The topic of "when everyone is crying, someone should be allowed not to cry" suddenly appeared in front of me. I wanted to write an argumentative paper on it and suddenly fainted.
What does this mean? Surely it's not just literal? Hurry up and Baidu.
As a result of Baidu's coming out, this is a sentence that Mr. Mo Yan said. Really, once a person is famous, saying anything casually is a famous saying, which will make students and parents very unhappy.
This is my niece's Chinese homework for grade three.
The question is, why do students have to involve their parents in writing? What kind of parent-child activity is this? Wow, students have been hovering in the whirlpool of double subtraction for some time. How can this subtraction be added to parents' heads?
If parents are illiterate, he doesn't deserve to have children as parents? !
Complain to complain, reluctant to part with. This argumentative paper should be carefully conceived, mainly not to let the children lose face in front of the teacher.
In fact, in order not to lose face, we must first write this argumentative paper with clear arguments, conclusive facts and accurate materials!
I am too far away from the third grade, and I didn't know that the topic of my composition was so connotative now.
In fact, if understood literally, this should be "everyone is drunk and I wake up alone" and "everyone is blind and I wake up alone", that is, don't listen to other people's suggestions, don't do what others do, have your own understanding and judgment and personality, be the one who doesn't cry, or understand and tolerate others to be the one who doesn't cry.
But isn't it literal? Who knows?
All right! Try to write something according to your own understanding!
"When everyone is crying, some people should be allowed not to cry." This sentence expresses the meaning. I understand that there are two kinds:
There are those who cry and those who don't cry. There is no right or wrong. This is different ways for different people to express their feelings. This is their freedom.
The second is to understand and tolerate the differences in emotional expression between people who don't cry and the public, and respect them.
The movie The Battle of Changjin Lake is very touching. Many people shed tears at the movies. They turned their inner excitement and reverence for the hero into tears to show their respect for that battle and that history.
However, some people calmly watched the movie, wrote a film review, and calmly reviewed that history without shedding a tear. Will it be considered unpatriotic and disrespectful to those heroic soldiers who become ice sculptures?
Of course, we can't come to the conclusion that some people have low tears and can burst into tears at a touch; Some people are tough inside, and men are not easy to tear. Just respect and tolerate each other's expressions. No one's way is more correct and better.
In this modern age where everyone can show his personality, there is no need to copy and paste everything else. Can not follow the crowd, blindly follow the crowd, not kitsch. You can play cards without following the routine and fully express your true feelings.
When you have such a person around you, you should respect the personality of others and don't criticize or complain about his behavior because he is different.
Many moral kidnappings are actually disrespectful to some people.
For example, in natural disasters and earthquakes, those stars who have not donated money are easily hung on the moral cross, and the attackers simply can't see the story behind them. Maybe people are in an economic crisis, or they just do something else in a low profile.
So are some network storms.
If you follow the crowd, no one will say anything about you, but if you do something, all kinds of spittle can drown you.
Actor Kimi committed suicide because of depression, and Kimi's parents who lost their only son should be Lacrimosa every day as everyone normally predicted, and spend the rest of their lives in sadness.
If they do this, they will surely win the sympathy of the whole world.
However, Kimi's parents are very "deviant". After a short period of sadness, they began to catch up with fashion and start making short videos. The content of this video is not a sad story about their son's life, but a daily ramble about some strange and expensive lobsters and crabs. They work hard, eat happily, and sometimes they are silent and funny. ...
The departure of their son seems to have no effect on them.
Their comments under the video exploded, and someone asked how to eat. Some people criticized their expressions for being too exaggerated, while others accused and scolded them.
It seems a sin for them to laugh happily after their son left.
However, who stipulates that they will cry all their lives?
Maybe their solution to the problem of missing their son is to fill the hole in their hearts with superficial excitement, that is, they are too busy to miss their son, or to give their son more delicious food while he is alive?
If you are not a fish, how can you know the happiness of fish? Son is not Kimi's parents, how can you know their inner pain and sadness?
Besides, active life is the way Kimi's parents choose to spend the rest of their lives. They don't interfere with others. This is their freedom and right to maintain themselves, and no one can be harsh.
Russell said that jagged polymorphism is the source of happiness. Everyone has his own unique personality and thoughts. When his thoughts deviate from some social values, he should be himself as long as he is within the scope of legal morality, even if he is alienated from the world.
Therefore, when everyone is crying, we can stay awake and bravely follow our hearts. Crying or not is not the only expression.
Let's write these first. I wonder if I can escape it.
202 1 10 16 is in Shenzhen.