Current location - Quotes Website - Excellent quotations - What did environmental performance evaluation see?
What did environmental performance evaluation see?
EIA depends not only on the data, but also on the public's feelings.

Making the "baton" of assessment and evaluation greener and clearer will strongly promote leading cadres in all localities and departments to firmly establish a correct view of political achievements, put pollution prevention and control in an important position in all work, and intensify efforts and speed up progress.

In the autumn and winter of 2017-2018, Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei and surrounding areas carried out comprehensive air pollution control actions. On May 3, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment reported the completion of the air quality target. The assessment results of Handan, Hebei, Yangquan, Shanxi and Jincheng, Shanxi were "unqualified", and the main person in charge of the municipal government was interviewed. Although the relevant departments and provincial (municipal) governments have played a powerful combination of strengthening supervision and quantitative accountability, there are still some places that have not achieved the pollution control objectives, which makes people realize more and more that pollution prevention and control is really an arduous battle and a protracted war.

To fight this battle well, it is very important to play the role of "baton" and "hard lever" in the performance appraisal. Only by establishing and perfecting an objective, fair, scientific and standardized performance evaluation system, highlighting key points, paying attention to actual results and giving both rewards and punishments, can the evaluation results accurately reflect the environmental performance of leading cadres in a period, correct their views on political achievements and development, and push forward the pollution control campaign in depth.

To accurately evaluate the environmental performance of leading cadres in various localities and departments, we should pay attention to the following points:

? First, we should not only look at understanding, but also at practical work. It depends not only on whether leading cadres' understanding of ecological civilization construction is in place, but also on whether they are correct in actual work, whether they are grasping the iron and whether they are "important to say, loud to shout, and neutral to do".

Second, the horizontal ratio is both vertical and horizontal. We should not only compare this place with other places, but also look at the changes in this place itself. Horizontal ranking and vertical change should be measured together. For example, although the environmental quality of a city ranks high, compared with its own historical situation, it shows a downward trend, which is undoubtedly an unsatisfactory environmental performance; Although the environmental quality of a city is not in the forefront, it shows a trend of continuous improvement compared with its own historical situation, which is undoubtedly a better environmental performance.

The third is to look at both environmental data and public feelings. It depends not only on the environmental monitoring data, but also on the public's recognition of environmental quality and the public's satisfaction with the government's environmental protection work, and wring out the water that may exist in the data with the actual feelings of the public. The environmental data of a place is beautiful, but the public satisfaction is low, environmental pollution incidents occur frequently, and the public's environmental rights and interests are not guaranteed, so these beautiful data may be distorted. In the target evaluation index of ecological civilization construction, we should give higher scores and weights to the indicators that reflect the people's sense of gain.

The fourth is to look at both "outstanding achievements" and "potential achievements". Leading cadres should do things that ordinary people can see, touch and get benefits, and also do things that pave the way, lay the foundation and benefit future generations. Then, when assessing the political achievements of leading cadres, we should not only look at the temporary environmental quality, but also look at the local situation of promoting supply-side structural reform and high-quality economic development, industrial layout and economic structure, and environmental protection infrastructure construction. The basic work of improving environmental quality has been done solidly, and efforts have been made to make "potential contributions", which will continue to produce good results in the future, and such environmental protection achievements will be reflected in the future.

Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, China has made unprecedented determination, strength and achievements in promoting the construction of ecological civilization. The prevention and control of air, water and soil pollution has achieved remarkable results, and the ecological environment has improved. However, environmental problems are still the focus of the whole society, and whether building a well-off society in an all-round way can be recognized by the people is a key. There is still a long way to go to win the battle against pollution. Making the "baton" of assessment and evaluation greener and clearer will strongly promote leading cadres in all localities and departments to firmly establish a correct view of political achievements, put pollution prevention and control in an important position in all work, intensify efforts and speed up progress, and continuously enhance people's sense of ecological environment acquisition, happiness and security.

Source: People's Daily-People's Daily