Liu Xiang once said in Han Dynasty: Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools. I admit it, but have you ever thought that books are medicines, so medicines can be divided into two categories: 1. Good medicine can cure diseases; Poison can be deadly. The first category refers to good books, and the second category refers to bad books. Reading bad books is like eating poison and ruining your future. In this case, how can you say that opening books is beneficial?
If a person reads a bad book, it is like making a bad friend, and your own future will be buried. Nowadays, many children are engaged in illegal activities outside, not only reading bad books in adolescence, but also many books nowadays are unhealthy books. Excuse me, how to ensure that teenagers don't read these books now?
The ancients said, "Opening books is beneficial." Indeed, reading widely can make people knowledgeable, eloquent and respected.
Du Fu, the poet saint, has a famous saying: "Reading breaks thousands of volumes, and writing is like a god." This is undeniable. Du Fu has read countless books. Although many books have been turned over and torn by him, the knowledge in them has been deeply imprinted in his mind. When he wrote articles and poems, a string of good words and sentences flowed down from the pen tip, and one excellent poem after another was passed down from generation to generation.
Therefore, reading more useful books can help us write good articles. Books are the nourishment of human beings and the source of human knowledge. Just like a civilized country, if it loses the culture of books, it will be a once prosperous country.
The degree will face the threat of extinction. Therefore, people can never live without books.
However, people in modern society have overturned the old adage that "opening books is beneficial" because they think that "opening books is not necessarily beneficial". Of course, the statement that "reading books is beneficial" does not mean that reading more books is not beneficial, but that reading more unhealthy books will have an impact on the body and mind, which is not beneficial. When you read too many unhealthy books, your poisoning will get deeper and deeper, leading to rolling in the deep, and you will never have a chance to turn over. What a tragic fate! A person's bright future lies in the type of books he chooses. If he chooses useful books, his future will be bright. such as
If he chooses those unhealthy books, his future will be dark, but if he can pull back from the brink in time and make a fresh start, I believe he will have a bright future. Therefore, the statement that "opening books is beneficial" is not entirely true.
Reading more books is a good thing, but you must read books that are beneficial and harmless to your physical and mental health.
Opening books may not be beneficial, and sometimes (if you read bad books) it will cause damage. As educator Xu Teli said, "It's no use reading books about your family." Most unhealthy things come from reading those bad books. The criminal facts of some teenagers in today's society are a good proof, that is, they are polluted by those bad books and periodicals, infected with bad hobbies, and finally embark on the road of illegal crimes.
People often say: "It is beneficial to open books and read books." However, after careful consideration, this statement is not entirely correct. If we are interested in every book, it may not be good to open it.
Nowadays, students may all like to read martial arts and romance novels, books and periodicals, and sometimes forget to eat or sleep. Once they get lost in reading, they will be possessed. Then they concentrate on books in class and have no intention to study, and their grades will plummet. Others are attracted by some plots in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes take the road of crime. Isn't reading killing yourself? This is only the first layer of "opening books is beneficial": opening books is beneficial. And the second floor.
The second is that we should have a choice when studying. Don't read unhealthy books that don't help us much. When reading, you should read some books that are beneficial to your physical and mental health and helpful to your study and life. Such a book is a good book. Only by reading well will you not ruin yourself. Some people compare books to friends. If you value books, you will make good friends and make progress. If you don't read good books, of course, you will make friends with people who don't make good friends, and then you will regress. Because near Zhu Zhechi, near Mexico is black! Therefore, only reading will be beneficial to you. Therefore, in my opinion, opening books may not be beneficial. I sincerely hope that every student can read books selectively. Don't lead yourself astray and ruin your life just because you read a wrong book.
I don't think it is necessarily beneficial to open books. It is true that reading can make people increase their knowledge, cultivate their temperament and cultivate their body and mind, but "opening books" is only a necessary condition, not a sufficient condition.
"Books are still medicine. Good reading can cure fools." Since books are medicine, they have two functions: first, good medicine will cure diseases; One is poison, which can kill people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 1920s, many people were regarded as Hitler's martyrdom because of its bad influence on Mein Kampf. Bad books, like bad friends, may kill you. It's true. Now some students are addicted to martial arts or romance novels, reading those grotesque books all day, and "throwing" their homework aside, which leads to a decline in their academic performance, and finally draw water with a sieve. Just think, can a book like "Open" be said to be "beneficial"? "A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber." Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open a book depends on what volume to open first.
A philosopher once said that people who can get the necessary nutrition are healthier than those who eat more. At the same time, real scholars are often not people who read, but people who can read. Some people don't think seriously about reading, but just skim it. Some people read books that are not suitable for them, and some people even read books with a curious attitude. How can such an "open book" be useful?
As an emphasis on the importance of reading, the idiom "opening books is beneficial" naturally has its positive significance, but if it is regarded as the judgment of "opening books is beneficial", it is an inappropriate understanding.
1, as the saying goes, reading is beneficial ~ According to the argument, reading is a good thing.
Then reading is not necessarily a good thing because of the position expressed by the other party.
The point of confrontation between the two sides lies in the understanding of open books ~ that is, the scope of understanding of books varies according to different positions ~ The arguments that the positive side can support are like books allowed to be published by national laws, which can promote a person from any aspect and angle.
The opposing view is that reading needs+discrimination ~ you can't read just for reading.
2. Open book is understood as open book in the exam.
This box can be illustrated by the fact that everyone's attention to the course will decline.
The opposing side can start with improving everyone's practical ability and comprehensive reading comprehension and analysis ability.
The positive views are: opening books is beneficial; The opposing view is that opening books may not be beneficial. I object. First of all, my understanding of "opening books is beneficial" is that opening books is not necessarily beneficial, including two layers. First, opening books is not necessarily beneficial; The other layer is not necessarily useless.
People often say: "It is beneficial to open books and read books." However, on closer examination, this statement is not entirely correct. If we are interested in every book, it may not be good to open it.
Ma Su is familiar with Sun Tzu's Art of War and has also talked about it. However, when Zhuge Liang entrusted him with a heavy responsibility and led the troops to guard the street kiosks, he used the art of war to let the army camp on the mountain without food and water. As a result, Sima Yi was surrounded and cut off the water source, which led to failure. It can be seen that just opening books blindly may not be beneficial, but more importantly, practice and flexibility.
Everyone thinks books are a good thing, but they are not. Good books will enrich our knowledge, but bad books will make people confused and do things that violate the law. This can be said to be "tired of playing with books." If so, how can it be said that opening books is beneficial?
Some books will also kill your will. You are addicted to these books, and you don't care about your studies. You just want to read these books. Can books be eaten as meals? Opening these volumes will also bring you "despair"
In addition, at our age, some people love reading, and reading for too long affects their eyesight.
When we were studying, we didn't take part in any other activities and lost our sociality. We will become introverted, unwilling to talk to others and only willing to be friends with books. This is not good for us, but it hurts us.
Some people read books, the Scarlet Letter today, the Hunter's Notes tomorrow and the day after tomorrow ... This not only wastes time, but also does not bring much benefit.
Some students have no choice in reading. They are either swordsmen with swords and shadows, or they are having an affair between flowers and moons. What's more, indulging in reactionary pornography corrupts physical and mental health. As soon as they opened the book, they forgot to eat and sleep, and they couldn't put it down. Not only did they neglect their studies, but they were even more sad to go astray. They can be described as "breaking thousands of books", but they can't "write like a god". Can this be said to be "conducive to opening books"?