Provinces

Branch National Civil Service Examination Network

Current location: Home> Interview Coaching> Interview Guidance> Text

Civil Service Structured These small details of the interview must be handled carefully

2019-08-06 10:33:58 Public Examination Information Network

Courses

In public service interviews, The main form is still structured. Here, the Public Examination Information Network will talk to you about what behaviors examiners dislike during the scoring process, and how to answer questions to win the favor of examiners. These small details in structured interviews must be handled carefully.

1. In public service interviews, examiners are disgusted with candidates’ behavior like this:

1. Too many small moves

Some candidates are prone to making mistakes when they are nervous. There are some small movements, such as shaking legs, turning pens, sticking out tongues, shrugging shoulders, etc. However, in the eyes of the examiner, this is a sign that a person is not confident and is not calm enough.

2. Indiscriminate use of famous quotes and aphorisms

Some candidates like to quote, especially quotes from leaders’ speeches, in order to show their accumulation or to make their answers appear lofty. However, it is necessary to It should be noted that on the one hand, you should be very familiar with the famous quotes and aphorisms, and you should not make mistakes or be vague. On the other hand, you should not pile them up randomly or make mistakes in contextual quotations.

3. The voice is too low and the speaking speed is too fast or too slow

When answering questions, the voice must be loud and the speaking speed should be moderate, not too fast or too slow. If your voice is too fast, it is very likely that the examiner will not be able to hear your content clearly, or the examiner will not be able to hear your content at all. This problem will also occur if the speaking speed is not controlled properly. So if you want to get high scores, you must avoid this problem.

2. In public service interviews, examiners all appreciate candidates like this

1. Candidates with strong aura

Aura includes the candidate’s appearance , dress, behavior, emotional state, answering fluency, understanding and analysis of interview questions, etc., are the reflection of a candidate's comprehensive strength. The examiners have rich experience in personnel assessment and can often tell at a glance whether the candidates have aura. There are many factors that influence aura, but some can be revealed as soon as you enter the examination room, such as clothing, appearance, expression, etc. Among all the factors that affect aura, the most important thing for examiners is mentality, that is, whether the candidate is calm and calm after entering the venue, or whether he is panicked and confused. Mentality will also affect the candidate's language expression and whether the candidate can communicate naturally with the examiner. Just imagine, if a candidate is very nervous as soon as he enters the examination room, is trembling, speaks hesitantly, stares at the paper when answering questions, and lowers his head the whole time, how can he carry out his post-employment work as a civil servant?

Therefore, during the interview, Candidates should be confident, calm, calm and composed, and fully demonstrate their unique personal charm to the examiner. Don't let the examiner think that you have never seen a big scene and can't hold the situation. But everything must be done in a controlled manner. Too strong a personality will make it difficult to integrate into the group and is not conducive to unity; too strong an aura will also give people a sense of oppression and make the examiner find it difficult to control.

2. Candidates with unique perspectives

The structured interview format is standardized, easy to operate, and fair. From the perspective of the examiner's evaluation, there are also some disadvantages. The biggest disadvantage is "homogeneity" change". Just imagine, there are 20 people in an examination room, answering the same set of questions. The candidates are of similar age, have the same major, and have similar knowledge background and thinking. The examiner listens to the candidates answer questions dozens of times a day, and it is very easy to get bored. The expressions in the eyes gradually converge. Therefore, in the interview examination room, examiners, especially the chief examiner, hate templated and homogeneous answers, but like candidates who have unique thinking angles and personalized answers. There are many ways to express your uniqueness, and the uniqueness of your point of view is undoubtedly what the examiner likes the most. The reason is very simple. As an examiner, you naturally like something in-depth. Opinions are undoubtedly the most in-depth content in the interview.

Here, it needs to be emphasized that uniqueness does not mean sensationalism or being unconventional, but a way of thinking that embodies individuality on the basis of conforming to mainstream values ??and core socialist values.

3. Sincere and natural candidates