Nadal is one of the best players in active men's tennis. Sampras has retired for many years, but he was invincible when he was on the court. Sampras set a record for the most Grand Slams in men's tennis, but that record has now been broken. Although they are not tennis players of the same generation, the competition between the two legends also makes many fans look forward to it. If Nadal at his peak and Sampras at his peak played against each other ten times, the outcome would make many people speculate. I think if these two people meet ten times, Nadal should be able to lead 6:4.

Nadal is the king of clay, so he can completely defeat Sampras on clay. Sampras won 14 Grand Slam championships in a row, but none of them was in Flushing, so his record at the French Open was poor. When Sampras met Nadal, he had no ability to fight back on clay, so Nadal could win three games on clay.

Sampras is the king of grass. He has won 7 Wimbledon championships in a row, so Sampras can defeat Nadal at Wimbledon. In fact, Nadal's results at Wimbledon were not very good. He only won two Wimbledon championships, so he will lose to Sampras at Wimbledon, so the two wins at Wimbledon will be won by Sampras. in hand.

As for the US Open and Australian Open, there is actually not much difference in the results between the two, so the probability of them winning is basically the same. So why did Nadal lead 6:4? That's because although Nadal moves slower than Sampras, his tenacity is touching, so Nadal has one more victory than Sampras in the US Open and Australian Open. Nadal is a player who refuses to admit defeat and will persist even in the face of desperate situations, which will also allow him to achieve unimaginable results.

Of course this is just my personal opinion as a tennis fan. After all, I am a Nadal fan. Both players have created impressive achievements in their own time. They are both the greatest tennis players, whether they are retired or on the court, best wishes.