During the interview process, many candidates will encounter an old problem: they feel that they have nothing to say. They seem to have many opinions on an interview topic, but they seem to have nothing to say. This feeling will bring big problems to the candidates during the process of preparing for the exam, especially the impact on the candidates' self-confidence. They feel that their interview skills are very poor. Candidates often have to find ways to solve these problems, which can not only truly improve themselves. interview level, and can build up your self-confidence very well. So how can candidates solve the problem of feeling like they have nothing to say during the interview?

Method 1: Have the right way of thinking.

Each candidate should know where the words "have something to say" come from during the interview? In fact, the most important thing is that the so-called words are the key points of answering the question. If one candidate answers a question with three points and another candidate answers five points, then the content of the latter must be richer and more detailed, while the former candidate will feel that they have nothing to say when compared, so we will During the interview, you need to allow yourself to think of more key points to answer questions, so that you can have something to say during the interview. Thinking about the key points of answering questions depends on the correct way of thinking about the problem, such as the application of our most common subject analysis method. For example, the question: At present, there are many uncivilized driving behaviors on the road. What do you think? When we analyze, if we can think of the causes of this problem as drivers, road traffic management departments, and the social atmosphere of driving, this is the answer to the question. Several basic points, if the candidates can dig deep into the subject, it is also the responsibility of the driving school to consider this issue. Then the answer to this question has changed from three reasons to four reasons, and it is more profound. Therefore, candidates should study more analysis methods such as main body and level, so that the candidates' answer content will be more and richer.

Method 2: Expand the content of the question appropriately.

The so-called expansion of the question means that you cannot just say one sentence in the process of answering the question. For example, in the question just now, if you answer the question and analyze the driver's reasons, you can simply say one sentence: I think the driver's traffic safety awareness is weak. In this way, the candidates naturally said very little when answering the questions, and even answered a question within thirty seconds. It is not allowed to say this. It does not make the problem clear at all, so we need to explain the key points of the previous answers. For example: the driver’s awareness of traffic safety is weak and the concept of the rule of law is lacking. Without anyone’s supervision, the road The binding force of traffic laws on drivers will plummet, and many drivers consider themselves to be a sign of good driving skills after committing road traffic violations. These all lead to the occurrence of uncivilized traffic behaviors.

Method 3: Learn more about the background of some current political hot topics. It is easy to use when answering questions.

Many candidates lack the background of the questions when answering questions. This not only feels that the candidates’ language is empty and weak in the process of answering questions, but also feels that the candidates’ understanding of many issues lacks the current political situation. grasp. Examiners don't like this kind of answer, so candidates should read more hot topics and read more current reviews. The first two methods are to solve the problem of expression in the process of candidates' expression, and the third method is to make candidates improve from the core and fundamentals. method. Candidates should pay attention.

In fact, during the interview process, candidates need to better define their own situation. It is best to be stuck in the process of answering questions, because many candidates actually have rich language expressions in the process of answering questions, and There is a lot of content in answering questions, but when candidates listen to other people's answers, they feel that others have said some points that they did not expect, and then they will have a biased understanding of themselves and feel that they have said less. Candidates should avoid misunderstandings and truly improve their abilities.