious beliefs, especially the Christian church, become at odds today?
Obviously, a "science" without morality cannot be called "science" from the perspective of human truth.
So what debunks "natural selection" and makes "natural selection" impossible is anti-science? China has many valuable classics; For example, duke of zhou, Ma Yi Xiang Fa, Huangdi Neijing, etc., after years of exploration, the author has also confirmed by many records in history that more than 9% of them are accurate. So what is the basis of its connection? Can't it be proved that "natural selection" is religion because of these? Anti-science?
the "big bang" theory: the universe was born from nothing, so this "nothing" can only be an incomprehensible point that does not actually exist, but it is actually a matter with infinite energy level, which is completely inconsistent with our existing theories and concepts, but it is an irrefutable scientific conclusion;
gagrin crater, which is the deepest on the surface of the moon, is 186 miles wide in diameter and should be at least 7 miles deep, but in fact the depth of Gagrin Crater is only 4 miles, only 2% of its diameter. This is not true in scientific theory, but it is true in fact;
As early as thousands of years ago, when there were no advanced tools, there were huge stones more than 1 miles away, deep in the tropical jungle where there were no roads or waterways for transportation, and pyramids with a height of more than 1 tons of stones as high as 7 meters were beyond the reach of human beings today. Is that impossible? But the facts do exist.
can't there be whispers's theory if there is scientific theory? Is creationism anti-scientism? Can't there be Christians without Darwin? Is it anti-scientific to question Darwinian "evolution"? The controversy about "evolution" within the scientific community is no less than that between atheists and Christians. However, the scientific community and atheists can never prove the non-existence of the spiritual world.
When it comes to in-depth scientific research, it is natural to encounter many problems that span the perception of three-dimensional space and cannot be explained and proved by the existing scientific level and means of human beings, but they do exist. It can't be said that this is religious belief, not science.
John who won the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine in p>1963? Sir Eickel has always believed that "man is a wonderful compound composed of tangible and intangible spirits."
Even materialists who think that they don't exist when they can't see them believe that some behaviors or actions made by hands or feet are directed by immaterial brain thinking. If you want that girl to be your wife or that young man to be your husband, first of all, your brain always produces immaterial "love". Because the invisible "love" pushes the tangible body to create words or forms that attract each other. Never let your tangible body pounce on the person you have never known without saying a word to achieve the purpose of completing your spouse; If such a person will be diagnosed, why is it called? So what kind of title will be diagnosed as a scientist who only admits tangible substances and denies them invisibly? You can't really call it an ape! Besides, this "invisibility" is only for the naked eye.
Today, with the discovery and further study of dark matter and dark energy, I believe that the scientific community is fully capable of discovering the invisible and intangible matter and life in the spiritual world of higher intelligence. However, science is to explore and study the existing matter in the universe, and it will never break through the universe and become the only truth. There are many things in the universe that can't enter the laboratory, whether tangible or intangible. With the existing scientific level and means of human beings, it is still impossible to explain many problems that are perceived as "crossing three-dimensional space", but they do exist. What can't be solved can't be solved, so to really solve the mysteries of the world, we must start with understanding religion. At least understand some papers about religious beliefs, and then combine, compare and study them with the reality in history, with hardware and software.
the forefront of science and technology is in the spiritual region, not the physics and chemistry of matter. When science is dissolved in religion (as it is called today), it is when science is highly developed and when the mysteries of the world are solved.
There was a famous saying: "The end of science is the beginning of faith". Dr. Robert Jastrow, the founder of NASA and the Space Research Institute, said in the book "God and Tianmen Studies": "For a scientist who lives by rational forces, the ending of this story is like a nightmare. He has been climbing the mountain of ignorance ... When he climbed the last stone, he was welcomed by a group of theologians who have been waiting there for countless centuries. "
Millikan, who won the Nobel Prize in Physics, said: "Because the universe is beyond the scope of scientific knowledge, it is beyond the reach of human intelligence. This area where human wisdom can't be seen is the religious area. ..... Human wisdom is limited, and we can't fully understand the ultimate mystery of the universe. ..... Real modern science should learn humility and obey the creator ".
