As a person in charge of peer education and a psychological counselor, I think there are many reasons for this increase in communication speed. The physiological reasons are on the one hand. Because many gay men use anal sex, the rectal mucosa is more easily damaged, and semen is a good carrier of HIV, so this behavior is more likely to infect AIDS. For lesbians, their infection rate is much less, because their behavior is not so intense and there is not so much exchange of body fluids, and their infection rate may even be less than that of heterosexuals. Physiological structure is one of the reasons for this problem.
the second reason is caused by physiological problems. Because the opposite sex will involve a pregnancy problem, the use of condoms will be very common in the life of the opposite sex, but among gay men, the use of condoms can be said to be half and half, they don't have to worry about pregnancy, and everyone knows that using condoms will be "not so cool." What's more, some people know the function of condoms and the harm of sexually transmitted diseases, but they don't use condoms. They think that the effectiveness of condoms and the infection of diseases are both probability issues-this idea is ridiculous. Others don't want to use condoms because they think that the other person doesn't carry the virus, but he really doesn't know what symptoms and characteristics HIV-infected people will have before they get sick-is this conceit or is he really unaware of the seriousness of the problem? There are many reasons, but they boil down to one: not using condoms or using them irregularly can be the second reason.
from another angle, we can consider social factors. If it weren't for this World AIDS Day, I don't think our institutions would pay attention to homosexuality. We have been avoiding this matter. No matter from the social system or people's cognition, we have never put homosexuality in a correct position. Homosexuality has not been taken seriously, most people live in the dark, and many things are not standardized. This is the problem. Nowadays, the sexual relationship between homosexuals is very chaotic, and one person may have sex with many people, which can be a number of hundreds or thousands, so I will think that the infection rate of AIDS is a normal value. Moreover, this is not simply a question of code of conduct. After further exploration, we find that they do this because their needs are not met, and they have no right way, because the same-sex partnership is not protected. There are many similar situations. The relationship between social factors is very complicated, and it is not as simple as simply setting up a sodomy crime. People in some places don't even have this awareness. They only use this as a way to release their desires, just like masturbation, so we will see same-sex prostitutes, who are indifferent. We have been avoiding this matter before, and even suppressing it. As a result, things have become more and more complicated, so it is natural to have such a result today. This phenomenon conforms to the famous saying: if you don't break out in silence, you will perish in silence. Even worse, most homosexuals are still forced by traditional ideas to get married and have children. Of course, many people also have same-sex relationships outside marriage, which will infect their wives and children. In a word, I think social factors are the main reason for this matter.
I attribute the main cause of the problem to social factors, not "cynics". Because the physical problem is easy to solve, only one condom is needed, and this problem is basically solved. But what about social problems? At present, there are many voluntary organizations, all of which are spontaneously and systematically guiding this matter to develop in a positive direction, but sometimes these organizations will be suppressed-this can show the seriousness of the problem. The crux of social factors lies in attitude. This year's World AIDS Day, homosexuality will be put in the limelight again. The Dali government funded the construction of gay bars, and the news was in the major media, with mixed comments. Just like when Chinese people knew about homosexuality a few years ago, many people would directly associate homosexuality with AIDS, and there were even some words like "moral corruption", "unconscionable" and "abnormal". These words over the past few years have brought about this result today. If we continue this practice today, what will happen in a few years? Or let's think about it pragmatically: