When he quoted very objective scientific knowledge in "Life, the Awakened One", he was very unobjective. If someone studies this part seriously, he may have learned wrong knowledge. For example, it talks about 1,000 kinds of bacteria, 10 minutes, 4,000 kinds of animals, 2, 3 pounds, etc.

It is not a vocabulary used for popular science. Generally speaking, specific numbers are mentioned. If you don’t know, just say about 1,000 species, more than 4,000 species, etc.

Even whether parthenogenesis is only a Komodo dragon or a lizard is mentioned [face covering] [face covering]. Let’s not talk about occasional parthenogenesis for now, just talk about periodic parthenogenesis. Reproduction and frequent parthenogenesis include some bees, some aphids, some sharks, some shrimps, stick insects, and many more.

As for the fact that the bacterial flora inside leads to the appearance of husband and wife, he probably said it casually and has no scientific basis. There are some conjectures in this regard in evolutionary biology and psychology, but none of them are scientific basis. Not to mention the impact of colony exchange he mentioned.

It’s okay for people to express their own thoughts, because everyone thinks based on their own known knowledge system, but since natural science is to be quoted, it should respect its objectivity and be more rigorous. The following has nothing to do with scientific arguments. It depends on everyone’s understanding and interest. To sum up, the scientific knowledge in the video can be said to be half-baked.