1. The concept of “task-driven composition”
What is the so-called “task-driven composition”? It is named after computer terminology, and its essence is: adding "task-based instructions" to the open and exploratory "narrative new materials" provided to candidates, requiring candidates to follow the "instructions" to complete the writing task. Specifically, the "instructions" of the composition are the three sentences after providing "new narrative material": "What do you think about this matter?" "Express your attitude" and "Explain your views."
2. The difference between task-driven composition and new material composition
“Task-driven composition” and “new material composition” (providing open materials, deconstructing one-way What is the difference? In layman's terms, "task-driven composition" is to focus on the events in the material, "discuss the facts in detail, explain the truth deeply", tell the freshness, depth and warmth of the facts at multiple levels, and refuse to stuff into large paragraphs of ancient and modern Arguments based on famous events and quotes from China and abroad (if you want to quote famous events, it will only be in the form of sentences rather than paragraphs, which are naturally generated). The previous "composition on new materials" was based on "quotation (quoting materials, putting forward opinions) - argumentation (discussing materials, demonstrating opinions) - linking (associating famous events, strengthening opinions) - conclusion (summarizing the full text, restating opinions )" structure, you can even refine your ideas, discard the materials, and use associations to demonstrate your opinions. This will inevitably "bypass the materials" and unintentionally open the door to copying the structure, which is incompatible with the broad and boundless " Topic composition" is similar.
So, to put it simply, "task-driven composition" is to remove the association part of "new material composition" and require candidates to focus on "this thing" in the material and speak out a unique multi-layered The "principles" come from it, making readers moved and convinced. There is no need to recite entire paragraphs of "composition material". It can be seen that "task-driven composition" emphasizes the training of physiological thinking and the ability of rational expression. This is also a reference and attempt to learn from foreign college entrance examination compositions. For the majority of rural middle school students, the difficulty requirements of this type of essay are obviously higher than that of "new material essay", and it is also easier to identify candidates' thinking ability.
3. How to write a task-driven composition?
How to write a "task-driven essay"? I think it is similar to the writing method of a current review, and can be written roughly according to the structure of "introduction-argument-conclusion". It abandons the "association with famous events" part of "new material composition", but its "discussion" part is more complicated than the "discussion" of "new material composition": the "discussion" of new material composition is a simple discussion and analysis of materials. , and the "discussion" of "task-driven composition" requires making unique conclusions at multiple levels and dimensions, and conducting in-depth analysis to reveal the essence of things.
Specifically, the "introduction" at the beginning means: summarizing the material and putting forward fresh (novel and unique) ideas. The middle "discussion" (can be divided into three paragraphs), that is: reasoning based on the situation, and a layered discussion with depth (the points are clear and unique, and the reasons explained are reasonable and reasonable). The ending "knots", that is: quoting famous quotes, summarizing the whole text with force (quoting famous quotes, stopping at the point without developing the argument).
For example, the article "Cure a mistake with a mistake is not the main story", regarding the hotly debated incident of a "man in black" kicking a "spitting man" on the subway, he put forward the central argument: "Cure a mistake with a mistake is not the main story." "Justice", which changes the concept that most people praise the "man in black" for enforcing the law with justice, and has a novel and unique perspective. Then we analyze the underlying reasons why everyone agrees with the "Man in Black" at multiple levels: The spitting man was at fault first. "It was wrong first" has become a reason to commit violence and a weapon for self-sophistry. Finally, let’s return to the argument: Justice in the form of “treating wrongs with wrongs” is a manifestation of the original form of revenge consciousness and a regression of society. No matter who made the mistake first, “treating wrongs with wrongs” is not the way out. Only by treating wrongs according to law is social progress. key. The full text has a complete structure, is practical and logical, has a profound argument, and is thorough and convincing.
Obviously, to write a good task-driven composition, candidates need to cultivate independent rational thinking in their daily composition training. It can be said that high-quality compositions come from unique and profound thoughts, and unique and profound thoughts come from sophisticated reading and thinking.
Therefore, candidates may wish to pay more attention to controversial social news and read some current commentary articles in preparation for the exam