In p>1865, the British Science Society published a manifesto on religion and science signed by 617 experts, which is now in the Bordelon Library in Oxford. The declaration reads as follows: "We express our views on the relationship between science and religion as natural scientists. At present, some people in the scientific community doubt the truth and correctness of the Bible because they seek scientific truth. We are deeply sorry here ";
"We believe that the existence of God is written in the Bible on the one hand and in the universe on the other. Although they are different in form, they will never conflict with each other";
"We should bear in mind that physical science is not perfect, but is still improving. At present, our limited understanding seems to be looking in the mirror, but it is still vague";
"At present, many scholars in natural science do not study the Bible, but rely on its incomplete laws and little knowledge to doubt and oppose it. This attitude cannot but make us regret it";
"We are convinced that every scientist studies nature with the sole purpose of clarifying the truth. However, the results of their research have found that the Bible is in conflict with science, and its essence is a misinterpretation of the Bible. We must not rashly and arbitrarily think that his conclusion is correct and the records in the Bible are wrong. Instead, we should take an objective attitude, be calm, listen to God's instructions, and be sure that the two must be consistent, and we must never be paranoid and think that there are conflicts and differences between science and the Bible. "
The article in the C/13-16 edition of qianjiang evening news on November 19, 28 said: "Science is human's understanding and ability to transform nature; Religion in a broad sense has existed in primitive society, which is even older than civilization. Therefore, science and religion in a broad sense are also the two major forces that have brought mankind to today. " At the end of the article, Professor He Guanghu, the famous philosophy department of China Renmin University, clearly pointed out: "Neither science nor religion advocates destroying and plundering nature. The Bible says that God left the world to be repaired, not destroyed. People should be guarded and managed, not plundered and squeezed. There is also a basic view in Christianity: God is the master of the world, and human beings are only the "stewards" of the world; The housekeeper can't pretend to be the master, and take whatever she wants for herself, but she can only do her duty and take good care of the master's property. It is on this basis that we say that religion and science can engage in dialogue and then cooperate to promote the welfare of mankind. "
The famous Mr. Pan Shiyi once said in the forum to build social civilization and understand the truth of mankind: "In the world, there is only one truth and only one truth in everything. No matter what way we discuss it, as long as we are in the spirit of truly seeking truth, we will eventually reach the same goal. Find the only truth, find the truth, reach agreement and unity, and there will be no harmony without the truth ";
"The purpose of science is to explore the truth of things, discover the laws between things, and discover the truth. The way science adopts is "discovery", and the purpose of approaching the truth is achieved by discovering the laws between things. And religious belief is in the form of "revelation". If we only admit the scientific way of "discovery" and not the religious way of "revelation", people will surely fall into the quagmire of extreme materialism without faith and direction. There are many phenomena in the world that are difficult to explain in a scientific way. For example, "love" and "happiness" are hard to express clearly no matter what scientific formulas and theorems are used, but they do exist. Understanding the world in two different ways, science and religion, will be closer to the truth and our hearts. If we only focus on exploring the truth in a scientific way, we will ignore our inner feelings and spend a lot of energy and time observing the outside world and looking outward; If you only seek the truth by revelation, meditate, sit still and pray all day, and only pay attention to your inner feelings and the revelation from magical power, you will ignore the existence and changes outside. Science and religious belief are two wheels of a car and two wings of a bird, and neither can be neglected. Only when they develop in a balanced way can harmony be achieved. In the past century, the development of science and technology has advanced by leaps and bounds. Under such circumstances, people should have firm beliefs and restrain themselves with higher moral standards. We cannot ignore the influence of this magical power of faith on our progress. "
French chemist and Nobel Prize winner Sabatier said, "I think it is unreasonable and useless to advocate the opposition between science and religion. Those who advocate this argument probably don't know clearly about religion and science. "
A sage named Abdul Baja said a passage that clearly explained the relationship between science and religious belief. He said: "If religious beliefs and views are in opposition to the standards of science, then he is only superstitious and illusory, because the opposite of knowledge is ignorance, and ignorance leads to superstition. There is no doubt that the correct religion and science are the same. If we find that a problem conflicts with the truth, we can't believe and believe in it, and it won't have any results except confusing and shaking people. "
Kant, a well-known scholar, once said, "There are two things that amaze me, one is the greatness and wonder of the universe, and the other is the peculiar function of conscience in the depths of human hearts. People can see the wisdom created by God everywhere as long as they look up at the size of heaven and earth and look down at the variety of categories. Similarly, as long as people reflect on themselves and listen to the voice of conscience, they can also understand God's guidelines for guiding people to do good. These two things are enough to help people who are honest and face life seriously to seek God seriously.
Einstein, the father of the atomic bomb, once said, "Science without religion is lame, and religion without science is blind." "the biography of Edison wrote:' one day, some journalists asked him for permission to publish his anti-religious remarks in the newspaper. He said angrily: people with philosophical thoughts should always accept the facts that they have to admit. Judging from the performance of everything, the universe is really a great achievement of the will of the Almighty. If I deny the existence of supreme power, I will be scorning my own knowledge. Science and religion come from the same source, and there will never be any conflict between them. I believe in my Lord's instruction that people and things are led by a leader. The fate of the world is dominated by a supreme person. " He also said:' I am such a person, I admire all engineers in the world, but I deeply admire the greatest engineer-God.'
French modern chemist Mill said in G Kenig's article "Light on the Road": "I see that the more inventions scientists make, the more problems they cause, and the more I feel naive and ignorant. ..... In front of this natural scene, you can't help but create a wonderful mystery of the universe in your heart. You can't help but feel that there is its creator above this universe. He is omnipotent and good, and he is the creator of the physical universe and the spiritual world. "
"Can a real scientist be a Christian at the same time?" This is a question put forward by L Lange, a modern French astrophysicist and a famous authority on elementary particle physics. His answer is yes, he said: "I am a man of faith, and I have never lost my religious belief."
In the Memoirs of a Report written by Max Planck, the inventor of quantum theory, a famous German physicist, the winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics and one of the greatest scientists in the 2th century, it is said: "No matter where we look or where we think there is a great distance, the cosmic order and the religious God are linked. It is impossible to find a contradiction between religion and science; But for the biggest problem, I see complete agreement. Religion and science are not mutually exclusive; On the contrary, they are mutually completed, as if they have the conditions to complement each other. "
Newton wrote 1.5 million words of theological works in his later years to prove the existence of God. Who can say that Newton must not be a scientist?
Maya people who used calendars with higher accuracy thousands of years ago than we do now. The huge unit "Alaudon", which is only needed when measuring interstellar distance, can be used for timing. Their level of science and technology is obviously higher than that of today's world, and their wisdom is obviously stronger than that of.